Abstract
Background: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a novel intrasaccular flow disruptor tailored for bifurcation aneurysms. We aim to describe the degree of aneurysm occlusion at the latest follow-up, and the rate of complications of aneurysms treated with the WEB device stratified according to rupture status. Methods: Our data were taken from the WorldWideWeb Consortium, an international multicenter cohort including patients treated with the WEB device. Aneurysms were classified into two groups: ruptured and unruptured. We compared clinical and radiologic outcomes of both groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match according to age, gender, bifurcation, location, prior treatment, neck, height, dome width, daughter sac, incorporated branch, pretreatment antiplatelets, and last imaging follow-up. Results: The study included 676 patients with 691 intracranial aneurysms (529 unruptured and 162 ruptured) treated with the WEB device. The PSM analysis had 55 pairs. In both the unmatched (85.8% vs 84.3%, p=0.692) and matched (94.4% vs 83.3%, p=0.066) cohorts there was no significant difference in the adequate occlusion rate at the last follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences in both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the two groups. There was no documented aneurysm rebleeding after WEB device implantation. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in both the radiologic outcomes and complications between unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. Our findings support the feasibility of treatment of ruptured aneurysms with the WEB device.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | neurintsurg-2022-019153 |
Journal | Journal of neurointerventional surgery |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Aneurysm
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Clinical Neurology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Intrasaccular flow disruption for ruptured aneurysms: An international multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrasaccular flow disruption for ruptured aneurysms
T2 - An international multicenter study
AU - Diestro, Jose Danilo Bengzon
AU - Dibas, Mahmoud
AU - Adeeb, Nimer
AU - Regenhardt, Robert W.
AU - Vranic, Justin E.
AU - Guenego, Adrien
AU - Lay, Sovann V.
AU - Renieri, Leonardo
AU - Al Balushi, Ali
AU - Shotar, Eimad
AU - Premat, Kevin
AU - El Naamani, Kareem
AU - Saliou, Guillaume
AU - Möhlenbruch, Markus A.
AU - Lylyk, Ivan
AU - Foreman, Paul M.
AU - Vachhani, Jay A.
AU - Zupančić, Vedran
AU - Hafeez, Muhammad U.
AU - Rutledge, Caleb
AU - Rai, Hamid
AU - Tutino, Vincent M.
AU - Mirshani, Shervin
AU - Ghozy, Sherief
AU - Harker, Pablo
AU - Alotaibi, Naif M.
AU - Rabinov, James D.
AU - Ren, Yifan
AU - Schirmer, Clemens M.
AU - Goren, Oded
AU - Piano, Mariangela
AU - Kuhn, Anna Luisa
AU - Michelozzi, Caterina
AU - Elens, Stephanie
AU - Starke, Robert M.
AU - Hassan, Ameer
AU - Salehani, Arsalaan
AU - Nguyen, Anh
AU - Jones, Jesse
AU - Psychogios, Marios
AU - Spears, Julian
AU - Parra-Fariñas, Carmen
AU - Bres Bullrich, Maria
AU - Mayich, Michael
AU - Salem, Mohamed M.
AU - Burkhardt, Jan Karl
AU - Jankowitz, Brian T.
AU - Domingo, Ricardo A.
AU - Huynh, Thien
AU - Tawk, Rabih
AU - Ulfert, Christian
AU - Lubicz, Boris
AU - Panni, Pietro
AU - Puri, Ajit S.
AU - Pero, Guglielmo
AU - Griessenauer, Christoph J.
AU - Asadi, Hamed
AU - Siddiqui, Adnan
AU - Ducruet, Andrew F.
AU - Albuquerque, Felipe C.
AU - Du, Rose
AU - Kan, Peter
AU - Kalousek, Vladimir
AU - Lylyk, Pedro
AU - Boddu, Srikanth Reddy
AU - Stapleton, Christopher J.
AU - Knopman, Jared
AU - Jabbour, Pascal
AU - Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula
AU - Clarençon, Frédéric
AU - Limbucci, Nicola
AU - Aziz-Sultan, Mohammad A.
AU - Cuellar-Saenz, Hugo H.
AU - Cognard, Christophe
AU - Patel, Aman B.
AU - Dmytriw, Adam A.
N1 - Funding Information: JDBD: Honoraria from Medtronic. Travel grant from Microvention. MD: No relevant relationships NA: No relevant relationships RWR: Grants from National Institutes of Health, Heitman foundation, Society of vascular and interventional neurology; Advisory board participation for Rapid medical; Site PI for Microvention and Penumbra JEV: No relevant relationships AG : No relevant relationships SVL: No relevant relationships LR: No relevant relationships AAB: No relevant relationships ES: No relevant relationships KP: No relevant relationships KEL: No relevant relationships GS : No relevant relationships MAM: No relevant relationships IL: No relevant relationships PMR: No relevant relationships JAV: Fees from MicroVention for proctoring cases for new physician users of the Woven EndoBridge device; Medtronic travel expense VŽ: Participation on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for KBC Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb / OB Nova Gradiška MUH: No relevant relationships CR: No relevant relationships HR: No relevant relationships VMT: No relevant relationships SM: No relevant relationships SG: No relevant relationships PH: No relevant relationships NA: No relevant relationships JDR: No relevant relationships YR: No relevant relationships CMS: No relevant relationships OG: No relevant relationships MP: No relevant relationships ALK: No relevant relationships CM: No relevant relationships SE: No relevant relationships RMS: Supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (R01NS111119-01A1, UL1TR002736, and KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. AH: Consulting or speaker fees from Medtronic, MicroVention, Stryker, Penumbra, Cerenovus, Genentech, GE Healthcare, Scientia, Balt, Viz.ai, Insera Therapeutics, Proximie, NeuroVasc, NovaSignal, Vesalio, and Galaxy Therapeutics. AS: No relevant relationships AN: No relevant relationships JJ: Consulting and speaker fees from Cerenovus MP: No relevant relationships JS: No relevant relationships CPF: No relevant relationships MBB: No relevant relationships MM: Grants from Balt, Medtronic, MicroVention, and Stryker. MMS: No relevant relationships JB: No relevant relationships BTJ: No relevant relationships RAD: No relevant relationships TH: No relevant relationships RT: Medtronic Stocks CU: No relevant relationships BL : No relevant relationships PP: No relevant relationships ASP: Grants from NIH, Microvention, Cerenovus, Medtronic and Stryker; Consulting fees from Neurovascular, Stryker NeurovascularBalt, Q’Apel Medical, Cerenovus, Microvention, Imperative Care, Agile, Merit, CereVasc and Arsenal Medical; stock options from InNeuroCo, Agile, Perfuze, Galaxy and NTI GP: No relevant relationships CJG: Grants to institution from Medtronic and Penumbra; consulting fees from Stryker and MicroVention. HA: Proctoring fees from MicroVention. Grants to institution from the National Institutes of Health; consulting fees from Amnis Therapeutics, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems, Cardinal Health 200, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Cerenovus, Cerevatech Medical, Cordis, Corindus, EndoStream Medical, Imperative Care, Integra, IRRAS, Medtronic, MicroVention, Minnetronix Neuro, Penumbra, Q’Apel Medical, Rapid Medical, Serenity Medical, Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Stryker Neurovascular, Three Rivers Medical, VasSol, Viz.ai, and W.L. Gore & Associates; payment for participation on the steering committees for the Cerenovus EXCELLENT and ARISE II Trial; Medtronic SWIFT PRIME, VANTAGE, EMBOLISE, and SWIFT DIRECT Trials; MicroVention FRED Trial and CONFIDENCE Study; MUSC POSITIVE Trial; Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial, MIVI Neuroscience EVAQ Trial; Rapid Medical SUCCESS Trial; InspireMD C-GUARDIANS IDE Pivotal Trial; stock or stock options in Adona Medical, Amnis Therapeutics, Bend IT Technologies, BlinkTBI, Buffalo Technology Partners, Cardinal Consultants, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Cerevatech Medical, Cognition Medical, CVAID, E8, EndoStream Medical, Imperative Care, Instylla, International Medical Distribution Partners, Launch NY, NeuroRadial Technologies, Neurotechnology Investors, Neurovascular Diagnostics, Perflow Medical, Q’Apel Medical, QAS.ai, Radical Catheter Technologies, Rebound Therapeutics (purchased in 2019 by Integra Lifesciences), Rist Neurovascular (purchased in 2020 by Medtronic), Sense Diagnostics, Serenity Medical, Silk Road Medical, Songbird Therapy, Spinnaker Medical, StimMed, Synchron, Three Rivers Medical, Truvic Medical, Tulavi Therapeutics, Vastrax, VICIS, and Viseon AFD: Consulting fees from Cerenovus, Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Oculus, and Koswire. No relevant relationships RD: No relevant relationships PK: No relevant relationships. VK: No relevant relationships. PL: No relevant relationships SB: No relevant relationships CJS: Participation on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Zoll Circulation JK: No relevant relationships PJ: No relevant relationships ST: No relevant relationships FC: No relevant relationships NL: Honoraria for lectures from Cerenovus, Stryker, and CrossMed. MAA: Funding to institution from MicroVention for WEBIT trial; proctoring fees from MicroVention. HHC: No relevant relationships CC: Consulting fees from MicroVention, Stryker, Medtronic, MIVI, and Cerenovus. ABP: Grant to institution from Medtronic; consulting fees from MicroVention, Medtronic, and Q’Apel; workstation for research from Siemens AAD: No relevant relationships Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a novel intrasaccular flow disruptor tailored for bifurcation aneurysms. We aim to describe the degree of aneurysm occlusion at the latest follow-up, and the rate of complications of aneurysms treated with the WEB device stratified according to rupture status. Methods: Our data were taken from the WorldWideWeb Consortium, an international multicenter cohort including patients treated with the WEB device. Aneurysms were classified into two groups: ruptured and unruptured. We compared clinical and radiologic outcomes of both groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match according to age, gender, bifurcation, location, prior treatment, neck, height, dome width, daughter sac, incorporated branch, pretreatment antiplatelets, and last imaging follow-up. Results: The study included 676 patients with 691 intracranial aneurysms (529 unruptured and 162 ruptured) treated with the WEB device. The PSM analysis had 55 pairs. In both the unmatched (85.8% vs 84.3%, p=0.692) and matched (94.4% vs 83.3%, p=0.066) cohorts there was no significant difference in the adequate occlusion rate at the last follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences in both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the two groups. There was no documented aneurysm rebleeding after WEB device implantation. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in both the radiologic outcomes and complications between unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. Our findings support the feasibility of treatment of ruptured aneurysms with the WEB device.
AB - Background: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a novel intrasaccular flow disruptor tailored for bifurcation aneurysms. We aim to describe the degree of aneurysm occlusion at the latest follow-up, and the rate of complications of aneurysms treated with the WEB device stratified according to rupture status. Methods: Our data were taken from the WorldWideWeb Consortium, an international multicenter cohort including patients treated with the WEB device. Aneurysms were classified into two groups: ruptured and unruptured. We compared clinical and radiologic outcomes of both groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match according to age, gender, bifurcation, location, prior treatment, neck, height, dome width, daughter sac, incorporated branch, pretreatment antiplatelets, and last imaging follow-up. Results: The study included 676 patients with 691 intracranial aneurysms (529 unruptured and 162 ruptured) treated with the WEB device. The PSM analysis had 55 pairs. In both the unmatched (85.8% vs 84.3%, p=0.692) and matched (94.4% vs 83.3%, p=0.066) cohorts there was no significant difference in the adequate occlusion rate at the last follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences in both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the two groups. There was no documented aneurysm rebleeding after WEB device implantation. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in both the radiologic outcomes and complications between unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. Our findings support the feasibility of treatment of ruptured aneurysms with the WEB device.
KW - Aneurysm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135199475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135199475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnis-2022-019153
DO - 10.1136/jnis-2022-019153
M3 - Article
C2 - 35868856
AN - SCOPUS:85135199475
SN - 1759-8478
JO - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
JF - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
M1 - neurintsurg-2022-019153
ER -