In vivo biological validation and biophysical modeling of the sensitivity and positive accuracy of endocrine peak detection. I. The LH pulse signal

Randall Urban, M. L. Johnson, J. D. Veldhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The false positive (type I) and false negative (type II) errors inherent in computerized peak detection algorithms can have a major impact on the valid interpretation of physiological experiments. To objectively define the nature and extent of statistical errors associated with the identification of episodic gonadotropin (LH) peaks, we have employed two complementary approaches. First, using a general biophysical model for simulating episodic LH secretion, we have estimated optimal pulse analysis parameters that yield maximal sensitivity (probability of find any given peak) and positive accuracy (probability that any identified peak is a true pulse) in synthetic LH series approximating those observed spontaneously in vivo. Secondly, we have estimated optimal peak detection parameters in an in vivo primate animal model, in which electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous LH pulses were documented independently by continuous electrophysiological monitoring of medial basal hypothalamus multiunit activity. These combined approaches indicate that LH time series can be analyzed for episodic LH pulsatility by an appropriately constrained, objective computerized algorithm with minimal false negative and false positive errors, i.e. with resultant high sensitivity and positive accuracy. Moreover, optimal pulse analysis parameters exhibited similar sensitivity and positive accuracy rates in both the biophysical simulations and the animal model. Thus, we suggest that the combinated use of an algebraically explicit biophysical simulation model and an in vivo animal paradigm may serve to clarify the nature and extent of false negative and false positive errors in the detection of other hormone peaks as well as the gonadotropin LH.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2541-2547
Number of pages7
JournalEndocrinology
Volume124
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gonadotropins
Animal Models
Middle Hypothalamus
Primates
Hormones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

In vivo biological validation and biophysical modeling of the sensitivity and positive accuracy of endocrine peak detection. I. The LH pulse signal. / Urban, Randall; Johnson, M. L.; Veldhuis, J. D.

In: Endocrinology, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1989, p. 2541-2547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11db5b860889458a8860068a88918029,
title = "In vivo biological validation and biophysical modeling of the sensitivity and positive accuracy of endocrine peak detection. I. The LH pulse signal",
abstract = "The false positive (type I) and false negative (type II) errors inherent in computerized peak detection algorithms can have a major impact on the valid interpretation of physiological experiments. To objectively define the nature and extent of statistical errors associated with the identification of episodic gonadotropin (LH) peaks, we have employed two complementary approaches. First, using a general biophysical model for simulating episodic LH secretion, we have estimated optimal pulse analysis parameters that yield maximal sensitivity (probability of find any given peak) and positive accuracy (probability that any identified peak is a true pulse) in synthetic LH series approximating those observed spontaneously in vivo. Secondly, we have estimated optimal peak detection parameters in an in vivo primate animal model, in which electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous LH pulses were documented independently by continuous electrophysiological monitoring of medial basal hypothalamus multiunit activity. These combined approaches indicate that LH time series can be analyzed for episodic LH pulsatility by an appropriately constrained, objective computerized algorithm with minimal false negative and false positive errors, i.e. with resultant high sensitivity and positive accuracy. Moreover, optimal pulse analysis parameters exhibited similar sensitivity and positive accuracy rates in both the biophysical simulations and the animal model. Thus, we suggest that the combinated use of an algebraically explicit biophysical simulation model and an in vivo animal paradigm may serve to clarify the nature and extent of false negative and false positive errors in the detection of other hormone peaks as well as the gonadotropin LH.",
author = "Randall Urban and Johnson, {M. L.} and Veldhuis, {J. D.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "2541--2547",
journal = "Endocrinology",
issn = "0013-7227",
publisher = "The Endocrine Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vivo biological validation and biophysical modeling of the sensitivity and positive accuracy of endocrine peak detection. I. The LH pulse signal

AU - Urban, Randall

AU - Johnson, M. L.

AU - Veldhuis, J. D.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The false positive (type I) and false negative (type II) errors inherent in computerized peak detection algorithms can have a major impact on the valid interpretation of physiological experiments. To objectively define the nature and extent of statistical errors associated with the identification of episodic gonadotropin (LH) peaks, we have employed two complementary approaches. First, using a general biophysical model for simulating episodic LH secretion, we have estimated optimal pulse analysis parameters that yield maximal sensitivity (probability of find any given peak) and positive accuracy (probability that any identified peak is a true pulse) in synthetic LH series approximating those observed spontaneously in vivo. Secondly, we have estimated optimal peak detection parameters in an in vivo primate animal model, in which electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous LH pulses were documented independently by continuous electrophysiological monitoring of medial basal hypothalamus multiunit activity. These combined approaches indicate that LH time series can be analyzed for episodic LH pulsatility by an appropriately constrained, objective computerized algorithm with minimal false negative and false positive errors, i.e. with resultant high sensitivity and positive accuracy. Moreover, optimal pulse analysis parameters exhibited similar sensitivity and positive accuracy rates in both the biophysical simulations and the animal model. Thus, we suggest that the combinated use of an algebraically explicit biophysical simulation model and an in vivo animal paradigm may serve to clarify the nature and extent of false negative and false positive errors in the detection of other hormone peaks as well as the gonadotropin LH.

AB - The false positive (type I) and false negative (type II) errors inherent in computerized peak detection algorithms can have a major impact on the valid interpretation of physiological experiments. To objectively define the nature and extent of statistical errors associated with the identification of episodic gonadotropin (LH) peaks, we have employed two complementary approaches. First, using a general biophysical model for simulating episodic LH secretion, we have estimated optimal pulse analysis parameters that yield maximal sensitivity (probability of find any given peak) and positive accuracy (probability that any identified peak is a true pulse) in synthetic LH series approximating those observed spontaneously in vivo. Secondly, we have estimated optimal peak detection parameters in an in vivo primate animal model, in which electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous LH pulses were documented independently by continuous electrophysiological monitoring of medial basal hypothalamus multiunit activity. These combined approaches indicate that LH time series can be analyzed for episodic LH pulsatility by an appropriately constrained, objective computerized algorithm with minimal false negative and false positive errors, i.e. with resultant high sensitivity and positive accuracy. Moreover, optimal pulse analysis parameters exhibited similar sensitivity and positive accuracy rates in both the biophysical simulations and the animal model. Thus, we suggest that the combinated use of an algebraically explicit biophysical simulation model and an in vivo animal paradigm may serve to clarify the nature and extent of false negative and false positive errors in the detection of other hormone peaks as well as the gonadotropin LH.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024516147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024516147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2707166

AN - SCOPUS:0024516147

VL - 124

SP - 2541

EP - 2547

JO - Endocrinology

JF - Endocrinology

SN - 0013-7227

IS - 5

ER -