Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients with Chronic Stroke

  • Francois Bethoux
  • , Helen L. Rogers
  • , Karen J. Nolan
  • , Gary M. Abrams
  • , Thiru Annaswamy
  • , Murray Brandstater
  • , Barbara Browne
  • , Judith M. Burnfield
  • , Wuwei Feng
  • , Mitchell J. Freed
  • , Carolyn Geis
  • , Jason Greenberg
  • , Mark Gudesblatt
  • , Farha Ikramuddin
  • , Arun Jayaraman
  • , Steven A. Kautz
  • , Helmi L. Lutsep
  • , Sangeetha Madhavan
  • , Jill Meilahn
  • , William S. Pease
  • Noel Rao, Subramani Seetharama, Pramod Sethi, Margaret A. Turk, Roi Ann Wallis, Conrad Kufta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Evidence supports peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation (FES) as an effective alternative to ankle foot orthoses (AFO) for treatment of foot drop poststroke, but few long-term, randomized controlled comparisons exist. Objective. Compare changes in gait quality and function between FES and AFOs in individuals with foot drop poststroke over a 12-month period. Methods. Follow-up analysis of an unblinded randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01087957) conducted at 30 rehabilitation centers comparing FES to AFOs over 6 months. Subjects continued to wear their randomized device for another 6 months to final 12-month assessments. Subjects used study devices for all home and community ambulation. Multiply imputed intention-to-treat analyses were utilized; primary endpoints were tested for noninferiority and secondary endpoints for superiority. Primary endpoints: 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and device-related serious adverse event rate. Secondary endpoints: 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), GaitRite Functional Ambulation Profile, and Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (mEFAP). Results. A total of 495 subjects were randomized, and 384 completed the 12-month follow-up. FES proved noninferior to AFOs for all primary endpoints. Both FES and AFO groups showed statistically and clinically significant improvement for 10MWT compared with initial measurement. No statistically significant between-group differences were found for primary or secondary endpoints. The FES group demonstrated statistically significant improvements for 6MWT and mEFAP Stair-time subscore. Conclusions. At 12 months, both FES and AFOs continue to demonstrate equivalent gains in gait speed. Results suggest that long-term FES use may lead to additional improvements in walking endurance and functional ambulation; further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-922
Number of pages12
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ankle foot orthosis
  • foot drop
  • functional electrical stimulation
  • gait speed
  • quality of life
  • stroke rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients with Chronic Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this