Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge

William Calhoun, N. N. Jarjour, G. J. Gleich, C. A. Stevens, W. W. Busse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Airway inflammation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal component of asthma. Because allergens provoke bronchial constriction and inflammation in allergic subjects, bronchial antigen challenge has emerged as a powerful technique for evaluating mechanisms involved in this process. In this study, we compare whole lung antigen challenge (WLAC) with segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) in eight allergic, non-asthmatic, non-smoking subjects, and evaluated the response by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) prior to, and 48 h after antigen challenge. Both challenge techniques evoked airway inflammation, manifest as an increase in total cells and eosinophils recovered by BAL, an increase in total protein concentration, and enhanced production of superoxide anion by airspace cells. The degree to which these changes occurred was significantly greater with SBP than WLAC, and only SBP evoked persistent measurable change in alveolar macrophage density and eosinophil granule protein concentrations. Moreover, although both techniques were associated with a comparable immediate fall in FEV1, only WLAC resulted in statistically significant persistent physiologic changes 48 h afterwards. We conclude that, as anticipated, SBP produces more intense airway inflammation in allergic subjects, does not result in late airway obstruction, and offers specific advantages in studying allergen-driven airway inflammation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1465-1471
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease
Volume147
Issue number6 I
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aerosols
Inflammation
Antigens
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Lung
Allergens
Eosinophil Granule Proteins
Bronchoconstriction
Alveolar Macrophages
Airway Obstruction
Eosinophils
Superoxides
Asthma
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Calhoun, W., Jarjour, N. N., Gleich, G. J., Stevens, C. A., & Busse, W. W. (1993). Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 147(6 I), 1465-1471.

Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge. / Calhoun, William; Jarjour, N. N.; Gleich, G. J.; Stevens, C. A.; Busse, W. W.

In: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 147, No. 6 I, 1993, p. 1465-1471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Calhoun, W, Jarjour, NN, Gleich, GJ, Stevens, CA & Busse, WW 1993, 'Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge', American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 147, no. 6 I, pp. 1465-1471.
Calhoun, William ; Jarjour, N. N. ; Gleich, G. J. ; Stevens, C. A. ; Busse, W. W. / Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge. In: American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1993 ; Vol. 147, No. 6 I. pp. 1465-1471.
@article{d9680c551cf840e3bab1e09620d1b5e4,
title = "Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge",
abstract = "Airway inflammation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal component of asthma. Because allergens provoke bronchial constriction and inflammation in allergic subjects, bronchial antigen challenge has emerged as a powerful technique for evaluating mechanisms involved in this process. In this study, we compare whole lung antigen challenge (WLAC) with segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) in eight allergic, non-asthmatic, non-smoking subjects, and evaluated the response by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) prior to, and 48 h after antigen challenge. Both challenge techniques evoked airway inflammation, manifest as an increase in total cells and eosinophils recovered by BAL, an increase in total protein concentration, and enhanced production of superoxide anion by airspace cells. The degree to which these changes occurred was significantly greater with SBP than WLAC, and only SBP evoked persistent measurable change in alveolar macrophage density and eosinophil granule protein concentrations. Moreover, although both techniques were associated with a comparable immediate fall in FEV1, only WLAC resulted in statistically significant persistent physiologic changes 48 h afterwards. We conclude that, as anticipated, SBP produces more intense airway inflammation in allergic subjects, does not result in late airway obstruction, and offers specific advantages in studying allergen-driven airway inflammation.",
author = "William Calhoun and Jarjour, {N. N.} and Gleich, {G. J.} and Stevens, {C. A.} and Busse, {W. W.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "1465--1471",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "6 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased airway inflammation with segmental versus aerosol antigen challenge

AU - Calhoun, William

AU - Jarjour, N. N.

AU - Gleich, G. J.

AU - Stevens, C. A.

AU - Busse, W. W.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Airway inflammation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal component of asthma. Because allergens provoke bronchial constriction and inflammation in allergic subjects, bronchial antigen challenge has emerged as a powerful technique for evaluating mechanisms involved in this process. In this study, we compare whole lung antigen challenge (WLAC) with segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) in eight allergic, non-asthmatic, non-smoking subjects, and evaluated the response by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) prior to, and 48 h after antigen challenge. Both challenge techniques evoked airway inflammation, manifest as an increase in total cells and eosinophils recovered by BAL, an increase in total protein concentration, and enhanced production of superoxide anion by airspace cells. The degree to which these changes occurred was significantly greater with SBP than WLAC, and only SBP evoked persistent measurable change in alveolar macrophage density and eosinophil granule protein concentrations. Moreover, although both techniques were associated with a comparable immediate fall in FEV1, only WLAC resulted in statistically significant persistent physiologic changes 48 h afterwards. We conclude that, as anticipated, SBP produces more intense airway inflammation in allergic subjects, does not result in late airway obstruction, and offers specific advantages in studying allergen-driven airway inflammation.

AB - Airway inflammation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal component of asthma. Because allergens provoke bronchial constriction and inflammation in allergic subjects, bronchial antigen challenge has emerged as a powerful technique for evaluating mechanisms involved in this process. In this study, we compare whole lung antigen challenge (WLAC) with segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) in eight allergic, non-asthmatic, non-smoking subjects, and evaluated the response by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) prior to, and 48 h after antigen challenge. Both challenge techniques evoked airway inflammation, manifest as an increase in total cells and eosinophils recovered by BAL, an increase in total protein concentration, and enhanced production of superoxide anion by airspace cells. The degree to which these changes occurred was significantly greater with SBP than WLAC, and only SBP evoked persistent measurable change in alveolar macrophage density and eosinophil granule protein concentrations. Moreover, although both techniques were associated with a comparable immediate fall in FEV1, only WLAC resulted in statistically significant persistent physiologic changes 48 h afterwards. We conclude that, as anticipated, SBP produces more intense airway inflammation in allergic subjects, does not result in late airway obstruction, and offers specific advantages in studying allergen-driven airway inflammation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027197003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027197003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8389107

AN - SCOPUS:0027197003

VL - 147

SP - 1465

EP - 1471

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 6 I

ER -