Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Results from Big Data Analysis

Chayakrit Krittanawong, Song Peng Ang, Neil Sagar Maitra, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Hani Jneid, Samin Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) can be managed by ischemia guide strategies or early invasive strategies. Here, we present the findings of an updated contemporary analysis regarding the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI)-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI and in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI in the United States using the NIS database from 2016 to 2021. ICI use increased by nearly threefold between 2016 and 2021, without a significant difference in in-hospital mortality, though interestingly, mortality rates compared with angiography guidance were similar and relatively low. In this study, the use of ICI was associated with lower adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest, but with a longer length of stay and cost of hospitalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number161
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • IVUS
  • NSTEMI
  • OCT
  • PCI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Results from Big Data Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this