Inclusion of turnover time does not influence identification of surgical services that over- and underutilize allocated block time

Amr Abouleish, Sharon L. Hensley, Mark H. Zornow, Donald Prough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r2 = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r2 = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)813-818
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume96
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Operating Room Information Systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Inclusion of turnover time does not influence identification of surgical services that over- and underutilize allocated block time. / Abouleish, Amr; Hensley, Sharon L.; Zornow, Mark H.; Prough, Donald.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 96, No. 3, 01.03.2003, p. 813-818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fba8aafdc2e14ea299187337ac62dcf3,
title = "Inclusion of turnover time does not influence identification of surgical services that over- and underutilize allocated block time",
abstract = "Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r2 = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r2 = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer.",
author = "Amr Abouleish and Hensley, {Sharon L.} and Zornow, {Mark H.} and Donald Prough",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "813--818",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusion of turnover time does not influence identification of surgical services that over- and underutilize allocated block time

AU - Abouleish, Amr

AU - Hensley, Sharon L.

AU - Zornow, Mark H.

AU - Prough, Donald

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r2 = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r2 = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer.

AB - Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r2 = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r2 = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037373143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037373143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12598267

AN - SCOPUS:0037373143

VL - 96

SP - 813

EP - 818

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 3

ER -