Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra

Dan Levy, Christopher Reeder, Bradford Loucas, Lynn Hlatky, Allen Chen, Michael Cornforth, Rainer Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ionizing radiation can damage cells by breaking both strands of DNA in multiple locations, essentially cutting chromosomes into pieces. The cell has enzymatic mechanisms to repair such breaks; however, these mechanisms are imperfect and, in an exchange process, may produce a large-scale rearrangement of the genome, called a chromosome aberration. Chromosome aberrations are important in killing cells, during carcinogenesis, in characterizing repair/misrepair pathways, in retrospective radiation biodosimetry, and in a number of other ways. DNA staining techniques such as mFISH (multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization) provide a means for analyzing aberration spectra by examining observed final patterns. Unfortunately, an mFISH observed final pattern often does not uniquely determine the underlying exchange process. Further, resolution limitations in the painting protocol sometimes lead to apparently incomplete final patterns. We here describe an algorithm for systematically finding exchange processes consistent with any observed final pattern. This algorithm uses aberration multigraphs, a mathematical formalism that links the various aspects of aberration formation. By applying a measure to the space of consistent multigraphs, we will show how to generate model-specific distributions of aberration processes from mFISH experimental data. The approach is implemented by software freely available over the internet. As a sample application, we apply these algorithms to an aberration data set, obtaining a distribution of exchange cycle sizes, which serves to measure aberration complexity. Estimating complexity, in turn, helps indicate how damaging the aberrations are and may facilitate identification of radiation type in retrospective biodosimetry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-155
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Computational Biology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chromosomes
Aberrations
Aberration
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Chromosome Aberrations
Chromosome
Radiation
In Situ Hybridization
Paintings
DNA
Ionizing Radiation
Internet
Carcinogenesis
Software
Multigraph
Genome
Staining and Labeling
Repair
Cell
Ionizing radiation

Keywords

  • Chromosome aberrations
  • Graph theory
  • Ionizing radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra. / Levy, Dan; Reeder, Christopher; Loucas, Bradford; Hlatky, Lynn; Chen, Allen; Cornforth, Michael; Sachs, Rainer.

In: Journal of Computational Biology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 144-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levy, D, Reeder, C, Loucas, B, Hlatky, L, Chen, A, Cornforth, M & Sachs, R 2007, 'Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra', Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2006.0127
Levy, Dan ; Reeder, Christopher ; Loucas, Bradford ; Hlatky, Lynn ; Chen, Allen ; Cornforth, Michael ; Sachs, Rainer. / Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra. In: Journal of Computational Biology. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 144-155.
@article{048b9b686993438fb9a8cdafc37df148,
title = "Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra",
abstract = "Ionizing radiation can damage cells by breaking both strands of DNA in multiple locations, essentially cutting chromosomes into pieces. The cell has enzymatic mechanisms to repair such breaks; however, these mechanisms are imperfect and, in an exchange process, may produce a large-scale rearrangement of the genome, called a chromosome aberration. Chromosome aberrations are important in killing cells, during carcinogenesis, in characterizing repair/misrepair pathways, in retrospective radiation biodosimetry, and in a number of other ways. DNA staining techniques such as mFISH (multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization) provide a means for analyzing aberration spectra by examining observed final patterns. Unfortunately, an mFISH observed final pattern often does not uniquely determine the underlying exchange process. Further, resolution limitations in the painting protocol sometimes lead to apparently incomplete final patterns. We here describe an algorithm for systematically finding exchange processes consistent with any observed final pattern. This algorithm uses aberration multigraphs, a mathematical formalism that links the various aspects of aberration formation. By applying a measure to the space of consistent multigraphs, we will show how to generate model-specific distributions of aberration processes from mFISH experimental data. The approach is implemented by software freely available over the internet. As a sample application, we apply these algorithms to an aberration data set, obtaining a distribution of exchange cycle sizes, which serves to measure aberration complexity. Estimating complexity, in turn, helps indicate how damaging the aberrations are and may facilitate identification of radiation type in retrospective biodosimetry.",
keywords = "Chromosome aberrations, Graph theory, Ionizing radiation",
author = "Dan Levy and Christopher Reeder and Bradford Loucas and Lynn Hlatky and Allen Chen and Michael Cornforth and Rainer Sachs",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1089/cmb.2006.0127",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "144--155",
journal = "Journal of Computational Biology",
issn = "1066-5277",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting chromosome aberration spectra

AU - Levy, Dan

AU - Reeder, Christopher

AU - Loucas, Bradford

AU - Hlatky, Lynn

AU - Chen, Allen

AU - Cornforth, Michael

AU - Sachs, Rainer

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Ionizing radiation can damage cells by breaking both strands of DNA in multiple locations, essentially cutting chromosomes into pieces. The cell has enzymatic mechanisms to repair such breaks; however, these mechanisms are imperfect and, in an exchange process, may produce a large-scale rearrangement of the genome, called a chromosome aberration. Chromosome aberrations are important in killing cells, during carcinogenesis, in characterizing repair/misrepair pathways, in retrospective radiation biodosimetry, and in a number of other ways. DNA staining techniques such as mFISH (multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization) provide a means for analyzing aberration spectra by examining observed final patterns. Unfortunately, an mFISH observed final pattern often does not uniquely determine the underlying exchange process. Further, resolution limitations in the painting protocol sometimes lead to apparently incomplete final patterns. We here describe an algorithm for systematically finding exchange processes consistent with any observed final pattern. This algorithm uses aberration multigraphs, a mathematical formalism that links the various aspects of aberration formation. By applying a measure to the space of consistent multigraphs, we will show how to generate model-specific distributions of aberration processes from mFISH experimental data. The approach is implemented by software freely available over the internet. As a sample application, we apply these algorithms to an aberration data set, obtaining a distribution of exchange cycle sizes, which serves to measure aberration complexity. Estimating complexity, in turn, helps indicate how damaging the aberrations are and may facilitate identification of radiation type in retrospective biodosimetry.

AB - Ionizing radiation can damage cells by breaking both strands of DNA in multiple locations, essentially cutting chromosomes into pieces. The cell has enzymatic mechanisms to repair such breaks; however, these mechanisms are imperfect and, in an exchange process, may produce a large-scale rearrangement of the genome, called a chromosome aberration. Chromosome aberrations are important in killing cells, during carcinogenesis, in characterizing repair/misrepair pathways, in retrospective radiation biodosimetry, and in a number of other ways. DNA staining techniques such as mFISH (multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization) provide a means for analyzing aberration spectra by examining observed final patterns. Unfortunately, an mFISH observed final pattern often does not uniquely determine the underlying exchange process. Further, resolution limitations in the painting protocol sometimes lead to apparently incomplete final patterns. We here describe an algorithm for systematically finding exchange processes consistent with any observed final pattern. This algorithm uses aberration multigraphs, a mathematical formalism that links the various aspects of aberration formation. By applying a measure to the space of consistent multigraphs, we will show how to generate model-specific distributions of aberration processes from mFISH experimental data. The approach is implemented by software freely available over the internet. As a sample application, we apply these algorithms to an aberration data set, obtaining a distribution of exchange cycle sizes, which serves to measure aberration complexity. Estimating complexity, in turn, helps indicate how damaging the aberrations are and may facilitate identification of radiation type in retrospective biodosimetry.

KW - Chromosome aberrations

KW - Graph theory

KW - Ionizing radiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248225520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248225520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/cmb.2006.0127

DO - 10.1089/cmb.2006.0127

M3 - Article

C2 - 17456013

AN - SCOPUS:34248225520

VL - 14

SP - 144

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Computational Biology

JF - Journal of Computational Biology

SN - 1066-5277

IS - 2

ER -