Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions

M. L. Nichols, F. B. Quinn, V. J. Schnadig, P. Zaharopoulos, J. A. Hokanson, L. Des Jardins, M. M. McCracken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of brush cytology as a diagnostic tool for lesions of the head and neck. Brush specimens were obtained from patients for whom surgical biopsy was recommended by the Otolaryngology Service of the University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals, Galveston. Specimens were interpreted independently by three cytologists, and interobserver variability was calculated. If a surgical biopsy was performed, histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of each cytologic interpretation. Correspondence of cytopathologic interpretation with histologic diagnosis was sufficient to conclude that brush biopsy is a useful screening technique for unsuspected or clinically undetected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Because of its ability to sample large surface areas with minimal tissue trauma, brush biopsy can be a useful screening technique in combination with selective surgical biopsy for the detection of cytologic changes of malignant neoplasia. Brush cytology costs less than surgical biopsy, yet its relatively high sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant grades support its utility. Brush cytology, furthermore, has a low interobserver variability for the benign and malignant grades, suggesting that in the hands of an experienced cytopathologist it can be relied on with confidence. For grades 2 or 3 (inconclusive), brush cytology, however, demonstrated much higher interobserver variability. Based on the findings of this and other studies, brush cytology can be effective in identifying clinically unsuspected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, especially in patients with mucosal changes suggestive of 'field cancerization.'

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1350-1355
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume117
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Neck
Head
Cell Biology
Biopsy
Satellite Hospitals
Neoplasms
Otolaryngology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Nichols, M. L., Quinn, F. B., Schnadig, V. J., Zaharopoulos, P., Hokanson, J. A., Des Jardins, L., & McCracken, M. M. (1991). Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 117(12), 1350-1355.

Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions. / Nichols, M. L.; Quinn, F. B.; Schnadig, V. J.; Zaharopoulos, P.; Hokanson, J. A.; Des Jardins, L.; McCracken, M. M.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 117, No. 12, 1991, p. 1350-1355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nichols, ML, Quinn, FB, Schnadig, VJ, Zaharopoulos, P, Hokanson, JA, Des Jardins, L & McCracken, MM 1991, 'Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions', Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 1350-1355.
Nichols ML, Quinn FB, Schnadig VJ, Zaharopoulos P, Hokanson JA, Des Jardins L et al. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1991;117(12):1350-1355.
Nichols, M. L. ; Quinn, F. B. ; Schnadig, V. J. ; Zaharopoulos, P. ; Hokanson, J. A. ; Des Jardins, L. ; McCracken, M. M. / Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions. In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1991 ; Vol. 117, No. 12. pp. 1350-1355.
@article{d558c960b5c54bdba9534dab4a4d5f67,
title = "Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions",
abstract = "A study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of brush cytology as a diagnostic tool for lesions of the head and neck. Brush specimens were obtained from patients for whom surgical biopsy was recommended by the Otolaryngology Service of the University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals, Galveston. Specimens were interpreted independently by three cytologists, and interobserver variability was calculated. If a surgical biopsy was performed, histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of each cytologic interpretation. Correspondence of cytopathologic interpretation with histologic diagnosis was sufficient to conclude that brush biopsy is a useful screening technique for unsuspected or clinically undetected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Because of its ability to sample large surface areas with minimal tissue trauma, brush biopsy can be a useful screening technique in combination with selective surgical biopsy for the detection of cytologic changes of malignant neoplasia. Brush cytology costs less than surgical biopsy, yet its relatively high sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant grades support its utility. Brush cytology, furthermore, has a low interobserver variability for the benign and malignant grades, suggesting that in the hands of an experienced cytopathologist it can be relied on with confidence. For grades 2 or 3 (inconclusive), brush cytology, however, demonstrated much higher interobserver variability. Based on the findings of this and other studies, brush cytology can be effective in identifying clinically unsuspected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, especially in patients with mucosal changes suggestive of 'field cancerization.'",
author = "Nichols, {M. L.} and Quinn, {F. B.} and Schnadig, {V. J.} and P. Zaharopoulos and Hokanson, {J. A.} and {Des Jardins}, L. and McCracken, {M. M.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "1350--1355",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions

AU - Nichols, M. L.

AU - Quinn, F. B.

AU - Schnadig, V. J.

AU - Zaharopoulos, P.

AU - Hokanson, J. A.

AU - Des Jardins, L.

AU - McCracken, M. M.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - A study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of brush cytology as a diagnostic tool for lesions of the head and neck. Brush specimens were obtained from patients for whom surgical biopsy was recommended by the Otolaryngology Service of the University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals, Galveston. Specimens were interpreted independently by three cytologists, and interobserver variability was calculated. If a surgical biopsy was performed, histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of each cytologic interpretation. Correspondence of cytopathologic interpretation with histologic diagnosis was sufficient to conclude that brush biopsy is a useful screening technique for unsuspected or clinically undetected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Because of its ability to sample large surface areas with minimal tissue trauma, brush biopsy can be a useful screening technique in combination with selective surgical biopsy for the detection of cytologic changes of malignant neoplasia. Brush cytology costs less than surgical biopsy, yet its relatively high sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant grades support its utility. Brush cytology, furthermore, has a low interobserver variability for the benign and malignant grades, suggesting that in the hands of an experienced cytopathologist it can be relied on with confidence. For grades 2 or 3 (inconclusive), brush cytology, however, demonstrated much higher interobserver variability. Based on the findings of this and other studies, brush cytology can be effective in identifying clinically unsuspected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, especially in patients with mucosal changes suggestive of 'field cancerization.'

AB - A study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of brush cytology as a diagnostic tool for lesions of the head and neck. Brush specimens were obtained from patients for whom surgical biopsy was recommended by the Otolaryngology Service of the University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals, Galveston. Specimens were interpreted independently by three cytologists, and interobserver variability was calculated. If a surgical biopsy was performed, histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of each cytologic interpretation. Correspondence of cytopathologic interpretation with histologic diagnosis was sufficient to conclude that brush biopsy is a useful screening technique for unsuspected or clinically undetected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Because of its ability to sample large surface areas with minimal tissue trauma, brush biopsy can be a useful screening technique in combination with selective surgical biopsy for the detection of cytologic changes of malignant neoplasia. Brush cytology costs less than surgical biopsy, yet its relatively high sensitivity and specificity for both benign and malignant grades support its utility. Brush cytology, furthermore, has a low interobserver variability for the benign and malignant grades, suggesting that in the hands of an experienced cytopathologist it can be relied on with confidence. For grades 2 or 3 (inconclusive), brush cytology, however, demonstrated much higher interobserver variability. Based on the findings of this and other studies, brush cytology can be effective in identifying clinically unsuspected malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, especially in patients with mucosal changes suggestive of 'field cancerization.'

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025932487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025932487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 1350

EP - 1355

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 12

ER -