Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents

Cross-lagged panel analysis

Joris Van Ouytsel, Yu Lu, Koen Ponnet, Michel Walrave, Jeffrey Temple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: While adolescent sexting, or the sending of sexually explicit images, has been cross-sectionally associated with bullying and cyberbullying, there is a lack of longitudinal studies in this area. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the longitudinal link between sexting and 1) traditional, in-person, bullying victimization and 2) cyberbullying victimization. Methods: We used data from a longitudinal study of ethnically diverse adolescents recruited from multiple public high schools in southeast Texas. Three waves of data were used (T2, T3 and T4). Cross-lagged panel analysis was performed in Mplus to analyze the data. Results & Conclusions: Cross-lagged panel analyses identified autoregressive effects for all three variables, and cross-lagged effects for cyberbullying. Sexting was associated with subsequent cyberbullying victimization across all time points, and T3 cyberbullying victimization was associated with engagement in sexting one year later. Furthermore, T2 cyberbullying victimization indirectly associated with T4 sexting via T3 cyberbullying victimization. For traditional bullying, a cross-lagged effect was found between T3 sexting and T4 offline bullying victimization. Although T2 sexting did not directly link to subsequent traditional bullying victimization, a significant mediation effect was identified such that T3 sexting mediated the effects of T2 sexting on T4 traditional bullying victimization. Results show that sexting adolescents may be at risk for (cyber)bullying victimization and highlight the need to address both sexting and bullying in prevention and intervention efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-41
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Adolescence
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Bullying
Crime Victims
Longitudinal Studies

Keywords

  • Bullying
  • Cyberbullying
  • Sexting
  • Sexual pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents : Cross-lagged panel analysis. / Van Ouytsel, Joris; Lu, Yu; Ponnet, Koen; Walrave, Michel; Temple, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 73, 01.06.2019, p. 36-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7bd707a360f4c44afe7b7125a7ba0f5,
title = "Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents: Cross-lagged panel analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: While adolescent sexting, or the sending of sexually explicit images, has been cross-sectionally associated with bullying and cyberbullying, there is a lack of longitudinal studies in this area. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the longitudinal link between sexting and 1) traditional, in-person, bullying victimization and 2) cyberbullying victimization. Methods: We used data from a longitudinal study of ethnically diverse adolescents recruited from multiple public high schools in southeast Texas. Three waves of data were used (T2, T3 and T4). Cross-lagged panel analysis was performed in Mplus to analyze the data. Results & Conclusions: Cross-lagged panel analyses identified autoregressive effects for all three variables, and cross-lagged effects for cyberbullying. Sexting was associated with subsequent cyberbullying victimization across all time points, and T3 cyberbullying victimization was associated with engagement in sexting one year later. Furthermore, T2 cyberbullying victimization indirectly associated with T4 sexting via T3 cyberbullying victimization. For traditional bullying, a cross-lagged effect was found between T3 sexting and T4 offline bullying victimization. Although T2 sexting did not directly link to subsequent traditional bullying victimization, a significant mediation effect was identified such that T3 sexting mediated the effects of T2 sexting on T4 traditional bullying victimization. Results show that sexting adolescents may be at risk for (cyber)bullying victimization and highlight the need to address both sexting and bullying in prevention and intervention efforts.",
keywords = "Bullying, Cyberbullying, Sexting, Sexual pressure",
author = "{Van Ouytsel}, Joris and Yu Lu and Koen Ponnet and Michel Walrave and Jeffrey Temple",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "36--41",
journal = "Journal of Adolescence",
issn = "0140-1971",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents

T2 - Cross-lagged panel analysis

AU - Van Ouytsel, Joris

AU - Lu, Yu

AU - Ponnet, Koen

AU - Walrave, Michel

AU - Temple, Jeffrey

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Introduction: While adolescent sexting, or the sending of sexually explicit images, has been cross-sectionally associated with bullying and cyberbullying, there is a lack of longitudinal studies in this area. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the longitudinal link between sexting and 1) traditional, in-person, bullying victimization and 2) cyberbullying victimization. Methods: We used data from a longitudinal study of ethnically diverse adolescents recruited from multiple public high schools in southeast Texas. Three waves of data were used (T2, T3 and T4). Cross-lagged panel analysis was performed in Mplus to analyze the data. Results & Conclusions: Cross-lagged panel analyses identified autoregressive effects for all three variables, and cross-lagged effects for cyberbullying. Sexting was associated with subsequent cyberbullying victimization across all time points, and T3 cyberbullying victimization was associated with engagement in sexting one year later. Furthermore, T2 cyberbullying victimization indirectly associated with T4 sexting via T3 cyberbullying victimization. For traditional bullying, a cross-lagged effect was found between T3 sexting and T4 offline bullying victimization. Although T2 sexting did not directly link to subsequent traditional bullying victimization, a significant mediation effect was identified such that T3 sexting mediated the effects of T2 sexting on T4 traditional bullying victimization. Results show that sexting adolescents may be at risk for (cyber)bullying victimization and highlight the need to address both sexting and bullying in prevention and intervention efforts.

AB - Introduction: While adolescent sexting, or the sending of sexually explicit images, has been cross-sectionally associated with bullying and cyberbullying, there is a lack of longitudinal studies in this area. To address this gap in the literature, we examined the longitudinal link between sexting and 1) traditional, in-person, bullying victimization and 2) cyberbullying victimization. Methods: We used data from a longitudinal study of ethnically diverse adolescents recruited from multiple public high schools in southeast Texas. Three waves of data were used (T2, T3 and T4). Cross-lagged panel analysis was performed in Mplus to analyze the data. Results & Conclusions: Cross-lagged panel analyses identified autoregressive effects for all three variables, and cross-lagged effects for cyberbullying. Sexting was associated with subsequent cyberbullying victimization across all time points, and T3 cyberbullying victimization was associated with engagement in sexting one year later. Furthermore, T2 cyberbullying victimization indirectly associated with T4 sexting via T3 cyberbullying victimization. For traditional bullying, a cross-lagged effect was found between T3 sexting and T4 offline bullying victimization. Although T2 sexting did not directly link to subsequent traditional bullying victimization, a significant mediation effect was identified such that T3 sexting mediated the effects of T2 sexting on T4 traditional bullying victimization. Results show that sexting adolescents may be at risk for (cyber)bullying victimization and highlight the need to address both sexting and bullying in prevention and intervention efforts.

KW - Bullying

KW - Cyberbullying

KW - Sexting

KW - Sexual pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063758801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063758801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 36

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Adolescence

JF - Journal of Adolescence

SN - 0140-1971

ER -