Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device

Aditya Vedantam, Vikas Y. Rao, Hashem Shaltoni, Michel E. Mawad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters such as the pipeline embolization device (PED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of side branch occlusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) branch occlusion after deployment of PEDs for ICA aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs for ICA aneurysms between June 2011 and March 2013. Forty-nine patients (43 women, mean age 56.3± 1.8 years, 68 aneurysms) in whom PEDs traversed the origin of supraclinoid ICA branches (ophthalmic [OA], posterior communicating [PcommA], and anterior choroidal artery [AChA]) were selected for this study. Follow-up angiograms (mean follow-up, 12.8 ± 0.8 months) were studied to determine the location of PEDs and the patency of ICA branches. RESULTS: PEDs were placed across the ostia of 49 OAs, 14 PcommAs, and 11 AChAs. Multiple PEDs were deployed in 16 patients. Rate of branch occlusion was 4% (2/49) for the OA, 7.1% (1/14) for the PcommA, and 0% for the AChA. Patients with branch occlusion did not endure new neurological deficits. ICA branch occlusion was not associated with the number of PEDs covering the ostia (P = .76) or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm (P = .24). CONCLUSION: The incidence of major supraclinoid ICA branch occlusion after treatment with PEDs was low. These events were not associated with new neurological deficits nor were they related to the number of PEDs deployed or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-178
Number of pages6
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internal Carotid Artery
Aneurysm
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence
Therapeutics
Arteries
Intracranial Aneurysm
Angiography

Keywords

  • Flow diverter
  • Internal carotid artery aneurysm
  • Pipeline embolization device
  • Side branch occlusion
  • Supraclinoid internal carotid artery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. / Vedantam, Aditya; Rao, Vikas Y.; Shaltoni, Hashem; Mawad, Michel E.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 76, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 173-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac1055f48fd94f82a49f0a017358c57e,
title = "Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters such as the pipeline embolization device (PED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of side branch occlusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) branch occlusion after deployment of PEDs for ICA aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs for ICA aneurysms between June 2011 and March 2013. Forty-nine patients (43 women, mean age 56.3± 1.8 years, 68 aneurysms) in whom PEDs traversed the origin of supraclinoid ICA branches (ophthalmic [OA], posterior communicating [PcommA], and anterior choroidal artery [AChA]) were selected for this study. Follow-up angiograms (mean follow-up, 12.8 ± 0.8 months) were studied to determine the location of PEDs and the patency of ICA branches. RESULTS: PEDs were placed across the ostia of 49 OAs, 14 PcommAs, and 11 AChAs. Multiple PEDs were deployed in 16 patients. Rate of branch occlusion was 4{\%} (2/49) for the OA, 7.1{\%} (1/14) for the PcommA, and 0{\%} for the AChA. Patients with branch occlusion did not endure new neurological deficits. ICA branch occlusion was not associated with the number of PEDs covering the ostia (P = .76) or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm (P = .24). CONCLUSION: The incidence of major supraclinoid ICA branch occlusion after treatment with PEDs was low. These events were not associated with new neurological deficits nor were they related to the number of PEDs deployed or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm.",
keywords = "Flow diverter, Internal carotid artery aneurysm, Pipeline embolization device, Side branch occlusion, Supraclinoid internal carotid artery",
author = "Aditya Vedantam and Rao, {Vikas Y.} and Hashem Shaltoni and Mawad, {Michel E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "173--178",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device

AU - Vedantam, Aditya

AU - Rao, Vikas Y.

AU - Shaltoni, Hashem

AU - Mawad, Michel E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters such as the pipeline embolization device (PED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of side branch occlusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) branch occlusion after deployment of PEDs for ICA aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs for ICA aneurysms between June 2011 and March 2013. Forty-nine patients (43 women, mean age 56.3± 1.8 years, 68 aneurysms) in whom PEDs traversed the origin of supraclinoid ICA branches (ophthalmic [OA], posterior communicating [PcommA], and anterior choroidal artery [AChA]) were selected for this study. Follow-up angiograms (mean follow-up, 12.8 ± 0.8 months) were studied to determine the location of PEDs and the patency of ICA branches. RESULTS: PEDs were placed across the ostia of 49 OAs, 14 PcommAs, and 11 AChAs. Multiple PEDs were deployed in 16 patients. Rate of branch occlusion was 4% (2/49) for the OA, 7.1% (1/14) for the PcommA, and 0% for the AChA. Patients with branch occlusion did not endure new neurological deficits. ICA branch occlusion was not associated with the number of PEDs covering the ostia (P = .76) or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm (P = .24). CONCLUSION: The incidence of major supraclinoid ICA branch occlusion after treatment with PEDs was low. These events were not associated with new neurological deficits nor were they related to the number of PEDs deployed or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm.

AB - BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters such as the pipeline embolization device (PED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of side branch occlusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) branch occlusion after deployment of PEDs for ICA aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs for ICA aneurysms between June 2011 and March 2013. Forty-nine patients (43 women, mean age 56.3± 1.8 years, 68 aneurysms) in whom PEDs traversed the origin of supraclinoid ICA branches (ophthalmic [OA], posterior communicating [PcommA], and anterior choroidal artery [AChA]) were selected for this study. Follow-up angiograms (mean follow-up, 12.8 ± 0.8 months) were studied to determine the location of PEDs and the patency of ICA branches. RESULTS: PEDs were placed across the ostia of 49 OAs, 14 PcommAs, and 11 AChAs. Multiple PEDs were deployed in 16 patients. Rate of branch occlusion was 4% (2/49) for the OA, 7.1% (1/14) for the PcommA, and 0% for the AChA. Patients with branch occlusion did not endure new neurological deficits. ICA branch occlusion was not associated with the number of PEDs covering the ostia (P = .76) or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm (P = .24). CONCLUSION: The incidence of major supraclinoid ICA branch occlusion after treatment with PEDs was low. These events were not associated with new neurological deficits nor were they related to the number of PEDs deployed or the origin of ICA branches from the aneurysm.

KW - Flow diverter

KW - Internal carotid artery aneurysm

KW - Pipeline embolization device

KW - Side branch occlusion

KW - Supraclinoid internal carotid artery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925938018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925938018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595

DO - 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 173

EP - 178

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 2

ER -