(Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks

Breana J. Sylvester Dacy, Priya K. Nihalani, Christina M. Cestone, Daniel H. Robinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) mandates determining what educational practices are demonstrated to be effective through rigorous scientific research. What types of evidence are recommended practices based on? The authors analyzed 304 citations accompanying prescriptive statements in 6 recent teacher education textbooks. Prescriptive statements implied that if teachers or students performed A practice, then B student outcome would be likely to occur. Citations were categorized as primary (qualitative, correlational/descriptive, intervention) or secondary (books, review articles, literature reviews, meta-analyses, or position papers) sources. A relatively small percentage (18) of sources were random assignment intervention studies, considered by some as the gold standard, whereas 64% came from secondary sources. The authors discuss the issue of whether teacher education textbooks offer evidence-based practice as well as future directions for research.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-6
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Educational Research
    Volume104
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    textbook
    lack
    teacher
    education
    book review
    gold standard
    educational practice
    evidence
    student
    act
    literature

    Keywords

    • causality
    • evidence
    • prescriptives

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education

    Cite this

    Sylvester Dacy, B. J., Nihalani, P. K., Cestone, C. M., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). (Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks. Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903382947

    (Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks. / Sylvester Dacy, Breana J.; Nihalani, Priya K.; Cestone, Christina M.; Robinson, Daniel H.

    In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 104, No. 1, 2011, p. 1-6.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Sylvester Dacy, BJ, Nihalani, PK, Cestone, CM & Robinson, DH 2011, '(Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks', Journal of Educational Research, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903382947
    Sylvester Dacy, Breana J. ; Nihalani, Priya K. ; Cestone, Christina M. ; Robinson, Daniel H. / (Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks. In: Journal of Educational Research. 2011 ; Vol. 104, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
    @article{75ae7001b9f846de8af7477798cfcc0f,
    title = "(Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks",
    abstract = "The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) mandates determining what educational practices are demonstrated to be effective through rigorous scientific research. What types of evidence are recommended practices based on? The authors analyzed 304 citations accompanying prescriptive statements in 6 recent teacher education textbooks. Prescriptive statements implied that if teachers or students performed A practice, then B student outcome would be likely to occur. Citations were categorized as primary (qualitative, correlational/descriptive, intervention) or secondary (books, review articles, literature reviews, meta-analyses, or position papers) sources. A relatively small percentage (18) of sources were random assignment intervention studies, considered by some as the gold standard, whereas 64{\%} came from secondary sources. The authors discuss the issue of whether teacher education textbooks offer evidence-based practice as well as future directions for research.",
    keywords = "causality, evidence, prescriptives",
    author = "{Sylvester Dacy}, {Breana J.} and Nihalani, {Priya K.} and Cestone, {Christina M.} and Robinson, {Daniel H.}",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1080/00220670903382947",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "104",
    pages = "1--6",
    journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
    issn = "0022-0671",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - (Lack of) support for prescriptive statements in teacher education textbooks

    AU - Sylvester Dacy, Breana J.

    AU - Nihalani, Priya K.

    AU - Cestone, Christina M.

    AU - Robinson, Daniel H.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) mandates determining what educational practices are demonstrated to be effective through rigorous scientific research. What types of evidence are recommended practices based on? The authors analyzed 304 citations accompanying prescriptive statements in 6 recent teacher education textbooks. Prescriptive statements implied that if teachers or students performed A practice, then B student outcome would be likely to occur. Citations were categorized as primary (qualitative, correlational/descriptive, intervention) or secondary (books, review articles, literature reviews, meta-analyses, or position papers) sources. A relatively small percentage (18) of sources were random assignment intervention studies, considered by some as the gold standard, whereas 64% came from secondary sources. The authors discuss the issue of whether teacher education textbooks offer evidence-based practice as well as future directions for research.

    AB - The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) mandates determining what educational practices are demonstrated to be effective through rigorous scientific research. What types of evidence are recommended practices based on? The authors analyzed 304 citations accompanying prescriptive statements in 6 recent teacher education textbooks. Prescriptive statements implied that if teachers or students performed A practice, then B student outcome would be likely to occur. Citations were categorized as primary (qualitative, correlational/descriptive, intervention) or secondary (books, review articles, literature reviews, meta-analyses, or position papers) sources. A relatively small percentage (18) of sources were random assignment intervention studies, considered by some as the gold standard, whereas 64% came from secondary sources. The authors discuss the issue of whether teacher education textbooks offer evidence-based practice as well as future directions for research.

    KW - causality

    KW - evidence

    KW - prescriptives

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649581122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649581122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/00220670903382947

    DO - 10.1080/00220670903382947

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:78649581122

    VL - 104

    SP - 1

    EP - 6

    JO - Journal of Educational Research

    JF - Journal of Educational Research

    SN - 0022-0671

    IS - 1

    ER -