Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
UTMB Health Research Expert Profiles Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Experts
Departments
Equipment
Projects/Grants
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Honors
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Lumen-apposing stents versus plastic stents in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: A large, comparative, international, multicenter study
Juliana Yang
, Yen I. Chen
, Shai Friedland
, Ian Holmes
, Christopher Paiji
, Ryan Law
, Amy Hosmer
, Tyler Stevens
, Franco Matheus
, Rishi Pawa
, Nihar Mathur
, Divyesh Sejpal
, Sumant Inamdar
, Tyler M. Berzin
, Christopher J. Dimaio
, Sanchit Gupta
, Patrick S. Yachimski
, Andrea Anderloni
, Alessandro Repici
, Theodore James
Laith H. Jamil, Mel Ona, Simon K. Lo, Srinivas Gaddam, Markus Dollhopf, Nuha Alammar, Eugenie Shieh, Majidah Bukhari, Vivek Kumbhari, Vikesh Singh, Olaya Brewer, Omid Sanaei, Lea Fayad, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Eun Ji Shin, Todd H. Baron, Mouen A. Khashab
Show 17 others
Show less
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
57
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lumen-apposing stents versus plastic stents in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: A large, comparative, international, multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
6-month Follow-up
12%
Adverse Events
37%
Clinical Efficacy
37%
Debris
12%
Double pigtail Plastic Stent
75%
International multicenter Study
100%
Large-caliber
87%
Length of Hospital Stay
12%
Lumen-apposing Metal Stent
100%
Need for Surgery
25%
Overall Rate
12%
Pancreatic Fluid Collections
12%
Pancreatic Pseudocyst
100%
Percutaneous Drainage
12%
Percutaneous Intervention
12%
Plastic Stent
100%
Procedure Time
12%
Recurrence Rate
12%
Small Caliber
12%
Stent Dysfunction
12%
Technical Success
25%
Medicine and Dentistry
Adverse Event
50%
Pancreas Pseudocyst
100%
Percutaneous Drainage
16%
Percutaneous Intervention
16%
Recurrence Risk
16%
Recurrent Disease
16%
Retrospective Study
16%