TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss of chance doctrine
T2 - An emerging theory of medical malpractice liability
AU - Allen, Timothy Craig
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Traditional medical malpractice law requires plaintiffs, to be successful in a lawsuit, to show proximate cause, that is, to prove that the defendant physician's actions more likely than not caused the patient's injuries. The loss of chance doctrine views a person's prospect for surviving a serious medical condition as something of value, even if the possibility of recovery was less than 50%. The loss of chance doctrine is controversial, and both proponents and opponents have strong arguments regarding courts' instituting it in medical malpractice cases. These arguments, and the potential future of the theory in medical malpractice cases, are discussed.
AB - Traditional medical malpractice law requires plaintiffs, to be successful in a lawsuit, to show proximate cause, that is, to prove that the defendant physician's actions more likely than not caused the patient's injuries. The loss of chance doctrine views a person's prospect for surviving a serious medical condition as something of value, even if the possibility of recovery was less than 50%. The loss of chance doctrine is controversial, and both proponents and opponents have strong arguments regarding courts' instituting it in medical malpractice cases. These arguments, and the potential future of the theory in medical malpractice cases, are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864183972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864183972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCR.0b013e3182675060
DO - 10.1097/PCR.0b013e3182675060
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84864183972
SN - 1082-9784
VL - 17
SP - 172
EP - 174
JO - Pathology Case Reviews
JF - Pathology Case Reviews
IS - 4
ER -