Item bias in the CAGE screening test for alcohol use disorders

Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Jeffrey R. Steinbauer, Alvah R. Cass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore potential item bias in the CAGE questions (mnemonic for cut-down, annoyed, guilty, and eye-opener) when used to screen for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, conducted in a university-based, family practice clinic, with the presence of an alcohol use disorder determined by structured diagnostic interview using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule. PATIENTS: A probability sample of 1,333 adult primary care patients, with oversampling of female and minority (African-American and Mexican-American) patients. MAIN RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed marked differences in the sensitivity and specificity of each CAGE question against a lifetime alcohol use disorder, across patient subgroups. Women, Mexican-American patients, and patients with annual incomes above $40,000 were consistently less likely to endorse each CAGE question 'yes,' after adjusting for the presence of an alcohol use disorder and pattern of alcohol consumption. In results from logistic regression analyses predicting an alcohol use disorder, cut-down was the only question retained in models for each of the subgroups. The guilty question did not contribute to the prediction of an alcohol use disorder: annoyed and eye-opener were inconsistent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its many advantages, the CAGE questionnaire is an inconsistent indicator of alcohol use disorders when used with male and female primary care patients of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds. Gender and cultural differences in the consequences of drinking and perceptions of problem alcohol use may explain these effects. These biases suggest the CAGE is a poor 'rule-out' screening test. Brief and unbiased screens for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)763-769
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Primary Health Care
Interviews
Sampling Studies
Family Practice
Alcohol Drinking
African Americans
Drinking
Appointments and Schedules
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Alcohol use disorders
  • Primary care
  • Screening
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Item bias in the CAGE screening test for alcohol use disorders. / Volk, Robert J.; Cantor, Scott B.; Steinbauer, Jeffrey R.; Cass, Alvah R.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 12, 1997, p. 763-769.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Volk, Robert J. ; Cantor, Scott B. ; Steinbauer, Jeffrey R. ; Cass, Alvah R. / Item bias in the CAGE screening test for alcohol use disorders. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 12, No. 12. pp. 763-769.
@article{f135f3d86c80405891375ea9f2a63985,
title = "Item bias in the CAGE screening test for alcohol use disorders",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To explore potential item bias in the CAGE questions (mnemonic for cut-down, annoyed, guilty, and eye-opener) when used to screen for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, conducted in a university-based, family practice clinic, with the presence of an alcohol use disorder determined by structured diagnostic interview using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule. PATIENTS: A probability sample of 1,333 adult primary care patients, with oversampling of female and minority (African-American and Mexican-American) patients. MAIN RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed marked differences in the sensitivity and specificity of each CAGE question against a lifetime alcohol use disorder, across patient subgroups. Women, Mexican-American patients, and patients with annual incomes above $40,000 were consistently less likely to endorse each CAGE question 'yes,' after adjusting for the presence of an alcohol use disorder and pattern of alcohol consumption. In results from logistic regression analyses predicting an alcohol use disorder, cut-down was the only question retained in models for each of the subgroups. The guilty question did not contribute to the prediction of an alcohol use disorder: annoyed and eye-opener were inconsistent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its many advantages, the CAGE questionnaire is an inconsistent indicator of alcohol use disorders when used with male and female primary care patients of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds. Gender and cultural differences in the consequences of drinking and perceptions of problem alcohol use may explain these effects. These biases suggest the CAGE is a poor 'rule-out' screening test. Brief and unbiased screens for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients are needed.",
keywords = "Alcohol use disorders, Primary care, Screening, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Volk, {Robert J.} and Cantor, {Scott B.} and Steinbauer, {Jeffrey R.} and Cass, {Alvah R.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07162.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "763--769",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item bias in the CAGE screening test for alcohol use disorders

AU - Volk, Robert J.

AU - Cantor, Scott B.

AU - Steinbauer, Jeffrey R.

AU - Cass, Alvah R.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To explore potential item bias in the CAGE questions (mnemonic for cut-down, annoyed, guilty, and eye-opener) when used to screen for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, conducted in a university-based, family practice clinic, with the presence of an alcohol use disorder determined by structured diagnostic interview using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule. PATIENTS: A probability sample of 1,333 adult primary care patients, with oversampling of female and minority (African-American and Mexican-American) patients. MAIN RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed marked differences in the sensitivity and specificity of each CAGE question against a lifetime alcohol use disorder, across patient subgroups. Women, Mexican-American patients, and patients with annual incomes above $40,000 were consistently less likely to endorse each CAGE question 'yes,' after adjusting for the presence of an alcohol use disorder and pattern of alcohol consumption. In results from logistic regression analyses predicting an alcohol use disorder, cut-down was the only question retained in models for each of the subgroups. The guilty question did not contribute to the prediction of an alcohol use disorder: annoyed and eye-opener were inconsistent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its many advantages, the CAGE questionnaire is an inconsistent indicator of alcohol use disorders when used with male and female primary care patients of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds. Gender and cultural differences in the consequences of drinking and perceptions of problem alcohol use may explain these effects. These biases suggest the CAGE is a poor 'rule-out' screening test. Brief and unbiased screens for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients are needed.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore potential item bias in the CAGE questions (mnemonic for cut-down, annoyed, guilty, and eye-opener) when used to screen for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, conducted in a university-based, family practice clinic, with the presence of an alcohol use disorder determined by structured diagnostic interview using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule. PATIENTS: A probability sample of 1,333 adult primary care patients, with oversampling of female and minority (African-American and Mexican-American) patients. MAIN RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses showed marked differences in the sensitivity and specificity of each CAGE question against a lifetime alcohol use disorder, across patient subgroups. Women, Mexican-American patients, and patients with annual incomes above $40,000 were consistently less likely to endorse each CAGE question 'yes,' after adjusting for the presence of an alcohol use disorder and pattern of alcohol consumption. In results from logistic regression analyses predicting an alcohol use disorder, cut-down was the only question retained in models for each of the subgroups. The guilty question did not contribute to the prediction of an alcohol use disorder: annoyed and eye-opener were inconsistent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its many advantages, the CAGE questionnaire is an inconsistent indicator of alcohol use disorders when used with male and female primary care patients of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds. Gender and cultural differences in the consequences of drinking and perceptions of problem alcohol use may explain these effects. These biases suggest the CAGE is a poor 'rule-out' screening test. Brief and unbiased screens for alcohol use disorders in primary care patients are needed.

KW - Alcohol use disorders

KW - Primary care

KW - Screening

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031437453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031437453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07162.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07162.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 763

EP - 769

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 12

ER -