Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation?

Lara Varpio, Robert Bell, Gary Hollingworth, Alireza Jalali, Paul Haidet, Ruth Levine, Glenn Regehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent debates question the extent to which adopting an educational innovation requires compromise between the innovation's original design and the adoption site's context. Through compromises, the innovation's fundamental principles may be transferred, transformed, or abandoned. This paper analyzes such compromises during the piloting of Team-Based Learning (TBL). We ask: When is the process of transferring an innovation actually a process of transformation? This study is an autoethnography of our research team's implementation process. Autoethnographies are personalized accounts where authors draw on their own experiences to extend understanding of a particular topic. To conduct this autoethnography, we used an in-depth, interactive interview with the piloting clinician educator. In the analysis of TBL's fundamental principles, some aspects of the principles transferred easily, while others were transformed. Analysis raised concerns that the transformations threatened the foundational principles of TBL. While an educational innovation's techniques may seem to be surface structures, they are realizations of deeper fundamental principles. The fundamental principles are themselves realizations of the innovation's foundational philosophy. When techniques and/or principles are modified to a context, it is important to analyze if the modifications continue to uphold the innovation's philosophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-367
Number of pages11
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Learning
innovation
Teaching
compromise
Interviews
Research
learning
educator
interview
experience
philosophy

Keywords

  • Educational innovation
  • Qualitative research
  • Team-based learning (TBL)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation? / Varpio, Lara; Bell, Robert; Hollingworth, Gary; Jalali, Alireza; Haidet, Paul; Levine, Ruth; Regehr, Glenn.

In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 17, No. 3, 08.2012, p. 357-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Varpio, Lara ; Bell, Robert ; Hollingworth, Gary ; Jalali, Alireza ; Haidet, Paul ; Levine, Ruth ; Regehr, Glenn. / Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation?. In: Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2012 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 357-367.
@article{d1c6702278124cd585a56def8cfc4d82,
title = "Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation?",
abstract = "Recent debates question the extent to which adopting an educational innovation requires compromise between the innovation's original design and the adoption site's context. Through compromises, the innovation's fundamental principles may be transferred, transformed, or abandoned. This paper analyzes such compromises during the piloting of Team-Based Learning (TBL). We ask: When is the process of transferring an innovation actually a process of transformation? This study is an autoethnography of our research team's implementation process. Autoethnographies are personalized accounts where authors draw on their own experiences to extend understanding of a particular topic. To conduct this autoethnography, we used an in-depth, interactive interview with the piloting clinician educator. In the analysis of TBL's fundamental principles, some aspects of the principles transferred easily, while others were transformed. Analysis raised concerns that the transformations threatened the foundational principles of TBL. While an educational innovation's techniques may seem to be surface structures, they are realizations of deeper fundamental principles. The fundamental principles are themselves realizations of the innovation's foundational philosophy. When techniques and/or principles are modified to a context, it is important to analyze if the modifications continue to uphold the innovation's philosophy.",
keywords = "Educational innovation, Qualitative research, Team-based learning (TBL)",
author = "Lara Varpio and Robert Bell and Gary Hollingworth and Alireza Jalali and Paul Haidet and Ruth Levine and Glenn Regehr",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-011-9313-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "357--367",
journal = "Advances in Health Sciences Education",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation?

AU - Varpio, Lara

AU - Bell, Robert

AU - Hollingworth, Gary

AU - Jalali, Alireza

AU - Haidet, Paul

AU - Levine, Ruth

AU - Regehr, Glenn

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Recent debates question the extent to which adopting an educational innovation requires compromise between the innovation's original design and the adoption site's context. Through compromises, the innovation's fundamental principles may be transferred, transformed, or abandoned. This paper analyzes such compromises during the piloting of Team-Based Learning (TBL). We ask: When is the process of transferring an innovation actually a process of transformation? This study is an autoethnography of our research team's implementation process. Autoethnographies are personalized accounts where authors draw on their own experiences to extend understanding of a particular topic. To conduct this autoethnography, we used an in-depth, interactive interview with the piloting clinician educator. In the analysis of TBL's fundamental principles, some aspects of the principles transferred easily, while others were transformed. Analysis raised concerns that the transformations threatened the foundational principles of TBL. While an educational innovation's techniques may seem to be surface structures, they are realizations of deeper fundamental principles. The fundamental principles are themselves realizations of the innovation's foundational philosophy. When techniques and/or principles are modified to a context, it is important to analyze if the modifications continue to uphold the innovation's philosophy.

AB - Recent debates question the extent to which adopting an educational innovation requires compromise between the innovation's original design and the adoption site's context. Through compromises, the innovation's fundamental principles may be transferred, transformed, or abandoned. This paper analyzes such compromises during the piloting of Team-Based Learning (TBL). We ask: When is the process of transferring an innovation actually a process of transformation? This study is an autoethnography of our research team's implementation process. Autoethnographies are personalized accounts where authors draw on their own experiences to extend understanding of a particular topic. To conduct this autoethnography, we used an in-depth, interactive interview with the piloting clinician educator. In the analysis of TBL's fundamental principles, some aspects of the principles transferred easily, while others were transformed. Analysis raised concerns that the transformations threatened the foundational principles of TBL. While an educational innovation's techniques may seem to be surface structures, they are realizations of deeper fundamental principles. The fundamental principles are themselves realizations of the innovation's foundational philosophy. When techniques and/or principles are modified to a context, it is important to analyze if the modifications continue to uphold the innovation's philosophy.

KW - Educational innovation

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Team-based learning (TBL)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862684941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862684941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-011-9313-4

DO - 10.1007/s10459-011-9313-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 21725841

AN - SCOPUS:84862684941

VL - 17

SP - 357

EP - 367

JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education

JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 3

ER -