Management of Zygomatic Fractures: A National Survey

Joseph M. Baylan, Daniel Jupiter, Wendy L. Parker, Marcin Czerwinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:: Repair of zygomatic fractures can be classified into the early closed reduction or the more recent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) methods. Surgical training and literature advocate ORIF, but the actual frequency of the different techniques in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in the management of zygomatic fractures among US surgeons and elucidate their influences. METHODS:: A 10-question survey was developed and distributed to over 16,000 practicing US facial trauma surgeons, including plastic surgeons (PS), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT). The survey queried training background, zygoma fracture treatment preferences, and rationale. Responses were tabulated and both univariate and bivariate statistical analyses completed. RESULTS:: One thousand six hundred eleven (10%) total responses were received. Zygomatic fractures are treated most commonly by OMFS (61%), then PS (20%) and ENT (19%), with 71% of repairs being performed in private practice. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation is the most common treatment modality (81%), with most surgeons using 2 to 3 sites for exposure, reduction, and fixation with titanium miniplates (70%). Thirty-five percent of surgeons perform routine orbital floor exploration. Forty-three percent quoted training and 32% reported accuracy of repair as the primary reason for choosing ORIF. CONCLUSIONS:: This is the largest reported survey on the repair of zygoma fractures. The response rate suggests dominance of OMFS in zygoma fracture care, an area pioneered by PS. Evolution of technique is also evident by predominance of ORIF with emphasis of multiple points of exposure, reduction, and fixation with rigid hardware.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 14 2016

Fingerprint

Zygomatic Fractures
Zygoma
Private Practice
antineoplaston A10
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Titanium
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Management of Zygomatic Fractures : A National Survey. / Baylan, Joseph M.; Jupiter, Daniel; Parker, Wendy L.; Czerwinski, Marcin.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 14.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baylan, Joseph M. ; Jupiter, Daniel ; Parker, Wendy L. ; Czerwinski, Marcin. / Management of Zygomatic Fractures : A National Survey. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016.
@article{bbbafb253d0e495cb873e1340cdacee9,
title = "Management of Zygomatic Fractures: A National Survey",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION:: Repair of zygomatic fractures can be classified into the early closed reduction or the more recent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) methods. Surgical training and literature advocate ORIF, but the actual frequency of the different techniques in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in the management of zygomatic fractures among US surgeons and elucidate their influences. METHODS:: A 10-question survey was developed and distributed to over 16,000 practicing US facial trauma surgeons, including plastic surgeons (PS), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT). The survey queried training background, zygoma fracture treatment preferences, and rationale. Responses were tabulated and both univariate and bivariate statistical analyses completed. RESULTS:: One thousand six hundred eleven (10{\%}) total responses were received. Zygomatic fractures are treated most commonly by OMFS (61{\%}), then PS (20{\%}) and ENT (19{\%}), with 71{\%} of repairs being performed in private practice. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation is the most common treatment modality (81{\%}), with most surgeons using 2 to 3 sites for exposure, reduction, and fixation with titanium miniplates (70{\%}). Thirty-five percent of surgeons perform routine orbital floor exploration. Forty-three percent quoted training and 32{\%} reported accuracy of repair as the primary reason for choosing ORIF. CONCLUSIONS:: This is the largest reported survey on the repair of zygoma fractures. The response rate suggests dominance of OMFS in zygoma fracture care, an area pioneered by PS. Evolution of technique is also evident by predominance of ORIF with emphasis of multiple points of exposure, reduction, and fixation with rigid hardware.",
author = "Baylan, {Joseph M.} and Daniel Jupiter and Parker, {Wendy L.} and Marcin Czerwinski",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000002880",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of Zygomatic Fractures

T2 - A National Survey

AU - Baylan, Joseph M.

AU - Jupiter, Daniel

AU - Parker, Wendy L.

AU - Czerwinski, Marcin

PY - 2016/7/14

Y1 - 2016/7/14

N2 - INTRODUCTION:: Repair of zygomatic fractures can be classified into the early closed reduction or the more recent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) methods. Surgical training and literature advocate ORIF, but the actual frequency of the different techniques in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in the management of zygomatic fractures among US surgeons and elucidate their influences. METHODS:: A 10-question survey was developed and distributed to over 16,000 practicing US facial trauma surgeons, including plastic surgeons (PS), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT). The survey queried training background, zygoma fracture treatment preferences, and rationale. Responses were tabulated and both univariate and bivariate statistical analyses completed. RESULTS:: One thousand six hundred eleven (10%) total responses were received. Zygomatic fractures are treated most commonly by OMFS (61%), then PS (20%) and ENT (19%), with 71% of repairs being performed in private practice. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation is the most common treatment modality (81%), with most surgeons using 2 to 3 sites for exposure, reduction, and fixation with titanium miniplates (70%). Thirty-five percent of surgeons perform routine orbital floor exploration. Forty-three percent quoted training and 32% reported accuracy of repair as the primary reason for choosing ORIF. CONCLUSIONS:: This is the largest reported survey on the repair of zygoma fractures. The response rate suggests dominance of OMFS in zygoma fracture care, an area pioneered by PS. Evolution of technique is also evident by predominance of ORIF with emphasis of multiple points of exposure, reduction, and fixation with rigid hardware.

AB - INTRODUCTION:: Repair of zygomatic fractures can be classified into the early closed reduction or the more recent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) methods. Surgical training and literature advocate ORIF, but the actual frequency of the different techniques in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in the management of zygomatic fractures among US surgeons and elucidate their influences. METHODS:: A 10-question survey was developed and distributed to over 16,000 practicing US facial trauma surgeons, including plastic surgeons (PS), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT). The survey queried training background, zygoma fracture treatment preferences, and rationale. Responses were tabulated and both univariate and bivariate statistical analyses completed. RESULTS:: One thousand six hundred eleven (10%) total responses were received. Zygomatic fractures are treated most commonly by OMFS (61%), then PS (20%) and ENT (19%), with 71% of repairs being performed in private practice. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation is the most common treatment modality (81%), with most surgeons using 2 to 3 sites for exposure, reduction, and fixation with titanium miniplates (70%). Thirty-five percent of surgeons perform routine orbital floor exploration. Forty-three percent quoted training and 32% reported accuracy of repair as the primary reason for choosing ORIF. CONCLUSIONS:: This is the largest reported survey on the repair of zygoma fractures. The response rate suggests dominance of OMFS in zygoma fracture care, an area pioneered by PS. Evolution of technique is also evident by predominance of ORIF with emphasis of multiple points of exposure, reduction, and fixation with rigid hardware.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978699043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978699043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002880

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002880

M3 - Article

C2 - 27428911

AN - SCOPUS:84978699043

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

ER -