Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses: Commonalities and distinctions

Ivan V. Kuzmin, Toni M. Schwarz, Philipp A. Ilinykh, Ingo Jordan, Thomas Ksiazek, Ravi Sachidanandam, Christopher F. Basler, Alexander Bukreyev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marburg (MARV) and Ebola (EBOV) viruses are zoonotic pathogens that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. The natural reservoir of MARV is the Egyptian rousette bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus); that of EBOV is unknown but believed to be another bat species. The Egyptian rousette develops subclinical productive infection with MARV but is refractory to EBOV. Interaction of filoviruses with hosts is greatly affected by the viral interferon (IFN)-inhibiting domains (IID). Our study was aimed at characterization of innate immune responses to filoviruses and the role of filovirus IID in bat and human cells. The study demonstrated that EBOV and MARV replicate to similar levels in all tested cell lines, indicating that permissiveness for EBOV at cell and organism levels do not necessarily correlate. Filoviruses, particularly MARV, induced a potent innate immune response in rousette cells, which was generally stronger than that in human cells. Both EBOV VP35 and VP24 IID were found to suppress the innate immune response in rousette cells, but only VP35 IID appeared to promote virus replication. Along with IFN-α and IFN-β, IFN-γ was demonstrated to control filovirus infection in bat cells but not in human cells, suggesting host species specificity of the antiviral effect. The antiviral effects of bat IFNs appeared not to correlate with induction of IFN-stimulated genes 54 and 56, which were detected in human cells ectopically expressing bat IFN-α and IFN-β. As bat IFN-γ induced the type I IFN pathway, its antiviral effect is likely to be partially induced via cross talk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere02471-16
JournalJournal of Virology
Volume91
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Filoviridae
interferons
Innate Immunity
Chiroptera
Interferons
cells
Antiviral Agents
Interferon Type I
Permissiveness
Ebolavirus
Rousettus
Asymptomatic Infections
innate immunity
Host Specificity
Zoonoses
Infection Control
Virus Replication
virus replication
infection
fever

Keywords

  • Accidental host
  • Bat
  • Ebola virus
  • Immune evasion
  • Interferon-inhibiting domain
  • Interferons
  • Marburg virus
  • Natural host

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Virology

Cite this

Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses : Commonalities and distinctions. / Kuzmin, Ivan V.; Schwarz, Toni M.; Ilinykh, Philipp A.; Jordan, Ingo; Ksiazek, Thomas; Sachidanandam, Ravi; Basler, Christopher F.; Bukreyev, Alexander.

In: Journal of Virology, Vol. 91, No. 8, e02471-16, 01.04.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuzmin, IV, Schwarz, TM, Ilinykh, PA, Jordan, I, Ksiazek, T, Sachidanandam, R, Basler, CF & Bukreyev, A 2017, 'Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses: Commonalities and distinctions', Journal of Virology, vol. 91, no. 8, e02471-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02471-16
Kuzmin, Ivan V. ; Schwarz, Toni M. ; Ilinykh, Philipp A. ; Jordan, Ingo ; Ksiazek, Thomas ; Sachidanandam, Ravi ; Basler, Christopher F. ; Bukreyev, Alexander. / Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses : Commonalities and distinctions. In: Journal of Virology. 2017 ; Vol. 91, No. 8.
@article{39eaf922380d4f9c90b03599eb26fdb3,
title = "Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses: Commonalities and distinctions",
abstract = "Marburg (MARV) and Ebola (EBOV) viruses are zoonotic pathogens that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. The natural reservoir of MARV is the Egyptian rousette bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus); that of EBOV is unknown but believed to be another bat species. The Egyptian rousette develops subclinical productive infection with MARV but is refractory to EBOV. Interaction of filoviruses with hosts is greatly affected by the viral interferon (IFN)-inhibiting domains (IID). Our study was aimed at characterization of innate immune responses to filoviruses and the role of filovirus IID in bat and human cells. The study demonstrated that EBOV and MARV replicate to similar levels in all tested cell lines, indicating that permissiveness for EBOV at cell and organism levels do not necessarily correlate. Filoviruses, particularly MARV, induced a potent innate immune response in rousette cells, which was generally stronger than that in human cells. Both EBOV VP35 and VP24 IID were found to suppress the innate immune response in rousette cells, but only VP35 IID appeared to promote virus replication. Along with IFN-α and IFN-β, IFN-γ was demonstrated to control filovirus infection in bat cells but not in human cells, suggesting host species specificity of the antiviral effect. The antiviral effects of bat IFNs appeared not to correlate with induction of IFN-stimulated genes 54 and 56, which were detected in human cells ectopically expressing bat IFN-α and IFN-β. As bat IFN-γ induced the type I IFN pathway, its antiviral effect is likely to be partially induced via cross talk.",
keywords = "Accidental host, Bat, Ebola virus, Immune evasion, Interferon-inhibiting domain, Interferons, Marburg virus, Natural host",
author = "Kuzmin, {Ivan V.} and Schwarz, {Toni M.} and Ilinykh, {Philipp A.} and Ingo Jordan and Thomas Ksiazek and Ravi Sachidanandam and Basler, {Christopher F.} and Alexander Bukreyev",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1128/JVI.02471-16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
journal = "Journal of Virology",
issn = "0022-538X",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses

T2 - Commonalities and distinctions

AU - Kuzmin, Ivan V.

AU - Schwarz, Toni M.

AU - Ilinykh, Philipp A.

AU - Jordan, Ingo

AU - Ksiazek, Thomas

AU - Sachidanandam, Ravi

AU - Basler, Christopher F.

AU - Bukreyev, Alexander

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Marburg (MARV) and Ebola (EBOV) viruses are zoonotic pathogens that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. The natural reservoir of MARV is the Egyptian rousette bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus); that of EBOV is unknown but believed to be another bat species. The Egyptian rousette develops subclinical productive infection with MARV but is refractory to EBOV. Interaction of filoviruses with hosts is greatly affected by the viral interferon (IFN)-inhibiting domains (IID). Our study was aimed at characterization of innate immune responses to filoviruses and the role of filovirus IID in bat and human cells. The study demonstrated that EBOV and MARV replicate to similar levels in all tested cell lines, indicating that permissiveness for EBOV at cell and organism levels do not necessarily correlate. Filoviruses, particularly MARV, induced a potent innate immune response in rousette cells, which was generally stronger than that in human cells. Both EBOV VP35 and VP24 IID were found to suppress the innate immune response in rousette cells, but only VP35 IID appeared to promote virus replication. Along with IFN-α and IFN-β, IFN-γ was demonstrated to control filovirus infection in bat cells but not in human cells, suggesting host species specificity of the antiviral effect. The antiviral effects of bat IFNs appeared not to correlate with induction of IFN-stimulated genes 54 and 56, which were detected in human cells ectopically expressing bat IFN-α and IFN-β. As bat IFN-γ induced the type I IFN pathway, its antiviral effect is likely to be partially induced via cross talk.

AB - Marburg (MARV) and Ebola (EBOV) viruses are zoonotic pathogens that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. The natural reservoir of MARV is the Egyptian rousette bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus); that of EBOV is unknown but believed to be another bat species. The Egyptian rousette develops subclinical productive infection with MARV but is refractory to EBOV. Interaction of filoviruses with hosts is greatly affected by the viral interferon (IFN)-inhibiting domains (IID). Our study was aimed at characterization of innate immune responses to filoviruses and the role of filovirus IID in bat and human cells. The study demonstrated that EBOV and MARV replicate to similar levels in all tested cell lines, indicating that permissiveness for EBOV at cell and organism levels do not necessarily correlate. Filoviruses, particularly MARV, induced a potent innate immune response in rousette cells, which was generally stronger than that in human cells. Both EBOV VP35 and VP24 IID were found to suppress the innate immune response in rousette cells, but only VP35 IID appeared to promote virus replication. Along with IFN-α and IFN-β, IFN-γ was demonstrated to control filovirus infection in bat cells but not in human cells, suggesting host species specificity of the antiviral effect. The antiviral effects of bat IFNs appeared not to correlate with induction of IFN-stimulated genes 54 and 56, which were detected in human cells ectopically expressing bat IFN-α and IFN-β. As bat IFN-γ induced the type I IFN pathway, its antiviral effect is likely to be partially induced via cross talk.

KW - Accidental host

KW - Bat

KW - Ebola virus

KW - Immune evasion

KW - Interferon-inhibiting domain

KW - Interferons

KW - Marburg virus

KW - Natural host

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016556123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016556123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1128/JVI.02471-16

DO - 10.1128/JVI.02471-16

M3 - Article

C2 - 28122983

AN - SCOPUS:85016556123

VL - 91

JO - Journal of Virology

JF - Journal of Virology

SN - 0022-538X

IS - 8

M1 - e02471-16

ER -