Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years?

Leonard E. Swischuk, Susan D. John, Eric P. Hendrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Questionnaires (984) were submitted to pediatric radiologists to determine how often odontoid fractures were missed on lateral views and detected on open-mouth odontoid views in children under 5 years. Other questions relating to imaging protocols of the odontoid also were included, and there were 432 respondents. Results. Of these, 161 respondents indicated that an open-mouth odontoid view was not routinely included in their imaging protocol. Conclusions. There was considerable variability on how the problem of imaging of the odontoid was addressed, but overall there were enough data to begin to consider the concept that the open-mouth odontoid might not be needed in patients under 5 years of age if a lateral view is normal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-189
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Radiology
Volume30
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

Mouth
Pediatrics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Swischuk, L. E., John, S. D., & Hendrick, E. P. (2000). Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years? Pediatric Radiology, 30(3), 186-189.

Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years? / Swischuk, Leonard E.; John, Susan D.; Hendrick, Eric P.

In: Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 03.2000, p. 186-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swischuk, LE, John, SD & Hendrick, EP 2000, 'Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years?', Pediatric Radiology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 186-189.
Swischuk LE, John SD, Hendrick EP. Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years? Pediatric Radiology. 2000 Mar;30(3):186-189.
Swischuk, Leonard E. ; John, Susan D. ; Hendrick, Eric P. / Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years?. In: Pediatric Radiology. 2000 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 186-189.
@article{ce4095d8c8404f0c9189021f9a1f0609,
title = "Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years?",
abstract = "Objectives. Questionnaires (984) were submitted to pediatric radiologists to determine how often odontoid fractures were missed on lateral views and detected on open-mouth odontoid views in children under 5 years. Other questions relating to imaging protocols of the odontoid also were included, and there were 432 respondents. Results. Of these, 161 respondents indicated that an open-mouth odontoid view was not routinely included in their imaging protocol. Conclusions. There was considerable variability on how the problem of imaging of the odontoid was addressed, but overall there were enough data to begin to consider the concept that the open-mouth odontoid might not be needed in patients under 5 years of age if a lateral view is normal.",
author = "Swischuk, {Leonard E.} and John, {Susan D.} and Hendrick, {Eric P.}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "186--189",
journal = "Pediatric Radiology",
issn = "0301-0449",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years?

AU - Swischuk, Leonard E.

AU - John, Susan D.

AU - Hendrick, Eric P.

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Objectives. Questionnaires (984) were submitted to pediatric radiologists to determine how often odontoid fractures were missed on lateral views and detected on open-mouth odontoid views in children under 5 years. Other questions relating to imaging protocols of the odontoid also were included, and there were 432 respondents. Results. Of these, 161 respondents indicated that an open-mouth odontoid view was not routinely included in their imaging protocol. Conclusions. There was considerable variability on how the problem of imaging of the odontoid was addressed, but overall there were enough data to begin to consider the concept that the open-mouth odontoid might not be needed in patients under 5 years of age if a lateral view is normal.

AB - Objectives. Questionnaires (984) were submitted to pediatric radiologists to determine how often odontoid fractures were missed on lateral views and detected on open-mouth odontoid views in children under 5 years. Other questions relating to imaging protocols of the odontoid also were included, and there were 432 respondents. Results. Of these, 161 respondents indicated that an open-mouth odontoid view was not routinely included in their imaging protocol. Conclusions. There was considerable variability on how the problem of imaging of the odontoid was addressed, but overall there were enough data to begin to consider the concept that the open-mouth odontoid might not be needed in patients under 5 years of age if a lateral view is normal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034019483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034019483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10755760

AN - SCOPUS:0034019483

VL - 30

SP - 186

EP - 189

JO - Pediatric Radiology

JF - Pediatric Radiology

SN - 0301-0449

IS - 3

ER -