Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform

Ronald M. Stewart, Kathy Geoghegan, John G. Myers, Kenneth R. Sirinek, Michael G. Corneille, Deborah Mueller, Daniel L. Dent, Steven Wolf, Basil A. Pruitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rising medical malpractice premiums have reached a crisis point in many areas of the United States. In 2003 the Texas legislature passed a comprehensive package of tort reform laws that included a cap at $250,000 on noneconomic damages in most medical malpractice cases. We hypothesized that tort reform laws significantly reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuit in an academic medical center. We compared malpractice prevalence, incidence, and liability costs before and after comprehensive state tort reform measures were implemented. Study Design: Two prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice risk: a surgical operation database and a risk management and malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into pretort reform (1992 to 2004) and post-tort reform groups (2004 to the present). Operative procedures were included for elective, urgent, and emergency general surgery procedures. Results: During the study period, 98,513 general surgical procedures were performed. A total of 28 lawsuits (25 pre-reform, 3 postreform) were filed, naming general surgery faculty or residents. The prevalence of lawsuits filed/100,000 procedures performed is as follows: before reform, 40 lawsuits/100,000 procedures, and after reform, 8 lawsuits/100,000 procedures (p < 0.01, relative risk 0.21 [95% CI 0.063 to 0.62]). Virtually all of the liability and defense cost was in the pretort reform period: $595,000/year versus $515/year in the postreform group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of comprehensive tort reform in Texas was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence and cost of surgical malpractice lawsuits at one academic medical center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume212
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Legal Liability
Malpractice
Costs and Cost Analysis
Databases
Operative Surgical Procedures
Risk Management
Emergencies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Stewart, R. M., Geoghegan, K., Myers, J. G., Sirinek, K. R., Corneille, M. G., Mueller, D., ... Pruitt, B. A. (2011). Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 212(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025

Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform. / Stewart, Ronald M.; Geoghegan, Kathy; Myers, John G.; Sirinek, Kenneth R.; Corneille, Michael G.; Mueller, Deborah; Dent, Daniel L.; Wolf, Steven; Pruitt, Basil A.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 212, No. 4, 01.04.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stewart, RM, Geoghegan, K, Myers, JG, Sirinek, KR, Corneille, MG, Mueller, D, Dent, DL, Wolf, S & Pruitt, BA 2011, 'Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 212, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025
Stewart, Ronald M. ; Geoghegan, Kathy ; Myers, John G. ; Sirinek, Kenneth R. ; Corneille, Michael G. ; Mueller, Deborah ; Dent, Daniel L. ; Wolf, Steven ; Pruitt, Basil A. / Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011 ; Vol. 212, No. 4.
@article{f63bec9ef26941afa32664f9cd5d615f,
title = "Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform",
abstract = "Background: Rising medical malpractice premiums have reached a crisis point in many areas of the United States. In 2003 the Texas legislature passed a comprehensive package of tort reform laws that included a cap at $250,000 on noneconomic damages in most medical malpractice cases. We hypothesized that tort reform laws significantly reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuit in an academic medical center. We compared malpractice prevalence, incidence, and liability costs before and after comprehensive state tort reform measures were implemented. Study Design: Two prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice risk: a surgical operation database and a risk management and malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into pretort reform (1992 to 2004) and post-tort reform groups (2004 to the present). Operative procedures were included for elective, urgent, and emergency general surgery procedures. Results: During the study period, 98,513 general surgical procedures were performed. A total of 28 lawsuits (25 pre-reform, 3 postreform) were filed, naming general surgery faculty or residents. The prevalence of lawsuits filed/100,000 procedures performed is as follows: before reform, 40 lawsuits/100,000 procedures, and after reform, 8 lawsuits/100,000 procedures (p < 0.01, relative risk 0.21 [95{\%} CI 0.063 to 0.62]). Virtually all of the liability and defense cost was in the pretort reform period: $595,000/year versus $515/year in the postreform group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of comprehensive tort reform in Texas was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence and cost of surgical malpractice lawsuits at one academic medical center.",
author = "Stewart, {Ronald M.} and Kathy Geoghegan and Myers, {John G.} and Sirinek, {Kenneth R.} and Corneille, {Michael G.} and Deborah Mueller and Dent, {Daniel L.} and Steven Wolf and Pruitt, {Basil A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform

AU - Stewart, Ronald M.

AU - Geoghegan, Kathy

AU - Myers, John G.

AU - Sirinek, Kenneth R.

AU - Corneille, Michael G.

AU - Mueller, Deborah

AU - Dent, Daniel L.

AU - Wolf, Steven

AU - Pruitt, Basil A.

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Background: Rising medical malpractice premiums have reached a crisis point in many areas of the United States. In 2003 the Texas legislature passed a comprehensive package of tort reform laws that included a cap at $250,000 on noneconomic damages in most medical malpractice cases. We hypothesized that tort reform laws significantly reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuit in an academic medical center. We compared malpractice prevalence, incidence, and liability costs before and after comprehensive state tort reform measures were implemented. Study Design: Two prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice risk: a surgical operation database and a risk management and malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into pretort reform (1992 to 2004) and post-tort reform groups (2004 to the present). Operative procedures were included for elective, urgent, and emergency general surgery procedures. Results: During the study period, 98,513 general surgical procedures were performed. A total of 28 lawsuits (25 pre-reform, 3 postreform) were filed, naming general surgery faculty or residents. The prevalence of lawsuits filed/100,000 procedures performed is as follows: before reform, 40 lawsuits/100,000 procedures, and after reform, 8 lawsuits/100,000 procedures (p < 0.01, relative risk 0.21 [95% CI 0.063 to 0.62]). Virtually all of the liability and defense cost was in the pretort reform period: $595,000/year versus $515/year in the postreform group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of comprehensive tort reform in Texas was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence and cost of surgical malpractice lawsuits at one academic medical center.

AB - Background: Rising medical malpractice premiums have reached a crisis point in many areas of the United States. In 2003 the Texas legislature passed a comprehensive package of tort reform laws that included a cap at $250,000 on noneconomic damages in most medical malpractice cases. We hypothesized that tort reform laws significantly reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuit in an academic medical center. We compared malpractice prevalence, incidence, and liability costs before and after comprehensive state tort reform measures were implemented. Study Design: Two prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice risk: a surgical operation database and a risk management and malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into pretort reform (1992 to 2004) and post-tort reform groups (2004 to the present). Operative procedures were included for elective, urgent, and emergency general surgery procedures. Results: During the study period, 98,513 general surgical procedures were performed. A total of 28 lawsuits (25 pre-reform, 3 postreform) were filed, naming general surgery faculty or residents. The prevalence of lawsuits filed/100,000 procedures performed is as follows: before reform, 40 lawsuits/100,000 procedures, and after reform, 8 lawsuits/100,000 procedures (p < 0.01, relative risk 0.21 [95% CI 0.063 to 0.62]). Virtually all of the liability and defense cost was in the pretort reform period: $595,000/year versus $515/year in the postreform group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Implementation of comprehensive tort reform in Texas was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence and cost of surgical malpractice lawsuits at one academic medical center.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953780015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953780015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025

M3 - Article

VL - 212

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -