Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses

Peter A. Cataldo, Anthony Senagore, Martin A. Luchtefeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experience with intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) is limited for the evaluation of perianal sepsis. The purpose of this article is to report our experience with IRUS in evaluating 24 cases of suspected perianal abscess and fistula. IRUS was performed intraoperatively using a Brüel & Kjaer (Model #1846; Naerum, Denmark) endoanal ultrasound scanner with a 7-MHz transducer. After completion of the IRUS, careful anorectal examination and appropriate surgical therapy were performed. At surgery, 19/24 patients were found to have perirectal abscesses, with all 19 cases correctly identified preoperatively by IRUS. In 12 cases (63 percent), IRUS correctly defined the relationship between the abscesses and sphincters by Parks' classification. At surgery, internal openings of fistulous tracts were found in 14/19 cases, but IRUS identified only 4/14 (28 percent). In 6/24 cases, IRUS and clinical evaluation did not demonstrate a perirectal abscess. The role of IRUS in the evaluation of perirectal abscess is evolving. Certainly, uncomplicated abscesses can be managed without ultrasonography. However, IRUS can be an adjunct to careful evaluation of complex perianal suppurative disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-558
Number of pages5
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abscess
Ultrasonography
Denmark
Transducers
Fistula
Sepsis

Keywords

  • Intrarectal ultrasound
  • Perirectal abscess

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses. / Cataldo, Peter A.; Senagore, Anthony; Luchtefeld, Martin A.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 36, No. 6, 06.1993, p. 554-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cataldo, Peter A. ; Senagore, Anthony ; Luchtefeld, Martin A. / Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1993 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 554-558.
@article{80c4a1632b194a46bf2650006cd7a6df,
title = "Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses",
abstract = "Experience with intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) is limited for the evaluation of perianal sepsis. The purpose of this article is to report our experience with IRUS in evaluating 24 cases of suspected perianal abscess and fistula. IRUS was performed intraoperatively using a Br{\"u}el & Kjaer (Model #1846; Naerum, Denmark) endoanal ultrasound scanner with a 7-MHz transducer. After completion of the IRUS, careful anorectal examination and appropriate surgical therapy were performed. At surgery, 19/24 patients were found to have perirectal abscesses, with all 19 cases correctly identified preoperatively by IRUS. In 12 cases (63 percent), IRUS correctly defined the relationship between the abscesses and sphincters by Parks' classification. At surgery, internal openings of fistulous tracts were found in 14/19 cases, but IRUS identified only 4/14 (28 percent). In 6/24 cases, IRUS and clinical evaluation did not demonstrate a perirectal abscess. The role of IRUS in the evaluation of perirectal abscess is evolving. Certainly, uncomplicated abscesses can be managed without ultrasonography. However, IRUS can be an adjunct to careful evaluation of complex perianal suppurative disease.",
keywords = "Intrarectal ultrasound, Perirectal abscess",
author = "Cataldo, {Peter A.} and Anthony Senagore and Luchtefeld, {Martin A.}",
year = "1993",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF02049861",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "554--558",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrarectal ultrasound in the evaluation of perirectal abscesses

AU - Cataldo, Peter A.

AU - Senagore, Anthony

AU - Luchtefeld, Martin A.

PY - 1993/6

Y1 - 1993/6

N2 - Experience with intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) is limited for the evaluation of perianal sepsis. The purpose of this article is to report our experience with IRUS in evaluating 24 cases of suspected perianal abscess and fistula. IRUS was performed intraoperatively using a Brüel & Kjaer (Model #1846; Naerum, Denmark) endoanal ultrasound scanner with a 7-MHz transducer. After completion of the IRUS, careful anorectal examination and appropriate surgical therapy were performed. At surgery, 19/24 patients were found to have perirectal abscesses, with all 19 cases correctly identified preoperatively by IRUS. In 12 cases (63 percent), IRUS correctly defined the relationship between the abscesses and sphincters by Parks' classification. At surgery, internal openings of fistulous tracts were found in 14/19 cases, but IRUS identified only 4/14 (28 percent). In 6/24 cases, IRUS and clinical evaluation did not demonstrate a perirectal abscess. The role of IRUS in the evaluation of perirectal abscess is evolving. Certainly, uncomplicated abscesses can be managed without ultrasonography. However, IRUS can be an adjunct to careful evaluation of complex perianal suppurative disease.

AB - Experience with intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) is limited for the evaluation of perianal sepsis. The purpose of this article is to report our experience with IRUS in evaluating 24 cases of suspected perianal abscess and fistula. IRUS was performed intraoperatively using a Brüel & Kjaer (Model #1846; Naerum, Denmark) endoanal ultrasound scanner with a 7-MHz transducer. After completion of the IRUS, careful anorectal examination and appropriate surgical therapy were performed. At surgery, 19/24 patients were found to have perirectal abscesses, with all 19 cases correctly identified preoperatively by IRUS. In 12 cases (63 percent), IRUS correctly defined the relationship between the abscesses and sphincters by Parks' classification. At surgery, internal openings of fistulous tracts were found in 14/19 cases, but IRUS identified only 4/14 (28 percent). In 6/24 cases, IRUS and clinical evaluation did not demonstrate a perirectal abscess. The role of IRUS in the evaluation of perirectal abscess is evolving. Certainly, uncomplicated abscesses can be managed without ultrasonography. However, IRUS can be an adjunct to careful evaluation of complex perianal suppurative disease.

KW - Intrarectal ultrasound

KW - Perirectal abscess

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027173052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027173052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02049861

DO - 10.1007/BF02049861

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 554

EP - 558

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 6

ER -