Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?

Aimee K. Gardner, Daniel J. Scott, Ross E. Willis, Kent van Sickle, Michael S. Truitt, John Uecker, Kimberly M. Brown, Jeffrey M. Marks, Brian J. Dunkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination. Methods: Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded. Results: Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 %, with 68 % of residents and 85 % of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 % for manual skills and 85.7 % for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p <0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions. Discussion: These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 10 2016

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
Internship and Residency
ROC Curve

Keywords

  • Education
  • Endoscopy
  • Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery
  • Residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Gardner, A. K., Scott, D. J., Willis, R. E., van Sickle, K., Truitt, M. S., Uecker, J., ... Dunkin, B. J. (Accepted/In press). Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6

Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? / Gardner, Aimee K.; Scott, Daniel J.; Willis, Ross E.; van Sickle, Kent; Truitt, Michael S.; Uecker, John; Brown, Kimberly M.; Marks, Jeffrey M.; Dunkin, Brian J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 10.06.2016, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, AK, Scott, DJ, Willis, RE, van Sickle, K, Truitt, MS, Uecker, J, Brown, KM, Marks, JM & Dunkin, BJ 2016, 'Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?', Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6
Gardner, Aimee K. ; Scott, Daniel J. ; Willis, Ross E. ; van Sickle, Kent ; Truitt, Michael S. ; Uecker, John ; Brown, Kimberly M. ; Marks, Jeffrey M. ; Dunkin, Brian J. / Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2016 ; pp. 1-7.
@article{7817af04f0a94d5990912d821cbbc54a,
title = "Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination. Methods: Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded. Results: Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 {\%}, with 68 {\%} of residents and 85 {\%} of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 {\%} for manual skills and 85.7 {\%} for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p <0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions. Discussion: These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.",
keywords = "Education, Endoscopy, Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery, Residents",
author = "Gardner, {Aimee K.} and Scott, {Daniel J.} and Willis, {Ross E.} and {van Sickle}, Kent and Truitt, {Michael S.} and John Uecker and Brown, {Kimberly M.} and Marks, {Jeffrey M.} and Dunkin, {Brian J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?

AU - Gardner, Aimee K.

AU - Scott, Daniel J.

AU - Willis, Ross E.

AU - van Sickle, Kent

AU - Truitt, Michael S.

AU - Uecker, John

AU - Brown, Kimberly M.

AU - Marks, Jeffrey M.

AU - Dunkin, Brian J.

PY - 2016/6/10

Y1 - 2016/6/10

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination. Methods: Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded. Results: Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 %, with 68 % of residents and 85 % of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 % for manual skills and 85.7 % for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p <0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions. Discussion: These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination. Methods: Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded. Results: Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 %, with 68 % of residents and 85 % of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 % for manual skills and 85.7 % for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p <0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions. Discussion: These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.

KW - Education

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery

KW - Residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973661034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973661034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6

DO - 10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 27287896

AN - SCOPUS:84973661034

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

ER -