Interpreting a randomized trial report: evidence-based practice for the clinician

Alex C. Vidaeff, George Saade, Michael A. Belfort

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this article is to present a structured approach to help the reader with the objective interpretation of published randomized clinical trials. This process will promote an organized and critical appraisal of scientific evidence, which we believe to be an essential step prior to the introduction of published scientific findings into clinical practice. The reason to personally scrutinize and critically assess published reports is that the process of peer review is by no means perfect and methodological flaws can be uncovered, even in articles published in prestigious journals. The article elaborates on the substance of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statements intended to facilitate the complete reporting of trials and aid in their critical assessment. The structure of the CONSORT guidelines was used as a basis for specific commentary, including cautions for the clinical interpretation, implications and impact of published randomized trial reports.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Oct 15 2015

    Fingerprint

    Evidence-Based Practice
    Peer Review
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Guidelines

    Keywords

    • CONSORT statements
    • interpreting published reports
    • scientific evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Cite this

    Interpreting a randomized trial report : evidence-based practice for the clinician. / Vidaeff, Alex C.; Saade, George; Belfort, Michael A.

    In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 15.10.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{ab8406753c5349849141b2e735d7c45f,
    title = "Interpreting a randomized trial report: evidence-based practice for the clinician",
    abstract = "The purpose of this article is to present a structured approach to help the reader with the objective interpretation of published randomized clinical trials. This process will promote an organized and critical appraisal of scientific evidence, which we believe to be an essential step prior to the introduction of published scientific findings into clinical practice. The reason to personally scrutinize and critically assess published reports is that the process of peer review is by no means perfect and methodological flaws can be uncovered, even in articles published in prestigious journals. The article elaborates on the substance of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statements intended to facilitate the complete reporting of trials and aid in their critical assessment. The structure of the CONSORT guidelines was used as a basis for specific commentary, including cautions for the clinical interpretation, implications and impact of published randomized trial reports.",
    keywords = "CONSORT statements, interpreting published reports, scientific evidence",
    author = "Vidaeff, {Alex C.} and George Saade and Belfort, {Michael A.}",
    year = "2015",
    month = "10",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.3109/14767058.2015.1095882",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
    issn = "1476-7058",
    publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Interpreting a randomized trial report

    T2 - evidence-based practice for the clinician

    AU - Vidaeff, Alex C.

    AU - Saade, George

    AU - Belfort, Michael A.

    PY - 2015/10/15

    Y1 - 2015/10/15

    N2 - The purpose of this article is to present a structured approach to help the reader with the objective interpretation of published randomized clinical trials. This process will promote an organized and critical appraisal of scientific evidence, which we believe to be an essential step prior to the introduction of published scientific findings into clinical practice. The reason to personally scrutinize and critically assess published reports is that the process of peer review is by no means perfect and methodological flaws can be uncovered, even in articles published in prestigious journals. The article elaborates on the substance of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statements intended to facilitate the complete reporting of trials and aid in their critical assessment. The structure of the CONSORT guidelines was used as a basis for specific commentary, including cautions for the clinical interpretation, implications and impact of published randomized trial reports.

    AB - The purpose of this article is to present a structured approach to help the reader with the objective interpretation of published randomized clinical trials. This process will promote an organized and critical appraisal of scientific evidence, which we believe to be an essential step prior to the introduction of published scientific findings into clinical practice. The reason to personally scrutinize and critically assess published reports is that the process of peer review is by no means perfect and methodological flaws can be uncovered, even in articles published in prestigious journals. The article elaborates on the substance of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statements intended to facilitate the complete reporting of trials and aid in their critical assessment. The structure of the CONSORT guidelines was used as a basis for specific commentary, including cautions for the clinical interpretation, implications and impact of published randomized trial reports.

    KW - CONSORT statements

    KW - interpreting published reports

    KW - scientific evidence

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944929622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944929622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1095882

    DO - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1095882

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 26482527

    AN - SCOPUS:84944929622

    JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

    JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

    SN - 1476-7058

    ER -