TY - JOUR
T1 - Incremental cost of complications in colectomy
T2 - A warranty guided approach to surgical quality improvement
AU - Asgeirsson, Theodor
AU - Jebri, Nezar
AU - Feo, Leandro
AU - Kerwel, Therese
AU - Luchtefeld, Martin
AU - Senagore, Anthony J.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Background We assessed the warranty cost for colectomy at a single institution, as defined by the additional cost of treating complications distributed across all patients treated. Methods All segmental colectomies from July 8 to June 12 were reviewed for 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 complications. Warranty cost is defined as follows: ([mean additional cost of the case with complication(s) - mean base case cost] × number of episodes)/total population. Results Thousand four hundred twenty-two colectomies were analyzed. The lowest cost case was a laparoscopic resection with 0 complications ($7,739 ± 4,150). Warranty costs were less for laparoscopic versus open colectomy (0 - $0, 1 - $128, 2 - $66, ≥3 - $248 vs 0 - $1,036, 1 - $501, 2 - $520, ≥3 - $1,971). This was true for costs associated with readmission ($303 vs $1,519). Emergency status and elderly status also impacted warranty costs. Conclusions The data demonstrate that warranty costs were highest with open colectomy, emergency cases, and the elderly. These data can be used to measure both quality and cost impact of mitigation strategies.
AB - Background We assessed the warranty cost for colectomy at a single institution, as defined by the additional cost of treating complications distributed across all patients treated. Methods All segmental colectomies from July 8 to June 12 were reviewed for 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 complications. Warranty cost is defined as follows: ([mean additional cost of the case with complication(s) - mean base case cost] × number of episodes)/total population. Results Thousand four hundred twenty-two colectomies were analyzed. The lowest cost case was a laparoscopic resection with 0 complications ($7,739 ± 4,150). Warranty costs were less for laparoscopic versus open colectomy (0 - $0, 1 - $128, 2 - $66, ≥3 - $248 vs 0 - $1,036, 1 - $501, 2 - $520, ≥3 - $1,971). This was true for costs associated with readmission ($303 vs $1,519). Emergency status and elderly status also impacted warranty costs. Conclusions The data demonstrate that warranty costs were highest with open colectomy, emergency cases, and the elderly. These data can be used to measure both quality and cost impact of mitigation strategies.
KW - Colectomy
KW - Complication
KW - Cost
KW - Surgical Quality
KW - Warranty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895419014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895419014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.11.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 24581768
AN - SCOPUS:84895419014
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 207
SP - 422
EP - 426
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -