Informed consent in psychiatric research

Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation

Paul R. Benson, Loren H. Roth, William Winslade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preliminary findings from an investigation of informed consent processes in four psychiatric research projects (two being carried out at a university medical center and two at a public psychiatric hospital) are reported. Study methods include the systematic observation of investigator/subject information disclosure sessions using audio and videotape, as well as the use of standardized interaction rating forms and subject understanding interviews. In an attempt to determine if subjects' understanding of research can be improved through increased subject education, several modes of information disclosure are compared. Partial results from the public psychiatric hospital portion of the investigation suggest low subject understanding in many areas with subjects often demonstrating difficulty differentiating between treatment and biomedical research. Subjects' problematic understanding of research purposes and methodology was compounded by investigator disclosures which often emphasized the therapeutic, personalistic and nonresearch-oriented aspects of the project. Nevertheless, even when information disclosures were significantly improved, subject understanding in many cases continued to be low- suggesting that additional factors aside from the quality of investigator disclosure are involved in psychiatric subjects' comprehension and understanding of research. The implication of these findings for informed consent, regulation of biomedical research and the protection of human subjects are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1331-1341
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Disclosure
Informed Consent
Psychiatry
Research
Public Hospitals
Research Personnel
Psychiatric Hospitals
Biomedical Research
study method
Videotape Recording
psychiatric hospital
Research Design
Observation
Informed consent
education
Interviews
Education
methodology
Information disclosure
comprehension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Development
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Informed consent in psychiatric research : Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation. / Benson, Paul R.; Roth, Loren H.; Winslade, William.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1985, p. 1331-1341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cdadcbc5267544a5b42f109311cc542a,
title = "Informed consent in psychiatric research: Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation",
abstract = "Preliminary findings from an investigation of informed consent processes in four psychiatric research projects (two being carried out at a university medical center and two at a public psychiatric hospital) are reported. Study methods include the systematic observation of investigator/subject information disclosure sessions using audio and videotape, as well as the use of standardized interaction rating forms and subject understanding interviews. In an attempt to determine if subjects' understanding of research can be improved through increased subject education, several modes of information disclosure are compared. Partial results from the public psychiatric hospital portion of the investigation suggest low subject understanding in many areas with subjects often demonstrating difficulty differentiating between treatment and biomedical research. Subjects' problematic understanding of research purposes and methodology was compounded by investigator disclosures which often emphasized the therapeutic, personalistic and nonresearch-oriented aspects of the project. Nevertheless, even when information disclosures were significantly improved, subject understanding in many cases continued to be low- suggesting that additional factors aside from the quality of investigator disclosure are involved in psychiatric subjects' comprehension and understanding of research. The implication of these findings for informed consent, regulation of biomedical research and the protection of human subjects are discussed.",
author = "Benson, {Paul R.} and Roth, {Loren H.} and William Winslade",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/0277-9536(85)90388-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1331--1341",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informed consent in psychiatric research

T2 - Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation

AU - Benson, Paul R.

AU - Roth, Loren H.

AU - Winslade, William

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Preliminary findings from an investigation of informed consent processes in four psychiatric research projects (two being carried out at a university medical center and two at a public psychiatric hospital) are reported. Study methods include the systematic observation of investigator/subject information disclosure sessions using audio and videotape, as well as the use of standardized interaction rating forms and subject understanding interviews. In an attempt to determine if subjects' understanding of research can be improved through increased subject education, several modes of information disclosure are compared. Partial results from the public psychiatric hospital portion of the investigation suggest low subject understanding in many areas with subjects often demonstrating difficulty differentiating between treatment and biomedical research. Subjects' problematic understanding of research purposes and methodology was compounded by investigator disclosures which often emphasized the therapeutic, personalistic and nonresearch-oriented aspects of the project. Nevertheless, even when information disclosures were significantly improved, subject understanding in many cases continued to be low- suggesting that additional factors aside from the quality of investigator disclosure are involved in psychiatric subjects' comprehension and understanding of research. The implication of these findings for informed consent, regulation of biomedical research and the protection of human subjects are discussed.

AB - Preliminary findings from an investigation of informed consent processes in four psychiatric research projects (two being carried out at a university medical center and two at a public psychiatric hospital) are reported. Study methods include the systematic observation of investigator/subject information disclosure sessions using audio and videotape, as well as the use of standardized interaction rating forms and subject understanding interviews. In an attempt to determine if subjects' understanding of research can be improved through increased subject education, several modes of information disclosure are compared. Partial results from the public psychiatric hospital portion of the investigation suggest low subject understanding in many areas with subjects often demonstrating difficulty differentiating between treatment and biomedical research. Subjects' problematic understanding of research purposes and methodology was compounded by investigator disclosures which often emphasized the therapeutic, personalistic and nonresearch-oriented aspects of the project. Nevertheless, even when information disclosures were significantly improved, subject understanding in many cases continued to be low- suggesting that additional factors aside from the quality of investigator disclosure are involved in psychiatric subjects' comprehension and understanding of research. The implication of these findings for informed consent, regulation of biomedical research and the protection of human subjects are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022391484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022391484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90388-0

DO - 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90388-0

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1331

EP - 1341

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 12

ER -