Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices

Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols

Laura Horwood, Anil Attili, Luba Frank, El Sayed H. Ibrahim, Hemant Parmar, Jadranka Stojanovska, Sharon Gadoth-Goodman, Carey Fette, Hakan Oral, Frank Bogun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. Methods and results: A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32%) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m. Conclusion: Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)812-817
Number of pages6
JournalEuropace
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Equipment and Supplies
Implantable Defibrillators
Brain

Keywords

  • Abandoned leads
  • Cardiac implanted electronic devices
  • Contraindication
  • Devices on advisory
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Pacemaker dependency
  • Recalled devices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices : Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols. / Horwood, Laura; Attili, Anil; Frank, Luba; Ibrahim, El Sayed H.; Parmar, Hemant; Stojanovska, Jadranka; Gadoth-Goodman, Sharon; Fette, Carey; Oral, Hakan; Bogun, Frank.

In: Europace, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 812-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Horwood, L, Attili, A, Frank, L, Ibrahim, ESH, Parmar, H, Stojanovska, J, Gadoth-Goodman, S, Fette, C, Oral, H & Bogun, F 2017, 'Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols', Europace, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 812-817. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw122
Horwood, Laura ; Attili, Anil ; Frank, Luba ; Ibrahim, El Sayed H. ; Parmar, Hemant ; Stojanovska, Jadranka ; Gadoth-Goodman, Sharon ; Fette, Carey ; Oral, Hakan ; Bogun, Frank. / Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices : Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols. In: Europace. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 812-817.
@article{ca517d8cc13f4cf787d56924c098fb68,
title = "Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols",
abstract = "Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. Methods and results: A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32{\%}) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m. Conclusion: Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.",
keywords = "Abandoned leads, Cardiac implanted electronic devices, Contraindication, Devices on advisory, Magnetic resonance imaging, Pacemaker dependency, Recalled devices",
author = "Laura Horwood and Anil Attili and Luba Frank and Ibrahim, {El Sayed H.} and Hemant Parmar and Jadranka Stojanovska and Sharon Gadoth-Goodman and Carey Fette and Hakan Oral and Frank Bogun",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/europace/euw122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "812--817",
journal = "Europace",
issn = "1099-5129",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices

T2 - Focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols

AU - Horwood, Laura

AU - Attili, Anil

AU - Frank, Luba

AU - Ibrahim, El Sayed H.

AU - Parmar, Hemant

AU - Stojanovska, Jadranka

AU - Gadoth-Goodman, Sharon

AU - Fette, Carey

AU - Oral, Hakan

AU - Bogun, Frank

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. Methods and results: A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32%) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m. Conclusion: Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.

AB - Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. Methods and results: A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32%) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m. Conclusion: Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.

KW - Abandoned leads

KW - Cardiac implanted electronic devices

KW - Contraindication

KW - Devices on advisory

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Pacemaker dependency

KW - Recalled devices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027401665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027401665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/europace/euw122

DO - 10.1093/europace/euw122

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 812

EP - 817

JO - Europace

JF - Europace

SN - 1099-5129

IS - 5

ER -