Influence of feedback schedule in motor performance and learning of a lumbar multifidus muscle task using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: A randomized clinical trial

Wendy J. Herbert, Deborah Givens Heiss, D. Michele Basso

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) may be associated with inadequate multifidus muscle function. Varying the frequency and timing of feedback may enhance acquisition and retention of multifidus muscle recruitment during exercise. Subjects: Subjects without LBP (n=30) were randomly assigned to a constant (CON) or variable (VAR) feedback group. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age=28 years, SD=8.0; mean body mass index=24 kg/m2, SD=0.70) completed training, and 23 completed retention testing. Methods: Eight training sessions over 4 weeks included multifidus muscle exercise with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) feedback. Retention was assessed at 1 week and ≥1 month. Results: At the start, both groups had similar performances of multifidus muscle recruitment (Fisher exact test, P=.26). Early in training, the CON group had good success (mean=80%) that was maintained at session 8 (mean=84%), with no difference between sessions 1 and 8 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-9%, 42%). The VAR group gradually increased success (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.002, 95% CI=17%, 59%) between sessions 1 and 8. Both groups sustained their session 8 success when tested for short-term retention at 1 week (CON group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.79; VAR group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.36). At the long-term retention test, the VAR group outperformed the CON group (Wilcoxon score test, P=.04), indicating superior motor learning. Discussion and Conclusion: Variable feedback provided by RUSI resulted in greater success in lumbar multifidus muscle recruitment up to 3 to 4 months after training.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)261-269
    Number of pages9
    JournalPhysical Therapy
    Volume88
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2008

    Fingerprint

    Paraspinal Muscles
    Ultrasonography
    Appointments and Schedules
    Nonparametric Statistics
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Learning
    Muscles
    Low Back Pain
    Confidence Intervals
    Body Mass Index

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Health Professions(all)
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Cite this

    Influence of feedback schedule in motor performance and learning of a lumbar multifidus muscle task using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging : A randomized clinical trial. / Herbert, Wendy J.; Heiss, Deborah Givens; Basso, D. Michele.

    In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 88, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 261-269.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{a6bc4989a1e447549d02347a4e311815,
    title = "Influence of feedback schedule in motor performance and learning of a lumbar multifidus muscle task using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: A randomized clinical trial",
    abstract = "Background and Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) may be associated with inadequate multifidus muscle function. Varying the frequency and timing of feedback may enhance acquisition and retention of multifidus muscle recruitment during exercise. Subjects: Subjects without LBP (n=30) were randomly assigned to a constant (CON) or variable (VAR) feedback group. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age=28 years, SD=8.0; mean body mass index=24 kg/m2, SD=0.70) completed training, and 23 completed retention testing. Methods: Eight training sessions over 4 weeks included multifidus muscle exercise with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) feedback. Retention was assessed at 1 week and ≥1 month. Results: At the start, both groups had similar performances of multifidus muscle recruitment (Fisher exact test, P=.26). Early in training, the CON group had good success (mean=80{\%}) that was maintained at session 8 (mean=84{\%}), with no difference between sessions 1 and 8 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.19, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]=-9{\%}, 42{\%}). The VAR group gradually increased success (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.002, 95{\%} CI=17{\%}, 59{\%}) between sessions 1 and 8. Both groups sustained their session 8 success when tested for short-term retention at 1 week (CON group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.79; VAR group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.36). At the long-term retention test, the VAR group outperformed the CON group (Wilcoxon score test, P=.04), indicating superior motor learning. Discussion and Conclusion: Variable feedback provided by RUSI resulted in greater success in lumbar multifidus muscle recruitment up to 3 to 4 months after training.",
    author = "Herbert, {Wendy J.} and Heiss, {Deborah Givens} and Basso, {D. Michele}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.2522/ptj.20060308",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "88",
    pages = "261--269",
    journal = "Physical Therapy",
    issn = "0031-9023",
    publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Influence of feedback schedule in motor performance and learning of a lumbar multifidus muscle task using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging

    T2 - A randomized clinical trial

    AU - Herbert, Wendy J.

    AU - Heiss, Deborah Givens

    AU - Basso, D. Michele

    PY - 2008/2

    Y1 - 2008/2

    N2 - Background and Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) may be associated with inadequate multifidus muscle function. Varying the frequency and timing of feedback may enhance acquisition and retention of multifidus muscle recruitment during exercise. Subjects: Subjects without LBP (n=30) were randomly assigned to a constant (CON) or variable (VAR) feedback group. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age=28 years, SD=8.0; mean body mass index=24 kg/m2, SD=0.70) completed training, and 23 completed retention testing. Methods: Eight training sessions over 4 weeks included multifidus muscle exercise with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) feedback. Retention was assessed at 1 week and ≥1 month. Results: At the start, both groups had similar performances of multifidus muscle recruitment (Fisher exact test, P=.26). Early in training, the CON group had good success (mean=80%) that was maintained at session 8 (mean=84%), with no difference between sessions 1 and 8 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-9%, 42%). The VAR group gradually increased success (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.002, 95% CI=17%, 59%) between sessions 1 and 8. Both groups sustained their session 8 success when tested for short-term retention at 1 week (CON group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.79; VAR group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.36). At the long-term retention test, the VAR group outperformed the CON group (Wilcoxon score test, P=.04), indicating superior motor learning. Discussion and Conclusion: Variable feedback provided by RUSI resulted in greater success in lumbar multifidus muscle recruitment up to 3 to 4 months after training.

    AB - Background and Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) may be associated with inadequate multifidus muscle function. Varying the frequency and timing of feedback may enhance acquisition and retention of multifidus muscle recruitment during exercise. Subjects: Subjects without LBP (n=30) were randomly assigned to a constant (CON) or variable (VAR) feedback group. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age=28 years, SD=8.0; mean body mass index=24 kg/m2, SD=0.70) completed training, and 23 completed retention testing. Methods: Eight training sessions over 4 weeks included multifidus muscle exercise with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) feedback. Retention was assessed at 1 week and ≥1 month. Results: At the start, both groups had similar performances of multifidus muscle recruitment (Fisher exact test, P=.26). Early in training, the CON group had good success (mean=80%) that was maintained at session 8 (mean=84%), with no difference between sessions 1 and 8 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-9%, 42%). The VAR group gradually increased success (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.002, 95% CI=17%, 59%) between sessions 1 and 8. Both groups sustained their session 8 success when tested for short-term retention at 1 week (CON group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.79; VAR group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.36). At the long-term retention test, the VAR group outperformed the CON group (Wilcoxon score test, P=.04), indicating superior motor learning. Discussion and Conclusion: Variable feedback provided by RUSI resulted in greater success in lumbar multifidus muscle recruitment up to 3 to 4 months after training.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849119122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849119122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.2522/ptj.20060308

    DO - 10.2522/ptj.20060308

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 18042655

    AN - SCOPUS:38849119122

    VL - 88

    SP - 261

    EP - 269

    JO - Physical Therapy

    JF - Physical Therapy

    SN - 0031-9023

    IS - 2

    ER -