Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients

Sandra K. Hanneman, Gary M. Gusick, Shannan K. Hamlin, Sheryln J. Wachtel, Stanley G. Cron, Deborah Jones, Sandra A. Oldham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation. Methods: Randomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manualturn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes. Results: Of 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75%) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67% overall), change in PPC score (ß = 0.15, manual turn and ß = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time. Conclusions: The incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-32
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Critical Care
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Lung
Intensive Care Units
Critical Care
Artificial Respiration
Incidence
Tertiary Care Centers
Sample Size
Linear Models
Length of Stay
Thorax
Randomized Controlled Trials
Safety
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Cite this

Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients. / Hanneman, Sandra K.; Gusick, Gary M.; Hamlin, Shannan K.; Wachtel, Sheryln J.; Cron, Stanley G.; Jones, Deborah; Oldham, Sandra A.

In: American Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 24-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hanneman, Sandra K. ; Gusick, Gary M. ; Hamlin, Shannan K. ; Wachtel, Sheryln J. ; Cron, Stanley G. ; Jones, Deborah ; Oldham, Sandra A. / Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients. In: American Journal of Critical Care. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 24-32.
@article{9c6e540fa5d64439a7c46a34d370fc6b,
title = "Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients",
abstract = "Purpose: To estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation. Methods: Randomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manualturn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes. Results: Of 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75{\%}) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67{\%} overall), change in PPC score ({\ss} = 0.15, manual turn and {\ss} = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time. Conclusions: The incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.",
author = "Hanneman, {Sandra K.} and Gusick, {Gary M.} and Hamlin, {Shannan K.} and Wachtel, {Sheryln J.} and Cron, {Stanley G.} and Deborah Jones and Oldham, {Sandra A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4037/ajcc2015171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "24--32",
journal = "American Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "1062-3264",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients

AU - Hanneman, Sandra K.

AU - Gusick, Gary M.

AU - Hamlin, Shannan K.

AU - Wachtel, Sheryln J.

AU - Cron, Stanley G.

AU - Jones, Deborah

AU - Oldham, Sandra A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation. Methods: Randomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manualturn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes. Results: Of 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75%) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67% overall), change in PPC score (ß = 0.15, manual turn and ß = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time. Conclusions: The incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.

AB - Purpose: To estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation. Methods: Randomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manualturn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes. Results: Of 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75%) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67% overall), change in PPC score (ß = 0.15, manual turn and ß = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time. Conclusions: The incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964308506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964308506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4037/ajcc2015171

DO - 10.4037/ajcc2015171

M3 - Article

C2 - 25554551

AN - SCOPUS:84964308506

VL - 24

SP - 24

EP - 32

JO - American Journal of Critical Care

JF - American Journal of Critical Care

SN - 1062-3264

IS - 1

ER -