Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury

R. K. Narayan, P. R S Kishore, D. P. Becker, J. D. Ward, G. G. Enas, R. P. Greenberg, A. Domingues Da Silva, M. H. Lipper, S. C. Choi, C. G. Mayhall, H. A. Lutz, H. F. Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

397 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors have analyzed their experience with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in 207 patients over a 4-year period. Patients with either high-density or low-density lesions on computerized tomography (CT) at admission had a high incidence (53% to 63%) of intracranial hypertension (ICP persistently over 20 mm Hg). In contrast, patients with normal CT scans at admission had a relatively low incidence of ICP elevation (13%). Among these patients, three features were found to be strongly associated with the development of intracranial hypertension: 1) age over 40 years; 2) systolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg; and 3) motor posturing - unilateral or bilateral. When two or more of these features were noted at admission, the incidence of intracranial hypertension was 60%, as compared to 4% when only one, or none, of these features were present. Thus, the patients at high risk for developing intracranial hypertension after severe head injury are those with abnormal CT scans at admission, and those with normal CT scans who demonstrate two or more of the above-mentioned adverse features. Based on these criteria, only 16% of this series of patients with normal CT scans should have qualified for monitoring. In addition to the three clinical features noted above, multimodality evoked potential (MEP) studies were also found to be strong predictors of ICP elevation in the normal CT scan group, with a 75% incidence of intracranial hypertension in patients with disseminated deficits. There was no statistically significant correlation between the Glasgow Coma Scale score, eye movements, pupillary reaction, hypoxia, or anemia at admission and subsequent ICP elevation in the group with normal CT scans. In this series, an intraventricular catheter was used as the sole monitoring device in 91% of the cases. In the remaining 9%, subarachnoid screws were employed, either alone, or upon failure of the ventriculostomy. While no mortality was directly ascribed to the monitoring process, there was a 7.7% complication rate (infection 6.3% + hemorrhage 1.4%). Eighty-five percent of the infections occurred in patients who had been monitored for 5 days or more, while no infections were noted in those monitored for less than 3 days. Used judiciously, this technique can be valuable in the monitoring and treatment of the brain-injured patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)650-659
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume56
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intracranial Pressure
Intracranial Hypertension
Craniocerebral Trauma
Tomography
Incidence
Infection
Ventriculostomy
Blood Pressure
Glasgow Coma Scale
Eye Movements
Evoked Potentials
Anemia
Catheters
Hemorrhage
Equipment and Supplies
Mortality
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Narayan, R. K., Kishore, P. R. S., Becker, D. P., Ward, J. D., Enas, G. G., Greenberg, R. P., ... Young, H. F. (1982). Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 56(5), 650-659.

Intracranial pressure : to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. / Narayan, R. K.; Kishore, P. R S; Becker, D. P.; Ward, J. D.; Enas, G. G.; Greenberg, R. P.; Domingues Da Silva, A.; Lipper, M. H.; Choi, S. C.; Mayhall, C. G.; Lutz, H. A.; Young, H. F.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 56, No. 5, 1982, p. 650-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Narayan, RK, Kishore, PRS, Becker, DP, Ward, JD, Enas, GG, Greenberg, RP, Domingues Da Silva, A, Lipper, MH, Choi, SC, Mayhall, CG, Lutz, HA & Young, HF 1982, 'Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury', Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 650-659.
Narayan RK, Kishore PRS, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP et al. Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1982;56(5):650-659.
Narayan, R. K. ; Kishore, P. R S ; Becker, D. P. ; Ward, J. D. ; Enas, G. G. ; Greenberg, R. P. ; Domingues Da Silva, A. ; Lipper, M. H. ; Choi, S. C. ; Mayhall, C. G. ; Lutz, H. A. ; Young, H. F. / Intracranial pressure : to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. In: Journal of Neurosurgery. 1982 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 650-659.
@article{3795d9a3dba84f3498ff5e66e46fdaec,
title = "Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury",
abstract = "The authors have analyzed their experience with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in 207 patients over a 4-year period. Patients with either high-density or low-density lesions on computerized tomography (CT) at admission had a high incidence (53{\%} to 63{\%}) of intracranial hypertension (ICP persistently over 20 mm Hg). In contrast, patients with normal CT scans at admission had a relatively low incidence of ICP elevation (13{\%}). Among these patients, three features were found to be strongly associated with the development of intracranial hypertension: 1) age over 40 years; 2) systolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg; and 3) motor posturing - unilateral or bilateral. When two or more of these features were noted at admission, the incidence of intracranial hypertension was 60{\%}, as compared to 4{\%} when only one, or none, of these features were present. Thus, the patients at high risk for developing intracranial hypertension after severe head injury are those with abnormal CT scans at admission, and those with normal CT scans who demonstrate two or more of the above-mentioned adverse features. Based on these criteria, only 16{\%} of this series of patients with normal CT scans should have qualified for monitoring. In addition to the three clinical features noted above, multimodality evoked potential (MEP) studies were also found to be strong predictors of ICP elevation in the normal CT scan group, with a 75{\%} incidence of intracranial hypertension in patients with disseminated deficits. There was no statistically significant correlation between the Glasgow Coma Scale score, eye movements, pupillary reaction, hypoxia, or anemia at admission and subsequent ICP elevation in the group with normal CT scans. In this series, an intraventricular catheter was used as the sole monitoring device in 91{\%} of the cases. In the remaining 9{\%}, subarachnoid screws were employed, either alone, or upon failure of the ventriculostomy. While no mortality was directly ascribed to the monitoring process, there was a 7.7{\%} complication rate (infection 6.3{\%} + hemorrhage 1.4{\%}). Eighty-five percent of the infections occurred in patients who had been monitored for 5 days or more, while no infections were noted in those monitored for less than 3 days. Used judiciously, this technique can be valuable in the monitoring and treatment of the brain-injured patient.",
author = "Narayan, {R. K.} and Kishore, {P. R S} and Becker, {D. P.} and Ward, {J. D.} and Enas, {G. G.} and Greenberg, {R. P.} and {Domingues Da Silva}, A. and Lipper, {M. H.} and Choi, {S. C.} and Mayhall, {C. G.} and Lutz, {H. A.} and Young, {H. F.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "650--659",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intracranial pressure

T2 - to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury

AU - Narayan, R. K.

AU - Kishore, P. R S

AU - Becker, D. P.

AU - Ward, J. D.

AU - Enas, G. G.

AU - Greenberg, R. P.

AU - Domingues Da Silva, A.

AU - Lipper, M. H.

AU - Choi, S. C.

AU - Mayhall, C. G.

AU - Lutz, H. A.

AU - Young, H. F.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - The authors have analyzed their experience with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in 207 patients over a 4-year period. Patients with either high-density or low-density lesions on computerized tomography (CT) at admission had a high incidence (53% to 63%) of intracranial hypertension (ICP persistently over 20 mm Hg). In contrast, patients with normal CT scans at admission had a relatively low incidence of ICP elevation (13%). Among these patients, three features were found to be strongly associated with the development of intracranial hypertension: 1) age over 40 years; 2) systolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg; and 3) motor posturing - unilateral or bilateral. When two or more of these features were noted at admission, the incidence of intracranial hypertension was 60%, as compared to 4% when only one, or none, of these features were present. Thus, the patients at high risk for developing intracranial hypertension after severe head injury are those with abnormal CT scans at admission, and those with normal CT scans who demonstrate two or more of the above-mentioned adverse features. Based on these criteria, only 16% of this series of patients with normal CT scans should have qualified for monitoring. In addition to the three clinical features noted above, multimodality evoked potential (MEP) studies were also found to be strong predictors of ICP elevation in the normal CT scan group, with a 75% incidence of intracranial hypertension in patients with disseminated deficits. There was no statistically significant correlation between the Glasgow Coma Scale score, eye movements, pupillary reaction, hypoxia, or anemia at admission and subsequent ICP elevation in the group with normal CT scans. In this series, an intraventricular catheter was used as the sole monitoring device in 91% of the cases. In the remaining 9%, subarachnoid screws were employed, either alone, or upon failure of the ventriculostomy. While no mortality was directly ascribed to the monitoring process, there was a 7.7% complication rate (infection 6.3% + hemorrhage 1.4%). Eighty-five percent of the infections occurred in patients who had been monitored for 5 days or more, while no infections were noted in those monitored for less than 3 days. Used judiciously, this technique can be valuable in the monitoring and treatment of the brain-injured patient.

AB - The authors have analyzed their experience with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in 207 patients over a 4-year period. Patients with either high-density or low-density lesions on computerized tomography (CT) at admission had a high incidence (53% to 63%) of intracranial hypertension (ICP persistently over 20 mm Hg). In contrast, patients with normal CT scans at admission had a relatively low incidence of ICP elevation (13%). Among these patients, three features were found to be strongly associated with the development of intracranial hypertension: 1) age over 40 years; 2) systolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg; and 3) motor posturing - unilateral or bilateral. When two or more of these features were noted at admission, the incidence of intracranial hypertension was 60%, as compared to 4% when only one, or none, of these features were present. Thus, the patients at high risk for developing intracranial hypertension after severe head injury are those with abnormal CT scans at admission, and those with normal CT scans who demonstrate two or more of the above-mentioned adverse features. Based on these criteria, only 16% of this series of patients with normal CT scans should have qualified for monitoring. In addition to the three clinical features noted above, multimodality evoked potential (MEP) studies were also found to be strong predictors of ICP elevation in the normal CT scan group, with a 75% incidence of intracranial hypertension in patients with disseminated deficits. There was no statistically significant correlation between the Glasgow Coma Scale score, eye movements, pupillary reaction, hypoxia, or anemia at admission and subsequent ICP elevation in the group with normal CT scans. In this series, an intraventricular catheter was used as the sole monitoring device in 91% of the cases. In the remaining 9%, subarachnoid screws were employed, either alone, or upon failure of the ventriculostomy. While no mortality was directly ascribed to the monitoring process, there was a 7.7% complication rate (infection 6.3% + hemorrhage 1.4%). Eighty-five percent of the infections occurred in patients who had been monitored for 5 days or more, while no infections were noted in those monitored for less than 3 days. Used judiciously, this technique can be valuable in the monitoring and treatment of the brain-injured patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019997563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019997563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7069477

AN - SCOPUS:0019997563

VL - 56

SP - 650

EP - 659

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 5

ER -