Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model

Lisa M. Pierce, Arundhati Rao, Shannon S. Baumann, Jocylen E. Glassberg, Thomas J. Kuehl, Tristi W. Muir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of graft type, site of implantation, and ovariectomy on the long-term histologic response to graft materials used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Study Design: In all, 45 rabbits underwent ovariectomy or sham laparotomy and were implanted with polypropylene (PP) mesh (n = 23) or cross-linked porcine dermis (PS) (n = 22) in the vagina and abdomen. Grafts were harvested 9 months later and were processed for histology to evaluate the host inflammatory response and degree of tissue incorporation within the grafts. Results: Polypropylene induced a milder (P < .007), more uniform response than PS, whereas PS elicited a more variable response and degraded by 9 months. Vaginal grafts had higher scores for inflammation (P = .005) and neovascularization (P < .001), and had lower scores for fibroblastic proliferation (P < .001) than abdominal grafts. Ovariectomy had no effect (P > .05). Conclusion: Synthetic and biologic grafts evoke different foreign body responses, which may have implications for surgical outcomes in women.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Volume200
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2009

    Fingerprint

    Vagina
    Abdomen
    Rabbits
    Transplants
    Polypropylenes
    Ovariectomy
    Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
    Dermis
    Foreign Bodies
    Laparotomy
    Histology
    Swine

    Keywords

    • biologic graft
    • pelvic organ prolapse
    • polypropylene mesh
    • porcine dermis
    • rabbit model
    • synthetic graft

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Cite this

    Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model. / Pierce, Lisa M.; Rao, Arundhati; Baumann, Shannon S.; Glassberg, Jocylen E.; Kuehl, Thomas J.; Muir, Tristi W.

    In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 200, No. 5, 05.2009.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Pierce, Lisa M. ; Rao, Arundhati ; Baumann, Shannon S. ; Glassberg, Jocylen E. ; Kuehl, Thomas J. ; Muir, Tristi W. / Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009 ; Vol. 200, No. 5.
    @article{923e5ecd70154d95acfde8bb228adc02,
    title = "Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model",
    abstract = "Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of graft type, site of implantation, and ovariectomy on the long-term histologic response to graft materials used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Study Design: In all, 45 rabbits underwent ovariectomy or sham laparotomy and were implanted with polypropylene (PP) mesh (n = 23) or cross-linked porcine dermis (PS) (n = 22) in the vagina and abdomen. Grafts were harvested 9 months later and were processed for histology to evaluate the host inflammatory response and degree of tissue incorporation within the grafts. Results: Polypropylene induced a milder (P < .007), more uniform response than PS, whereas PS elicited a more variable response and degraded by 9 months. Vaginal grafts had higher scores for inflammation (P = .005) and neovascularization (P < .001), and had lower scores for fibroblastic proliferation (P < .001) than abdominal grafts. Ovariectomy had no effect (P > .05). Conclusion: Synthetic and biologic grafts evoke different foreign body responses, which may have implications for surgical outcomes in women.",
    keywords = "biologic graft, pelvic organ prolapse, polypropylene mesh, porcine dermis, rabbit model, synthetic graft",
    author = "Pierce, {Lisa M.} and Arundhati Rao and Baumann, {Shannon S.} and Glassberg, {Jocylen E.} and Kuehl, {Thomas J.} and Muir, {Tristi W.}",
    year = "2009",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.040",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "200",
    journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
    issn = "0002-9378",
    publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model

    AU - Pierce, Lisa M.

    AU - Rao, Arundhati

    AU - Baumann, Shannon S.

    AU - Glassberg, Jocylen E.

    AU - Kuehl, Thomas J.

    AU - Muir, Tristi W.

    PY - 2009/5

    Y1 - 2009/5

    N2 - Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of graft type, site of implantation, and ovariectomy on the long-term histologic response to graft materials used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Study Design: In all, 45 rabbits underwent ovariectomy or sham laparotomy and were implanted with polypropylene (PP) mesh (n = 23) or cross-linked porcine dermis (PS) (n = 22) in the vagina and abdomen. Grafts were harvested 9 months later and were processed for histology to evaluate the host inflammatory response and degree of tissue incorporation within the grafts. Results: Polypropylene induced a milder (P < .007), more uniform response than PS, whereas PS elicited a more variable response and degraded by 9 months. Vaginal grafts had higher scores for inflammation (P = .005) and neovascularization (P < .001), and had lower scores for fibroblastic proliferation (P < .001) than abdominal grafts. Ovariectomy had no effect (P > .05). Conclusion: Synthetic and biologic grafts evoke different foreign body responses, which may have implications for surgical outcomes in women.

    AB - Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of graft type, site of implantation, and ovariectomy on the long-term histologic response to graft materials used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Study Design: In all, 45 rabbits underwent ovariectomy or sham laparotomy and were implanted with polypropylene (PP) mesh (n = 23) or cross-linked porcine dermis (PS) (n = 22) in the vagina and abdomen. Grafts were harvested 9 months later and were processed for histology to evaluate the host inflammatory response and degree of tissue incorporation within the grafts. Results: Polypropylene induced a milder (P < .007), more uniform response than PS, whereas PS elicited a more variable response and degraded by 9 months. Vaginal grafts had higher scores for inflammation (P = .005) and neovascularization (P < .001), and had lower scores for fibroblastic proliferation (P < .001) than abdominal grafts. Ovariectomy had no effect (P > .05). Conclusion: Synthetic and biologic grafts evoke different foreign body responses, which may have implications for surgical outcomes in women.

    KW - biologic graft

    KW - pelvic organ prolapse

    KW - polypropylene mesh

    KW - porcine dermis

    KW - rabbit model

    KW - synthetic graft

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64249121696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64249121696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.040

    DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.040

    M3 - Article

    VL - 200

    JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    SN - 0002-9378

    IS - 5

    ER -