TY - JOUR
T1 - Individualized PEEP to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery
T2 - a pilot randomised controlled trial
AU - Fernandez-Bustamante, Ana
AU - Sprung, Juraj
AU - Parker, Robert A.
AU - Bartels, Karsten
AU - Weingarten, Toby N.
AU - Kosour, Carolina
AU - Thompson, B. Taylor
AU - Vidal Melo, Marcos F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Background: Higher intraoperative driving pressures (ΔP) are associated with increased postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We hypothesised that dynamic adjustment of PEEP throughout abdominal surgery reduces ΔP, maintains positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (Ptp_ee) and increases respiratory system static compliance (Crs) with PEEP levels that are variable between and within patients. Methods: In a prospective multicentre pilot study, adults at moderate/high risk for PPC undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomised to one of three ventilation protocols: (1) PEEP≤2 cm H2O, compared with periodic recruitment manoeuvres followed by individualised PEEP to either optimise respiratory system compliance (PEEPmaxCrs) or maintain positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PEEPPtp_ee). The composite primary outcome included intraoperative ΔP, Ptp_ee, Crs, and PEEP values (median (interquartile range) and coefficients of variation [CVPEEP]). Results: Thirty-seven patients (48.6% female; age range: 47–73 yr) were assigned to control (PEEP≤2 cm H2O; n=13), PEEPmaxCrs (n=16), or PEEPPtp_ee (n=8) groups. The PEEPPtp_ee intervention could not be delivered in two patients. Subjects assigned to PEEPmaxCrs had lower ΔP (median8 cm H2O [7–10]), compared with the control group (12 cm H2O [10–15]; P=0.006). PEEPmaxCrs was also associated with higher Ptp_ee (2.0 cm H2O [-0.7 to 4.5] vs controls: -8.3 cm H2O [-13.0 to -4.0]; P≤0.001) and higher Crs (47.7 ml cm H2O [43.2–68.8] vs controls: 39.0 ml cm H2O [32.9–43.4]; P=0.009). Individualised PEEP (PEEPmaxCrs and PEEPPtp_ee combined) varied widely (median: 10 cm H2O [8-15]; CVPEEP=0.24 [0.14–0.35]), both between, and within, subjects throughout surgery. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that individualised PEEP management strategies applied during abdominal surgery reduce driving pressure, maintain positive Ptp_ee and increase static compliance. The wide range of PEEP observed suggests that an individualised approach is required to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery. Clinical trial registration: NCT02671721.
AB - Background: Higher intraoperative driving pressures (ΔP) are associated with increased postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We hypothesised that dynamic adjustment of PEEP throughout abdominal surgery reduces ΔP, maintains positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (Ptp_ee) and increases respiratory system static compliance (Crs) with PEEP levels that are variable between and within patients. Methods: In a prospective multicentre pilot study, adults at moderate/high risk for PPC undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomised to one of three ventilation protocols: (1) PEEP≤2 cm H2O, compared with periodic recruitment manoeuvres followed by individualised PEEP to either optimise respiratory system compliance (PEEPmaxCrs) or maintain positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PEEPPtp_ee). The composite primary outcome included intraoperative ΔP, Ptp_ee, Crs, and PEEP values (median (interquartile range) and coefficients of variation [CVPEEP]). Results: Thirty-seven patients (48.6% female; age range: 47–73 yr) were assigned to control (PEEP≤2 cm H2O; n=13), PEEPmaxCrs (n=16), or PEEPPtp_ee (n=8) groups. The PEEPPtp_ee intervention could not be delivered in two patients. Subjects assigned to PEEPmaxCrs had lower ΔP (median8 cm H2O [7–10]), compared with the control group (12 cm H2O [10–15]; P=0.006). PEEPmaxCrs was also associated with higher Ptp_ee (2.0 cm H2O [-0.7 to 4.5] vs controls: -8.3 cm H2O [-13.0 to -4.0]; P≤0.001) and higher Crs (47.7 ml cm H2O [43.2–68.8] vs controls: 39.0 ml cm H2O [32.9–43.4]; P=0.009). Individualised PEEP (PEEPmaxCrs and PEEPPtp_ee combined) varied widely (median: 10 cm H2O [8-15]; CVPEEP=0.24 [0.14–0.35]), both between, and within, subjects throughout surgery. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that individualised PEEP management strategies applied during abdominal surgery reduce driving pressure, maintain positive Ptp_ee and increase static compliance. The wide range of PEEP observed suggests that an individualised approach is required to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery. Clinical trial registration: NCT02671721.
KW - lung compliance
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - positive end-expiratory pressure
KW - postoperative pulmonary complications
KW - respiratory mechanics
KW - ventilator-induced lung injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087944583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087944583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.030
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 32682559
AN - SCOPUS:85087944583
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 125
SP - 383
EP - 392
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 3
ER -