Management of rectal prolapse

The role of laparoscopic approaches

Dan R. Metcalf, Anthony J. Senagore

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75% of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25-50% will have significant constipation [1]-[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition-7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management
PublisherSpringer Milan
Pages153-156
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9788847006836
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rectal Prolapse
Anal Canal
Constipation
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Metcalf, D. R., & Senagore, A. J. (2008). Management of rectal prolapse: The role of laparoscopic approaches. In Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management (pp. 153-156). Springer Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20

Management of rectal prolapse : The role of laparoscopic approaches. / Metcalf, Dan R.; Senagore, Anthony J.

Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Springer Milan, 2008. p. 153-156.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Metcalf, DR & Senagore, AJ 2008, Management of rectal prolapse: The role of laparoscopic approaches. in Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Springer Milan, pp. 153-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20
Metcalf DR, Senagore AJ. Management of rectal prolapse: The role of laparoscopic approaches. In Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Springer Milan. 2008. p. 153-156 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20
Metcalf, Dan R. ; Senagore, Anthony J. / Management of rectal prolapse : The role of laparoscopic approaches. Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Springer Milan, 2008. pp. 153-156
@inbook{f0dbd82b76c04e7792add3e3a75a531e,
title = "Management of rectal prolapse: The role of laparoscopic approaches",
abstract = "Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75{\%} of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25-50{\%} will have significant constipation [1]-[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition-7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.",
author = "Metcalf, {Dan R.} and Senagore, {Anthony J.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9788847006836",
pages = "153--156",
booktitle = "Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management",
publisher = "Springer Milan",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Management of rectal prolapse

T2 - The role of laparoscopic approaches

AU - Metcalf, Dan R.

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75% of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25-50% will have significant constipation [1]-[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition-7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.

AB - Rectal prolapse has a profound effect on quality of life and has been associated with a multitude of surgical treatment options since its original description. It is defined as a full-thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal sphincter. Clinical management is confounded by the fact that whereas 75% of patients with rectal prolapse experience problems with anal incontinence, 25-50% will have significant constipation [1]-[4]. Symptoms of anal incontinence may be due to acquired changes in bowel motility or a reduction in resting anal pressure as a result of continual activation of rectoanal inhibition-7]. Constipation in patients with rectal prolapse may be a consequence of slow colonic transit or an increase in external anal sphincter contractions 4, 8. These symptoms have a significant influence on the choice of operative approach in the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, due to the variable results of operative approaches, it is unclear whether optimal treatment can be selected based on preoperative physiologic testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892038896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892038896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20

DO - 10.1007/978-88-470-0684-3_20

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788847006836

SP - 153

EP - 156

BT - Rectal Prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Management

PB - Springer Milan

ER -