Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis

Supriya S. Patel, Madhukar S. Patel, Sanjit Mahanti, Adrian Ortega, Glenn T. Ault, Andreas M. Kaiser, Anthony J. Senagore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1063-1065
Number of pages3
JournalThe American surgeon
Volume78
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Length of Stay
Colon
Cross-Sectional Studies
Laparoscopy
Return to Work
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Patel, S. S., Patel, M. S., Mahanti, S., Ortega, A., Ault, G. T., Kaiser, A. M., & Senagore, A. J. (2012). Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis. The American surgeon, 78(10), 1063-1065.

Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California : A cross-sectional analysis. / Patel, Supriya S.; Patel, Madhukar S.; Mahanti, Sanjit; Ortega, Adrian; Ault, Glenn T.; Kaiser, Andreas M.; Senagore, Anthony J.

In: The American surgeon, Vol. 78, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1063-1065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, SS, Patel, MS, Mahanti, S, Ortega, A, Ault, GT, Kaiser, AM & Senagore, AJ 2012, 'Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis', The American surgeon, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1063-1065.
Patel SS, Patel MS, Mahanti S, Ortega A, Ault GT, Kaiser AM et al. Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis. The American surgeon. 2012 Oct;78(10):1063-1065.
Patel, Supriya S. ; Patel, Madhukar S. ; Mahanti, Sanjit ; Ortega, Adrian ; Ault, Glenn T. ; Kaiser, Andreas M. ; Senagore, Anthony J. / Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California : A cross-sectional analysis. In: The American surgeon. 2012 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 1063-1065.
@article{d3842a644e5f4af481dd0bf592d261e6,
title = "Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: A cross-sectional analysis",
abstract = "Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.",
author = "Patel, {Supriya S.} and Patel, {Madhukar S.} and Sanjit Mahanti and Adrian Ortega and Ault, {Glenn T.} and Kaiser, {Andreas M.} and Senagore, {Anthony J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1063--1065",
journal = "The American surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California

T2 - A cross-sectional analysis

AU - Patel, Supriya S.

AU - Patel, Madhukar S.

AU - Mahanti, Sanjit

AU - Ortega, Adrian

AU - Ault, Glenn T.

AU - Kaiser, Andreas M.

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.

AB - Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866765378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866765378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23025941

AN - SCOPUS:84866765378

VL - 78

SP - 1063

EP - 1065

JO - The American surgeon

JF - The American surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 10

ER -