Insulin sensitivity derived from oral glucose tolerance testing in athletes: Disagreement between available indices

Konstantinos Niakaris, Faidon Magkos, Nikos Geladas, Labros S. Sidossis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to determine whether available "fasting" and oral glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity indices could effectively discriminate between individuals with higher than normal insulin sensitivity, and whether they would all provide similar information in clinical practice. Sprint runners (n = 8), endurance runners (n = 8) and sedentary controls (n = 7) received a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. All participants were healthy lean males, aged 21-29 years. Besides glucose and insulin responses, a total of nine such indices were computed. Fasting as well as post-load glucose concentrations were similar in the three groups, while basal plasma insulin and the insulinaemic response to glucose were both higher in untrained individuals (at P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). There were no differences between endurance and sprint runners. The results for insulin sensitivity, however, were quite variable: three indices showed that both groups of athletes were more insulin-sensitive than controls; three indicated that this was the case for endurance runners only; one indicated that this was the case for sprint runners only; and two showed that sprint runners were more insulin-sensitive than either sedentary individuals or endurance runners (all differences were significant at P < 0.05). Controlling for total body weight or lean mass did not effectively resolve this disagreement. Apparently, the various insulin sensitivity indices examined provided different quantitative and qualitative information, despite insulin action being greater in both groups of athletes relative to controls, as reflected by their similar glucose tolerance with lower insulin concentrations. We suggest, therefore, that the use and interpretation of such indices among physically active individuals be made with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1065-1073
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume23
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glucose Tolerance Test
Athletes
Insulin Resistance
Insulin
Glucose
Fasting
Healthy Volunteers
Body Weight

Keywords

  • Athletes
  • Endurance
  • Glucose tolerance
  • Insulin sensitivity
  • Oral glucose tolerance test
  • Sprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Insulin sensitivity derived from oral glucose tolerance testing in athletes : Disagreement between available indices. / Niakaris, Konstantinos; Magkos, Faidon; Geladas, Nikos; Sidossis, Labros S.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 10, 10.2005, p. 1065-1073.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niakaris, Konstantinos ; Magkos, Faidon ; Geladas, Nikos ; Sidossis, Labros S. / Insulin sensitivity derived from oral glucose tolerance testing in athletes : Disagreement between available indices. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2005 ; Vol. 23, No. 10. pp. 1065-1073.
@article{181d6080ad714114849c30c8742e1fa9,
title = "Insulin sensitivity derived from oral glucose tolerance testing in athletes: Disagreement between available indices",
abstract = "The aims of the present study were to determine whether available {"}fasting{"} and oral glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity indices could effectively discriminate between individuals with higher than normal insulin sensitivity, and whether they would all provide similar information in clinical practice. Sprint runners (n = 8), endurance runners (n = 8) and sedentary controls (n = 7) received a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. All participants were healthy lean males, aged 21-29 years. Besides glucose and insulin responses, a total of nine such indices were computed. Fasting as well as post-load glucose concentrations were similar in the three groups, while basal plasma insulin and the insulinaemic response to glucose were both higher in untrained individuals (at P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). There were no differences between endurance and sprint runners. The results for insulin sensitivity, however, were quite variable: three indices showed that both groups of athletes were more insulin-sensitive than controls; three indicated that this was the case for endurance runners only; one indicated that this was the case for sprint runners only; and two showed that sprint runners were more insulin-sensitive than either sedentary individuals or endurance runners (all differences were significant at P < 0.05). Controlling for total body weight or lean mass did not effectively resolve this disagreement. Apparently, the various insulin sensitivity indices examined provided different quantitative and qualitative information, despite insulin action being greater in both groups of athletes relative to controls, as reflected by their similar glucose tolerance with lower insulin concentrations. We suggest, therefore, that the use and interpretation of such indices among physically active individuals be made with caution.",
keywords = "Athletes, Endurance, Glucose tolerance, Insulin sensitivity, Oral glucose tolerance test, Sprint",
author = "Konstantinos Niakaris and Faidon Magkos and Nikos Geladas and Sidossis, {Labros S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/02640410400023241",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1065--1073",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insulin sensitivity derived from oral glucose tolerance testing in athletes

T2 - Disagreement between available indices

AU - Niakaris, Konstantinos

AU - Magkos, Faidon

AU - Geladas, Nikos

AU - Sidossis, Labros S.

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - The aims of the present study were to determine whether available "fasting" and oral glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity indices could effectively discriminate between individuals with higher than normal insulin sensitivity, and whether they would all provide similar information in clinical practice. Sprint runners (n = 8), endurance runners (n = 8) and sedentary controls (n = 7) received a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. All participants were healthy lean males, aged 21-29 years. Besides glucose and insulin responses, a total of nine such indices were computed. Fasting as well as post-load glucose concentrations were similar in the three groups, while basal plasma insulin and the insulinaemic response to glucose were both higher in untrained individuals (at P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). There were no differences between endurance and sprint runners. The results for insulin sensitivity, however, were quite variable: three indices showed that both groups of athletes were more insulin-sensitive than controls; three indicated that this was the case for endurance runners only; one indicated that this was the case for sprint runners only; and two showed that sprint runners were more insulin-sensitive than either sedentary individuals or endurance runners (all differences were significant at P < 0.05). Controlling for total body weight or lean mass did not effectively resolve this disagreement. Apparently, the various insulin sensitivity indices examined provided different quantitative and qualitative information, despite insulin action being greater in both groups of athletes relative to controls, as reflected by their similar glucose tolerance with lower insulin concentrations. We suggest, therefore, that the use and interpretation of such indices among physically active individuals be made with caution.

AB - The aims of the present study were to determine whether available "fasting" and oral glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity indices could effectively discriminate between individuals with higher than normal insulin sensitivity, and whether they would all provide similar information in clinical practice. Sprint runners (n = 8), endurance runners (n = 8) and sedentary controls (n = 7) received a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. All participants were healthy lean males, aged 21-29 years. Besides glucose and insulin responses, a total of nine such indices were computed. Fasting as well as post-load glucose concentrations were similar in the three groups, while basal plasma insulin and the insulinaemic response to glucose were both higher in untrained individuals (at P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). There were no differences between endurance and sprint runners. The results for insulin sensitivity, however, were quite variable: three indices showed that both groups of athletes were more insulin-sensitive than controls; three indicated that this was the case for endurance runners only; one indicated that this was the case for sprint runners only; and two showed that sprint runners were more insulin-sensitive than either sedentary individuals or endurance runners (all differences were significant at P < 0.05). Controlling for total body weight or lean mass did not effectively resolve this disagreement. Apparently, the various insulin sensitivity indices examined provided different quantitative and qualitative information, despite insulin action being greater in both groups of athletes relative to controls, as reflected by their similar glucose tolerance with lower insulin concentrations. We suggest, therefore, that the use and interpretation of such indices among physically active individuals be made with caution.

KW - Athletes

KW - Endurance

KW - Glucose tolerance

KW - Insulin sensitivity

KW - Oral glucose tolerance test

KW - Sprint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144490030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144490030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640410400023241

DO - 10.1080/02640410400023241

M3 - Article

C2 - 16194983

AN - SCOPUS:25144490030

VL - 23

SP - 1065

EP - 1073

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 10

ER -