Introduction

priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care

Albert Weale, Katharina Kieslich, Peter Littlejohns, Aviva Tugendhaft, Emma Tumilty, Krisantha Weerasuriya, Jennifer A. Whitty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue on improving equitable access to health care through increased public and patient involvement (PPI) in prioritization decisions by discussing the conceptualization, scope and rationales of PPI in priority setting that inform the special issue. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a mixed-methods approach in that it provides a literature review and a conceptual discussion of the common themes emerging in the field of PPI and health priority setting. Findings – The special issue focuses on public participation that is collective in character, in the sense that the participation relates to a social, not personal, decision and is relevant to whole groups of people and not single individuals. It is aimed at influencing a decision on public policy or legal rules. The rationales for public participation can be found in democratic theory, especially as they relate to the social and political values of legitimacy and representation. Originality/value – The paper builds on previous definitions of public participation by underlining its collective character. In doing so, it develops the work by Parry, Moyser and Day by arguing that, in light of the empirical evidence presented in this issue, public participatory activities such as protests and demonstrations should no longer be labelled unconventional, but should instead be labelled as “contestatory participation”. This is to better reflect a situation in which these modes of participation have become more conventional in many parts of the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-750
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Health, Organisation and Management
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Delivery of Health Care
Illegitimacy
Health Priorities
Health Services Accessibility
Public Policy
Community Participation
Public involvement
Priority setting
Public participation
Participation
Healthcare
Rationale

Keywords

  • Contestatory participation
  • Deliberation
  • Democratic theory
  • Priority setting
  • Public participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Weale, A., Kieslich, K., Littlejohns, P., Tugendhaft, A., Tumilty, E., Weerasuriya, K., & Whitty, J. A. (2016). Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 30(5), 736-750. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0036

Introduction : priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care. / Weale, Albert; Kieslich, Katharina; Littlejohns, Peter; Tugendhaft, Aviva; Tumilty, Emma; Weerasuriya, Krisantha; Whitty, Jennifer A.

In: Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, 15.08.2016, p. 736-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Weale, A, Kieslich, K, Littlejohns, P, Tugendhaft, A, Tumilty, E, Weerasuriya, K & Whitty, JA 2016, 'Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care', Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 736-750. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0036
Weale, Albert ; Kieslich, Katharina ; Littlejohns, Peter ; Tugendhaft, Aviva ; Tumilty, Emma ; Weerasuriya, Krisantha ; Whitty, Jennifer A. / Introduction : priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care. In: Journal of Health, Organisation and Management. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 736-750.
@article{2ac753ff14094719bf66bffa028133dd,
title = "Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue on improving equitable access to health care through increased public and patient involvement (PPI) in prioritization decisions by discussing the conceptualization, scope and rationales of PPI in priority setting that inform the special issue. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a mixed-methods approach in that it provides a literature review and a conceptual discussion of the common themes emerging in the field of PPI and health priority setting. Findings – The special issue focuses on public participation that is collective in character, in the sense that the participation relates to a social, not personal, decision and is relevant to whole groups of people and not single individuals. It is aimed at influencing a decision on public policy or legal rules. The rationales for public participation can be found in democratic theory, especially as they relate to the social and political values of legitimacy and representation. Originality/value – The paper builds on previous definitions of public participation by underlining its collective character. In doing so, it develops the work by Parry, Moyser and Day by arguing that, in light of the empirical evidence presented in this issue, public participatory activities such as protests and demonstrations should no longer be labelled unconventional, but should instead be labelled as “contestatory participation”. This is to better reflect a situation in which these modes of participation have become more conventional in many parts of the world.",
keywords = "Contestatory participation, Deliberation, Democratic theory, Priority setting, Public participation",
author = "Albert Weale and Katharina Kieslich and Peter Littlejohns and Aviva Tugendhaft and Emma Tumilty and Krisantha Weerasuriya and Whitty, {Jennifer A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "736--750",
journal = "Journal of Health Organization and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

T2 - priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care

AU - Weale, Albert

AU - Kieslich, Katharina

AU - Littlejohns, Peter

AU - Tugendhaft, Aviva

AU - Tumilty, Emma

AU - Weerasuriya, Krisantha

AU - Whitty, Jennifer A.

PY - 2016/8/15

Y1 - 2016/8/15

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue on improving equitable access to health care through increased public and patient involvement (PPI) in prioritization decisions by discussing the conceptualization, scope and rationales of PPI in priority setting that inform the special issue. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a mixed-methods approach in that it provides a literature review and a conceptual discussion of the common themes emerging in the field of PPI and health priority setting. Findings – The special issue focuses on public participation that is collective in character, in the sense that the participation relates to a social, not personal, decision and is relevant to whole groups of people and not single individuals. It is aimed at influencing a decision on public policy or legal rules. The rationales for public participation can be found in democratic theory, especially as they relate to the social and political values of legitimacy and representation. Originality/value – The paper builds on previous definitions of public participation by underlining its collective character. In doing so, it develops the work by Parry, Moyser and Day by arguing that, in light of the empirical evidence presented in this issue, public participatory activities such as protests and demonstrations should no longer be labelled unconventional, but should instead be labelled as “contestatory participation”. This is to better reflect a situation in which these modes of participation have become more conventional in many parts of the world.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue on improving equitable access to health care through increased public and patient involvement (PPI) in prioritization decisions by discussing the conceptualization, scope and rationales of PPI in priority setting that inform the special issue. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a mixed-methods approach in that it provides a literature review and a conceptual discussion of the common themes emerging in the field of PPI and health priority setting. Findings – The special issue focuses on public participation that is collective in character, in the sense that the participation relates to a social, not personal, decision and is relevant to whole groups of people and not single individuals. It is aimed at influencing a decision on public policy or legal rules. The rationales for public participation can be found in democratic theory, especially as they relate to the social and political values of legitimacy and representation. Originality/value – The paper builds on previous definitions of public participation by underlining its collective character. In doing so, it develops the work by Parry, Moyser and Day by arguing that, in light of the empirical evidence presented in this issue, public participatory activities such as protests and demonstrations should no longer be labelled unconventional, but should instead be labelled as “contestatory participation”. This is to better reflect a situation in which these modes of participation have become more conventional in many parts of the world.

KW - Contestatory participation

KW - Deliberation

KW - Democratic theory

KW - Priority setting

KW - Public participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979921897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979921897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0036

DO - 10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0036

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 736

EP - 750

JO - Journal of Health Organization and Management

JF - Journal of Health Organization and Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 5

ER -