TY - JOUR
T1 - Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs
AU - Scheltinga, M. R.
AU - Helton, W. S.
AU - Rounds, J.
AU - Jacobs, D. O.
AU - Wilmore, D. W.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9% saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.
AB - Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9% saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.
KW - bioelectrical impedance analysis
KW - body composition
KW - physiological monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025736136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025736136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.5.2039
DO - 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.5.2039
M3 - Article
C2 - 1864785
AN - SCOPUS:0025736136
SN - 0161-7567
VL - 70
SP - 2039
EP - 2044
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 5
ER -