Laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms

George Kokosis, Eugene P. Ceppa, Douglas Tyler, Theodore N. Pappas, Alexander Perez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal neoplasms and compare with a contemporary cohort of open duodenectomy. Methods: Twelve cases of laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection and away from the ampulla performed from 2009 to 2011 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, patient comorbidities, procedural data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. These data were compared with the data derived from 6 patients who underwent open duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors. Results: Comparison of the laparoscopic to open duodenectomy data demonstrated that the length of stay was similar between the 2 groups (6.1±0.72 vs. 7±2.1, respectively, P>0.05), but the laparoscopic group was associated with a lower combined shortterm and long-term complication rate. Statistically significant difference in patients' body mass index (31±10 for the laparoscopic group vs. 22±4 for the open group, P<0.05) was yielded. The remainder of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were similar or not statistically different. The mean follow-up for the laparoscopic group was 12±3months. There were no recurrences in either group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial duodenal resection is a safe and effective alternative approach to managing patients with benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms that are not amenable to endoscopic resection and had similar outcomes compared with the traditional open resection with the added benefit of less postoperative incisional hernias, also suited for patients with higher body mass index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-162
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 17 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Duodenal Neoplasms
Body Mass Index
Neoplasms
Comorbidity
Length of Stay
Demography
Recurrence

Keywords

  • benign duodenal tumors
  • duodenal resection
  • laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms. / Kokosis, George; Ceppa, Eugene P.; Tyler, Douglas; Pappas, Theodore N.; Perez, Alexander.

In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Vol. 25, No. 2, 17.04.2015, p. 158-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6537751efa4e4cccad7a5e93e15c2357,
title = "Laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal neoplasms and compare with a contemporary cohort of open duodenectomy. Methods: Twelve cases of laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection and away from the ampulla performed from 2009 to 2011 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, patient comorbidities, procedural data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. These data were compared with the data derived from 6 patients who underwent open duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors. Results: Comparison of the laparoscopic to open duodenectomy data demonstrated that the length of stay was similar between the 2 groups (6.1±0.72 vs. 7±2.1, respectively, P>0.05), but the laparoscopic group was associated with a lower combined shortterm and long-term complication rate. Statistically significant difference in patients' body mass index (31±10 for the laparoscopic group vs. 22±4 for the open group, P<0.05) was yielded. The remainder of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were similar or not statistically different. The mean follow-up for the laparoscopic group was 12±3months. There were no recurrences in either group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial duodenal resection is a safe and effective alternative approach to managing patients with benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms that are not amenable to endoscopic resection and had similar outcomes compared with the traditional open resection with the added benefit of less postoperative incisional hernias, also suited for patients with higher body mass index.",
keywords = "benign duodenal tumors, duodenal resection, laparoscopy",
author = "George Kokosis and Ceppa, {Eugene P.} and Douglas Tyler and Pappas, {Theodore N.} and Alexander Perez",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1097/SLE.0000000000000106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "158--162",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy",
issn = "1051-7200",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms

AU - Kokosis, George

AU - Ceppa, Eugene P.

AU - Tyler, Douglas

AU - Pappas, Theodore N.

AU - Perez, Alexander

PY - 2015/4/17

Y1 - 2015/4/17

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal neoplasms and compare with a contemporary cohort of open duodenectomy. Methods: Twelve cases of laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection and away from the ampulla performed from 2009 to 2011 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, patient comorbidities, procedural data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. These data were compared with the data derived from 6 patients who underwent open duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors. Results: Comparison of the laparoscopic to open duodenectomy data demonstrated that the length of stay was similar between the 2 groups (6.1±0.72 vs. 7±2.1, respectively, P>0.05), but the laparoscopic group was associated with a lower combined shortterm and long-term complication rate. Statistically significant difference in patients' body mass index (31±10 for the laparoscopic group vs. 22±4 for the open group, P<0.05) was yielded. The remainder of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were similar or not statistically different. The mean follow-up for the laparoscopic group was 12±3months. There were no recurrences in either group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial duodenal resection is a safe and effective alternative approach to managing patients with benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms that are not amenable to endoscopic resection and had similar outcomes compared with the traditional open resection with the added benefit of less postoperative incisional hernias, also suited for patients with higher body mass index.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal neoplasms and compare with a contemporary cohort of open duodenectomy. Methods: Twelve cases of laparoscopic duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection and away from the ampulla performed from 2009 to 2011 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, patient comorbidities, procedural data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. These data were compared with the data derived from 6 patients who underwent open duodenectomy for benign duodenal tumors. Results: Comparison of the laparoscopic to open duodenectomy data demonstrated that the length of stay was similar between the 2 groups (6.1±0.72 vs. 7±2.1, respectively, P>0.05), but the laparoscopic group was associated with a lower combined shortterm and long-term complication rate. Statistically significant difference in patients' body mass index (31±10 for the laparoscopic group vs. 22±4 for the open group, P<0.05) was yielded. The remainder of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were similar or not statistically different. The mean follow-up for the laparoscopic group was 12±3months. There were no recurrences in either group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial duodenal resection is a safe and effective alternative approach to managing patients with benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms that are not amenable to endoscopic resection and had similar outcomes compared with the traditional open resection with the added benefit of less postoperative incisional hernias, also suited for patients with higher body mass index.

KW - benign duodenal tumors

KW - duodenal resection

KW - laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928087743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928087743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000106

DO - 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000106

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 158

EP - 162

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy

SN - 1051-7200

IS - 2

ER -