Increasing cancer screening

A meta-analysis

Jackie L. Snell, Era L. Buck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Primary care physicians believe preventive services are important, but perform these activities infrequently. Numerous studies have attempted to increase cancer screening, employing a variety of interventions with varying results. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to identify effective office-based interventions for increasing cancer screening. Selected studies: (a) evaluated an intervention in a primary care setting, (b) addressed screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer, and (c) reported results allowing calculation of an effect size. Study qualities and results were coded, entered, and analyzed using DSTAT. Results. Interventions targeting either physician or patient were equally successful (d = +0.1894 and d = +0.1756, respectively). However, studies targeting both physician and patient demonstrated a smaller effect size (d = +0.0514). Greater success was found for interventions targeting the physician both during and outside the patient visit (d = +0.1222 during visit, d = +0.1849 outside visit, d = +0.3375 both). Similarly, screening behavior improved when the physicians were the target of more than one, but not more than three, interventions (d = +0.1360, d = +0.2495, d = +0.6829, d = -0.0058). Conclusions. Cancer screening activities increase with interventions that target either the physician or the patient and, when physicians are targeted, multiple interventions to serve as behavior cues and increase awareness appear optimal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-707
Number of pages6
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Meta-Analysis
Physicians
Primary Care Physicians
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Cues
Colorectal Neoplasms
Primary Health Care
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • preventive medicine
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Increasing cancer screening : A meta-analysis. / Snell, Jackie L.; Buck, Era L.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 6, 11.1996, p. 702-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snell, Jackie L. ; Buck, Era L. / Increasing cancer screening : A meta-analysis. In: Preventive Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 702-707.
@article{0c1920768eb54befbe837578e1dcfa24,
title = "Increasing cancer screening: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background. Primary care physicians believe preventive services are important, but perform these activities infrequently. Numerous studies have attempted to increase cancer screening, employing a variety of interventions with varying results. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to identify effective office-based interventions for increasing cancer screening. Selected studies: (a) evaluated an intervention in a primary care setting, (b) addressed screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer, and (c) reported results allowing calculation of an effect size. Study qualities and results were coded, entered, and analyzed using DSTAT. Results. Interventions targeting either physician or patient were equally successful (d = +0.1894 and d = +0.1756, respectively). However, studies targeting both physician and patient demonstrated a smaller effect size (d = +0.0514). Greater success was found for interventions targeting the physician both during and outside the patient visit (d = +0.1222 during visit, d = +0.1849 outside visit, d = +0.3375 both). Similarly, screening behavior improved when the physicians were the target of more than one, but not more than three, interventions (d = +0.1360, d = +0.2495, d = +0.6829, d = -0.0058). Conclusions. Cancer screening activities increase with interventions that target either the physician or the patient and, when physicians are targeted, multiple interventions to serve as behavior cues and increase awareness appear optimal.",
keywords = "preventive medicine, primary care",
author = "Snell, {Jackie L.} and Buck, {Era L.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.1996.0109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "702--707",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing cancer screening

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Snell, Jackie L.

AU - Buck, Era L.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - Background. Primary care physicians believe preventive services are important, but perform these activities infrequently. Numerous studies have attempted to increase cancer screening, employing a variety of interventions with varying results. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to identify effective office-based interventions for increasing cancer screening. Selected studies: (a) evaluated an intervention in a primary care setting, (b) addressed screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer, and (c) reported results allowing calculation of an effect size. Study qualities and results were coded, entered, and analyzed using DSTAT. Results. Interventions targeting either physician or patient were equally successful (d = +0.1894 and d = +0.1756, respectively). However, studies targeting both physician and patient demonstrated a smaller effect size (d = +0.0514). Greater success was found for interventions targeting the physician both during and outside the patient visit (d = +0.1222 during visit, d = +0.1849 outside visit, d = +0.3375 both). Similarly, screening behavior improved when the physicians were the target of more than one, but not more than three, interventions (d = +0.1360, d = +0.2495, d = +0.6829, d = -0.0058). Conclusions. Cancer screening activities increase with interventions that target either the physician or the patient and, when physicians are targeted, multiple interventions to serve as behavior cues and increase awareness appear optimal.

AB - Background. Primary care physicians believe preventive services are important, but perform these activities infrequently. Numerous studies have attempted to increase cancer screening, employing a variety of interventions with varying results. Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to identify effective office-based interventions for increasing cancer screening. Selected studies: (a) evaluated an intervention in a primary care setting, (b) addressed screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer, and (c) reported results allowing calculation of an effect size. Study qualities and results were coded, entered, and analyzed using DSTAT. Results. Interventions targeting either physician or patient were equally successful (d = +0.1894 and d = +0.1756, respectively). However, studies targeting both physician and patient demonstrated a smaller effect size (d = +0.0514). Greater success was found for interventions targeting the physician both during and outside the patient visit (d = +0.1222 during visit, d = +0.1849 outside visit, d = +0.3375 both). Similarly, screening behavior improved when the physicians were the target of more than one, but not more than three, interventions (d = +0.1360, d = +0.2495, d = +0.6829, d = -0.0058). Conclusions. Cancer screening activities increase with interventions that target either the physician or the patient and, when physicians are targeted, multiple interventions to serve as behavior cues and increase awareness appear optimal.

KW - preventive medicine

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030296568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030296568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.1996.0109

DO - 10.1006/pmed.1996.0109

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 702

EP - 707

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 6

ER -