Inhibition and excitation of the nociceptive flexion reflex by conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the cat

Hong Kee Shin, Jun Kim, Jin Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A previous study in our laboratory showed a long-lasting, naloxone-reversible inhibition of the flexion reflex after prolonged repetitive stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the spinal cat. The present study employed a special pattern of conditioning stimulation for a shorter period (200 s) to determine the time course of the inhibition and the afferent fibers responsible for the inhibition. We stimulated the common peroneal nerve in 10 decerebrated and spinalized cats to elicit the flexion reflex, which we recorded as single-unit activity from filaments of the L7 ventral root. The C fiber-evoked late component of the flexion reflex was compared before, during, and after conditioning electrical stimulation applied to the tibial nerve. Stimulating the tibial nerve at an intensity that excited only Aαβ fibers produced weak inhibition of the flexion reflex; increasing intensity above the threshold for Aδ fibers produced much greater inhibition. Inhibition began during the first 10 s of conditioning stimulation and was maximum at about 100 s. Stimulation at a suprathreshold intensity for C fibers, however, produced an initial transient excitation, lasting 10 to 20 s, followed by inhibition. Intravenous injection of naloxone (0.05 mg/kg) produced no observable changes in this inhibition and excitation. These results suggest that conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve inhibits the flexion reflex. This inhibition has a short latency; the afferent fibers seem to be Aδ fibers. In addition, input from afferent C fibers may trigger a mechanism that produces facilitation of the reflex. The differences in recovery time course and in sensitivity to naloxone suggest that two different mechanisms may be responsible for the fast-onset inhibition and the previously observed long-lasting inhibition produced after prolonged conditioning stimulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-348
Number of pages14
JournalExperimental Neurology
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Peripheral Nerves
Reflex
Cats
Myelinated Nerve Fibers
Unmyelinated Nerve Fibers
Naloxone
Tibial Nerve
Conditioning (Psychology)
Inhibition (Psychology)
Peroneal Nerve
Spinal Nerve Roots
Intravenous Injections
Electric Stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neurology

Cite this

Inhibition and excitation of the nociceptive flexion reflex by conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the cat. / Shin, Hong Kee; Kim, Jun; Chung, Jin.

In: Experimental Neurology, Vol. 92, No. 2, 1986, p. 335-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e373a4d9ddd44828d64341eb925a1f6,
title = "Inhibition and excitation of the nociceptive flexion reflex by conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the cat",
abstract = "A previous study in our laboratory showed a long-lasting, naloxone-reversible inhibition of the flexion reflex after prolonged repetitive stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the spinal cat. The present study employed a special pattern of conditioning stimulation for a shorter period (200 s) to determine the time course of the inhibition and the afferent fibers responsible for the inhibition. We stimulated the common peroneal nerve in 10 decerebrated and spinalized cats to elicit the flexion reflex, which we recorded as single-unit activity from filaments of the L7 ventral root. The C fiber-evoked late component of the flexion reflex was compared before, during, and after conditioning electrical stimulation applied to the tibial nerve. Stimulating the tibial nerve at an intensity that excited only Aαβ fibers produced weak inhibition of the flexion reflex; increasing intensity above the threshold for Aδ fibers produced much greater inhibition. Inhibition began during the first 10 s of conditioning stimulation and was maximum at about 100 s. Stimulation at a suprathreshold intensity for C fibers, however, produced an initial transient excitation, lasting 10 to 20 s, followed by inhibition. Intravenous injection of naloxone (0.05 mg/kg) produced no observable changes in this inhibition and excitation. These results suggest that conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve inhibits the flexion reflex. This inhibition has a short latency; the afferent fibers seem to be Aδ fibers. In addition, input from afferent C fibers may trigger a mechanism that produces facilitation of the reflex. The differences in recovery time course and in sensitivity to naloxone suggest that two different mechanisms may be responsible for the fast-onset inhibition and the previously observed long-lasting inhibition produced after prolonged conditioning stimulation.",
author = "Shin, {Hong Kee} and Jun Kim and Jin Chung",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1016/0014-4886(86)90085-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "335--348",
journal = "Experimental Neurology",
issn = "0014-4886",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibition and excitation of the nociceptive flexion reflex by conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the cat

AU - Shin, Hong Kee

AU - Kim, Jun

AU - Chung, Jin

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - A previous study in our laboratory showed a long-lasting, naloxone-reversible inhibition of the flexion reflex after prolonged repetitive stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the spinal cat. The present study employed a special pattern of conditioning stimulation for a shorter period (200 s) to determine the time course of the inhibition and the afferent fibers responsible for the inhibition. We stimulated the common peroneal nerve in 10 decerebrated and spinalized cats to elicit the flexion reflex, which we recorded as single-unit activity from filaments of the L7 ventral root. The C fiber-evoked late component of the flexion reflex was compared before, during, and after conditioning electrical stimulation applied to the tibial nerve. Stimulating the tibial nerve at an intensity that excited only Aαβ fibers produced weak inhibition of the flexion reflex; increasing intensity above the threshold for Aδ fibers produced much greater inhibition. Inhibition began during the first 10 s of conditioning stimulation and was maximum at about 100 s. Stimulation at a suprathreshold intensity for C fibers, however, produced an initial transient excitation, lasting 10 to 20 s, followed by inhibition. Intravenous injection of naloxone (0.05 mg/kg) produced no observable changes in this inhibition and excitation. These results suggest that conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve inhibits the flexion reflex. This inhibition has a short latency; the afferent fibers seem to be Aδ fibers. In addition, input from afferent C fibers may trigger a mechanism that produces facilitation of the reflex. The differences in recovery time course and in sensitivity to naloxone suggest that two different mechanisms may be responsible for the fast-onset inhibition and the previously observed long-lasting inhibition produced after prolonged conditioning stimulation.

AB - A previous study in our laboratory showed a long-lasting, naloxone-reversible inhibition of the flexion reflex after prolonged repetitive stimulation of a peripheral nerve in the spinal cat. The present study employed a special pattern of conditioning stimulation for a shorter period (200 s) to determine the time course of the inhibition and the afferent fibers responsible for the inhibition. We stimulated the common peroneal nerve in 10 decerebrated and spinalized cats to elicit the flexion reflex, which we recorded as single-unit activity from filaments of the L7 ventral root. The C fiber-evoked late component of the flexion reflex was compared before, during, and after conditioning electrical stimulation applied to the tibial nerve. Stimulating the tibial nerve at an intensity that excited only Aαβ fibers produced weak inhibition of the flexion reflex; increasing intensity above the threshold for Aδ fibers produced much greater inhibition. Inhibition began during the first 10 s of conditioning stimulation and was maximum at about 100 s. Stimulation at a suprathreshold intensity for C fibers, however, produced an initial transient excitation, lasting 10 to 20 s, followed by inhibition. Intravenous injection of naloxone (0.05 mg/kg) produced no observable changes in this inhibition and excitation. These results suggest that conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve inhibits the flexion reflex. This inhibition has a short latency; the afferent fibers seem to be Aδ fibers. In addition, input from afferent C fibers may trigger a mechanism that produces facilitation of the reflex. The differences in recovery time course and in sensitivity to naloxone suggest that two different mechanisms may be responsible for the fast-onset inhibition and the previously observed long-lasting inhibition produced after prolonged conditioning stimulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022596020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022596020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0014-4886(86)90085-3

DO - 10.1016/0014-4886(86)90085-3

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 335

EP - 348

JO - Experimental Neurology

JF - Experimental Neurology

SN - 0014-4886

IS - 2

ER -