Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm

Radek Bukowski, David Gahn, Jennifer Denning, George Saade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential. STUDY DESIGN: In a case control design, data on 44 preterm deliveries at ≤34 weeks were compared with data on a control group of next consecutive term deliveries. Criteria for inclusion were dating by ultrasonography at <20 weeks and no medical or obstetric complications. For each fetus, GROW v.2 software was used to generate an individual optimal growth curve and to calculate the percentile of achieved growth potential for birth weight based on 6 independent factors (maternal weight, height, parity, ethnicity, fetal sex, and gestational age) identified as determining fetal weight from multivariate logistic regression analysis of 40,000 uncomplicated term pregnancies. Birth weight percentiles based on standard norms were also calculated for each fetus. RESULTS: The number of fetuses with birth weight below the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile of their growth potential was significantly higher in the preterm group (10, 13, and 18) compared with that in the control group (2, 2, and 6; P < .008, P < .001, and P < .008, respectively). There were no significant differences in variables defining growth potential between the case and control groups. The number of fetuses below the 5th and 10th percentile based on standard birth weight norms was not significantly different between preterm and term pregnancies (3 vs 1 and 5 vs 2; P = .37 and P = .27). Among preterm deliveries, those preceded by preterm premature rupture of the membranes had significantly fewer fetuses >75th percentile of their growth potential (2 vs 8; P = .025). Fetuses with lower gestational ages at preterm delivery achieved lower median percentiles of their growth potential. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential compared with those delivered at term. This finding challenges our concept of preterm delivery and management strategy aimed at tocolysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-467
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume185
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Fetus
Growth
Tocolysis
Gestational Age
Ultrasonography
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Fetus
  • Growth
  • Preterm delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm. / Bukowski, Radek; Gahn, David; Denning, Jennifer; Saade, George.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 185, No. 2, 2001, p. 463-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bukowski, Radek ; Gahn, David ; Denning, Jennifer ; Saade, George. / Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001 ; Vol. 185, No. 2. pp. 463-467.
@article{1eca148f79884a3981fe58887e18bdcb,
title = "Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential. STUDY DESIGN: In a case control design, data on 44 preterm deliveries at ≤34 weeks were compared with data on a control group of next consecutive term deliveries. Criteria for inclusion were dating by ultrasonography at <20 weeks and no medical or obstetric complications. For each fetus, GROW v.2 software was used to generate an individual optimal growth curve and to calculate the percentile of achieved growth potential for birth weight based on 6 independent factors (maternal weight, height, parity, ethnicity, fetal sex, and gestational age) identified as determining fetal weight from multivariate logistic regression analysis of 40,000 uncomplicated term pregnancies. Birth weight percentiles based on standard norms were also calculated for each fetus. RESULTS: The number of fetuses with birth weight below the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile of their growth potential was significantly higher in the preterm group (10, 13, and 18) compared with that in the control group (2, 2, and 6; P < .008, P < .001, and P < .008, respectively). There were no significant differences in variables defining growth potential between the case and control groups. The number of fetuses below the 5th and 10th percentile based on standard birth weight norms was not significantly different between preterm and term pregnancies (3 vs 1 and 5 vs 2; P = .37 and P = .27). Among preterm deliveries, those preceded by preterm premature rupture of the membranes had significantly fewer fetuses >75th percentile of their growth potential (2 vs 8; P = .025). Fetuses with lower gestational ages at preterm delivery achieved lower median percentiles of their growth potential. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential compared with those delivered at term. This finding challenges our concept of preterm delivery and management strategy aimed at tocolysis.",
keywords = "Fetus, Growth, Preterm delivery",
author = "Radek Bukowski and David Gahn and Jennifer Denning and George Saade",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1067/mob.2001.115865",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "185",
pages = "463--467",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm

AU - Bukowski, Radek

AU - Gahn, David

AU - Denning, Jennifer

AU - Saade, George

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential. STUDY DESIGN: In a case control design, data on 44 preterm deliveries at ≤34 weeks were compared with data on a control group of next consecutive term deliveries. Criteria for inclusion were dating by ultrasonography at <20 weeks and no medical or obstetric complications. For each fetus, GROW v.2 software was used to generate an individual optimal growth curve and to calculate the percentile of achieved growth potential for birth weight based on 6 independent factors (maternal weight, height, parity, ethnicity, fetal sex, and gestational age) identified as determining fetal weight from multivariate logistic regression analysis of 40,000 uncomplicated term pregnancies. Birth weight percentiles based on standard norms were also calculated for each fetus. RESULTS: The number of fetuses with birth weight below the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile of their growth potential was significantly higher in the preterm group (10, 13, and 18) compared with that in the control group (2, 2, and 6; P < .008, P < .001, and P < .008, respectively). There were no significant differences in variables defining growth potential between the case and control groups. The number of fetuses below the 5th and 10th percentile based on standard birth weight norms was not significantly different between preterm and term pregnancies (3 vs 1 and 5 vs 2; P = .37 and P = .27). Among preterm deliveries, those preceded by preterm premature rupture of the membranes had significantly fewer fetuses >75th percentile of their growth potential (2 vs 8; P = .025). Fetuses with lower gestational ages at preterm delivery achieved lower median percentiles of their growth potential. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential compared with those delivered at term. This finding challenges our concept of preterm delivery and management strategy aimed at tocolysis.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential. STUDY DESIGN: In a case control design, data on 44 preterm deliveries at ≤34 weeks were compared with data on a control group of next consecutive term deliveries. Criteria for inclusion were dating by ultrasonography at <20 weeks and no medical or obstetric complications. For each fetus, GROW v.2 software was used to generate an individual optimal growth curve and to calculate the percentile of achieved growth potential for birth weight based on 6 independent factors (maternal weight, height, parity, ethnicity, fetal sex, and gestational age) identified as determining fetal weight from multivariate logistic regression analysis of 40,000 uncomplicated term pregnancies. Birth weight percentiles based on standard norms were also calculated for each fetus. RESULTS: The number of fetuses with birth weight below the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile of their growth potential was significantly higher in the preterm group (10, 13, and 18) compared with that in the control group (2, 2, and 6; P < .008, P < .001, and P < .008, respectively). There were no significant differences in variables defining growth potential between the case and control groups. The number of fetuses below the 5th and 10th percentile based on standard birth weight norms was not significantly different between preterm and term pregnancies (3 vs 1 and 5 vs 2; P = .37 and P = .27). Among preterm deliveries, those preceded by preterm premature rupture of the membranes had significantly fewer fetuses >75th percentile of their growth potential (2 vs 8; P = .025). Fetuses with lower gestational ages at preterm delivery achieved lower median percentiles of their growth potential. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of fetuses destined to deliver preterm do not reach their individual growth potential compared with those delivered at term. This finding challenges our concept of preterm delivery and management strategy aimed at tocolysis.

KW - Fetus

KW - Growth

KW - Preterm delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034892476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034892476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mob.2001.115865

DO - 10.1067/mob.2001.115865

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 463

EP - 467

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -