Informal caregivers’ burden and stress in caring for stroke survivors with spatial neglect

An exploratory mixed-method study

Peii Chen, Denise C. Fyffe, Kimberly Hreha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Spatial neglect prolongs stroke survivors’ recovery to independence. However, little is known about the impact of spatial neglect on caregivers of stroke survivors: To explore the factors associated with burden and stress among informal caregivers of stroke survivors with spatial neglect. Methods: Following the previous study of 108 stroke survivors, we reached 24 stroke survivors’ caregivers, and 20 caregivers (age: M±SD=56.9±12.7 years; 12 females) completed the study. 10 survivors had symptoms of spatial neglect, and 10 did not (i.e., SN+ or SN-, respectively) at the time when discharged from inpatient ehabilitation, which was 9.3±6.2 months before the present study. Via a semi structured telephone interview, we assessed caregivers’ burden and stress qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: No difference was observed across caregiver groups in cognitive function, depressive mood, or community mobility. In comparison, caregivers of the SN+ group allocated more time to care, controlling for survivors’ disability (adjusted effective size d = 1.80). Their self-perceived burden and stress were more severe than the other group (adjusted d =.99). Qualitative analysis indicated caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to describe economic stressors and undesirable changes in career and vacation planning. While 80% of participants preferred their care recipients to receive additional motor or mobility therapy, caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to suggest additional therapy for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that spatial neglect may heighten caregivers’ burden and stress levels. Future studies with a large sample size are required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-33
Number of pages10
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Survivors
Stroke
Sample Size
Cognition
Inpatients
Economics
Interviews
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Caregiver stress
  • Caregiving
  • Dependency burden
  • Spatial neglect
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Community and Home Care
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Informal caregivers’ burden and stress in caring for stroke survivors with spatial neglect : An exploratory mixed-method study. / Chen, Peii; Fyffe, Denise C.; Hreha, Kimberly.

In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 24-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{029d0d3066aa4069ae665dbfa7a6aa44,
title = "Informal caregivers’ burden and stress in caring for stroke survivors with spatial neglect: An exploratory mixed-method study",
abstract = "Background: Spatial neglect prolongs stroke survivors’ recovery to independence. However, little is known about the impact of spatial neglect on caregivers of stroke survivors: To explore the factors associated with burden and stress among informal caregivers of stroke survivors with spatial neglect. Methods: Following the previous study of 108 stroke survivors, we reached 24 stroke survivors’ caregivers, and 20 caregivers (age: M±SD=56.9±12.7 years; 12 females) completed the study. 10 survivors had symptoms of spatial neglect, and 10 did not (i.e., SN+ or SN-, respectively) at the time when discharged from inpatient ehabilitation, which was 9.3±6.2 months before the present study. Via a semi structured telephone interview, we assessed caregivers’ burden and stress qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: No difference was observed across caregiver groups in cognitive function, depressive mood, or community mobility. In comparison, caregivers of the SN+ group allocated more time to care, controlling for survivors’ disability (adjusted effective size d = 1.80). Their self-perceived burden and stress were more severe than the other group (adjusted d =.99). Qualitative analysis indicated caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to describe economic stressors and undesirable changes in career and vacation planning. While 80{\%} of participants preferred their care recipients to receive additional motor or mobility therapy, caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to suggest additional therapy for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that spatial neglect may heighten caregivers’ burden and stress levels. Future studies with a large sample size are required.",
keywords = "Caregiver stress, Caregiving, Dependency burden, Spatial neglect, Stroke",
author = "Peii Chen and Fyffe, {Denise C.} and Kimberly Hreha",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10749357.2016.1186373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "24--33",
journal = "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",
issn = "1074-9357",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informal caregivers’ burden and stress in caring for stroke survivors with spatial neglect

T2 - An exploratory mixed-method study

AU - Chen, Peii

AU - Fyffe, Denise C.

AU - Hreha, Kimberly

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Spatial neglect prolongs stroke survivors’ recovery to independence. However, little is known about the impact of spatial neglect on caregivers of stroke survivors: To explore the factors associated with burden and stress among informal caregivers of stroke survivors with spatial neglect. Methods: Following the previous study of 108 stroke survivors, we reached 24 stroke survivors’ caregivers, and 20 caregivers (age: M±SD=56.9±12.7 years; 12 females) completed the study. 10 survivors had symptoms of spatial neglect, and 10 did not (i.e., SN+ or SN-, respectively) at the time when discharged from inpatient ehabilitation, which was 9.3±6.2 months before the present study. Via a semi structured telephone interview, we assessed caregivers’ burden and stress qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: No difference was observed across caregiver groups in cognitive function, depressive mood, or community mobility. In comparison, caregivers of the SN+ group allocated more time to care, controlling for survivors’ disability (adjusted effective size d = 1.80). Their self-perceived burden and stress were more severe than the other group (adjusted d =.99). Qualitative analysis indicated caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to describe economic stressors and undesirable changes in career and vacation planning. While 80% of participants preferred their care recipients to receive additional motor or mobility therapy, caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to suggest additional therapy for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that spatial neglect may heighten caregivers’ burden and stress levels. Future studies with a large sample size are required.

AB - Background: Spatial neglect prolongs stroke survivors’ recovery to independence. However, little is known about the impact of spatial neglect on caregivers of stroke survivors: To explore the factors associated with burden and stress among informal caregivers of stroke survivors with spatial neglect. Methods: Following the previous study of 108 stroke survivors, we reached 24 stroke survivors’ caregivers, and 20 caregivers (age: M±SD=56.9±12.7 years; 12 females) completed the study. 10 survivors had symptoms of spatial neglect, and 10 did not (i.e., SN+ or SN-, respectively) at the time when discharged from inpatient ehabilitation, which was 9.3±6.2 months before the present study. Via a semi structured telephone interview, we assessed caregivers’ burden and stress qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: No difference was observed across caregiver groups in cognitive function, depressive mood, or community mobility. In comparison, caregivers of the SN+ group allocated more time to care, controlling for survivors’ disability (adjusted effective size d = 1.80). Their self-perceived burden and stress were more severe than the other group (adjusted d =.99). Qualitative analysis indicated caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to describe economic stressors and undesirable changes in career and vacation planning. While 80% of participants preferred their care recipients to receive additional motor or mobility therapy, caregivers of the SN+ group were more likely to suggest additional therapy for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that spatial neglect may heighten caregivers’ burden and stress levels. Future studies with a large sample size are required.

KW - Caregiver stress

KW - Caregiving

KW - Dependency burden

KW - Spatial neglect

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034615043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034615043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10749357.2016.1186373

DO - 10.1080/10749357.2016.1186373

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 24

EP - 33

JO - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

SN - 1074-9357

IS - 1

ER -