Mass and functional capacity of regenerating muscle is enhanced by myoblast transfer

Maria E. Arcila, Bill Ameredes, John F. DeRosimo, Charles H. Washabaugh, Jiwei Yang, Peter C. Johnson, Marcia Ontell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Morphology and functional capacity of homotopically transplanted extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) of adult SCID mice that received 1 x 106 myoblasts [stably transfected to express nuclear localizing β- galactosidase under the control of the myosin light-chain 3F promoter/enhancer] 2 days posttransplantation were evaluated 9 weeks after transplantation, to determine whether the injection of exogenous myoblasts had an effect on muscle regeneration. Regenerated muscles that received exogenous myoblasts were compared to similarly transplanted muscles that received (a) no further treatment, or (b) sham injection of the vehicle (without myoblasts) and to unoperated EDL. Nine weeks after myoblast transfer, myofibers containing donor-derived nuclei could be identified after staining with X-gal solution. Judging from its size and poor functional performance compared to muscles subjected to transplantation only, sham injection provided a secondary trauma to the regenerating muscle from which it failed to fully recover. In comparison to the sham-injected muscle, the myoblast-injected muscles weighed 61% more and had 50% more myofibers and 82% more cross-sectional area occupied by myofibers at the muscles' widest girths. Their absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were threefold and twofold greater, respectively, and their specific twitch and tetanic tensions were 71% and 50% greater, respectively, than those of sham-injected muscles. In many parameters, the regenerating muscle subjected to myoblast transfer equaled or exceeded those of muscles that were transplanted only (received only one trauma). Absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were 73% and 65% greater, respectively, and specific twitch tensions of the muscles receiving myoblasts were 50% greater than forces generated by muscles subjected to whole-muscle transplantation only.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-198
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neurobiology
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myoblasts
Muscles
Transplantation
Injections
Galactosidases
Muscle Tonus
Myosin Light Chains
SCID Mice

Keywords

  • Contractile properties
  • Morphology
  • Muscle regeneration
  • Muscle transplantation
  • Myoblast transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Mass and functional capacity of regenerating muscle is enhanced by myoblast transfer. / Arcila, Maria E.; Ameredes, Bill; DeRosimo, John F.; Washabaugh, Charles H.; Yang, Jiwei; Johnson, Peter C.; Ontell, Marcia.

In: Journal of Neurobiology, Vol. 33, No. 2, 08.1997, p. 185-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arcila, Maria E. ; Ameredes, Bill ; DeRosimo, John F. ; Washabaugh, Charles H. ; Yang, Jiwei ; Johnson, Peter C. ; Ontell, Marcia. / Mass and functional capacity of regenerating muscle is enhanced by myoblast transfer. In: Journal of Neurobiology. 1997 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 185-198.
@article{7ba47517772c4b10a83ff7a05445de42,
title = "Mass and functional capacity of regenerating muscle is enhanced by myoblast transfer",
abstract = "Morphology and functional capacity of homotopically transplanted extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) of adult SCID mice that received 1 x 106 myoblasts [stably transfected to express nuclear localizing β- galactosidase under the control of the myosin light-chain 3F promoter/enhancer] 2 days posttransplantation were evaluated 9 weeks after transplantation, to determine whether the injection of exogenous myoblasts had an effect on muscle regeneration. Regenerated muscles that received exogenous myoblasts were compared to similarly transplanted muscles that received (a) no further treatment, or (b) sham injection of the vehicle (without myoblasts) and to unoperated EDL. Nine weeks after myoblast transfer, myofibers containing donor-derived nuclei could be identified after staining with X-gal solution. Judging from its size and poor functional performance compared to muscles subjected to transplantation only, sham injection provided a secondary trauma to the regenerating muscle from which it failed to fully recover. In comparison to the sham-injected muscle, the myoblast-injected muscles weighed 61{\%} more and had 50{\%} more myofibers and 82{\%} more cross-sectional area occupied by myofibers at the muscles' widest girths. Their absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were threefold and twofold greater, respectively, and their specific twitch and tetanic tensions were 71{\%} and 50{\%} greater, respectively, than those of sham-injected muscles. In many parameters, the regenerating muscle subjected to myoblast transfer equaled or exceeded those of muscles that were transplanted only (received only one trauma). Absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were 73{\%} and 65{\%} greater, respectively, and specific twitch tensions of the muscles receiving myoblasts were 50{\%} greater than forces generated by muscles subjected to whole-muscle transplantation only.",
keywords = "Contractile properties, Morphology, Muscle regeneration, Muscle transplantation, Myoblast transfer",
author = "Arcila, {Maria E.} and Bill Ameredes and DeRosimo, {John F.} and Washabaugh, {Charles H.} and Jiwei Yang and Johnson, {Peter C.} and Marcia Ontell",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199708)33:2<185::AID-NEU7>3.0.CO;2-Z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "185--198",
journal = "Developmental Neurobiology",
issn = "1932-8451",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mass and functional capacity of regenerating muscle is enhanced by myoblast transfer

AU - Arcila, Maria E.

AU - Ameredes, Bill

AU - DeRosimo, John F.

AU - Washabaugh, Charles H.

AU - Yang, Jiwei

AU - Johnson, Peter C.

AU - Ontell, Marcia

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - Morphology and functional capacity of homotopically transplanted extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) of adult SCID mice that received 1 x 106 myoblasts [stably transfected to express nuclear localizing β- galactosidase under the control of the myosin light-chain 3F promoter/enhancer] 2 days posttransplantation were evaluated 9 weeks after transplantation, to determine whether the injection of exogenous myoblasts had an effect on muscle regeneration. Regenerated muscles that received exogenous myoblasts were compared to similarly transplanted muscles that received (a) no further treatment, or (b) sham injection of the vehicle (without myoblasts) and to unoperated EDL. Nine weeks after myoblast transfer, myofibers containing donor-derived nuclei could be identified after staining with X-gal solution. Judging from its size and poor functional performance compared to muscles subjected to transplantation only, sham injection provided a secondary trauma to the regenerating muscle from which it failed to fully recover. In comparison to the sham-injected muscle, the myoblast-injected muscles weighed 61% more and had 50% more myofibers and 82% more cross-sectional area occupied by myofibers at the muscles' widest girths. Their absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were threefold and twofold greater, respectively, and their specific twitch and tetanic tensions were 71% and 50% greater, respectively, than those of sham-injected muscles. In many parameters, the regenerating muscle subjected to myoblast transfer equaled or exceeded those of muscles that were transplanted only (received only one trauma). Absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were 73% and 65% greater, respectively, and specific twitch tensions of the muscles receiving myoblasts were 50% greater than forces generated by muscles subjected to whole-muscle transplantation only.

AB - Morphology and functional capacity of homotopically transplanted extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) of adult SCID mice that received 1 x 106 myoblasts [stably transfected to express nuclear localizing β- galactosidase under the control of the myosin light-chain 3F promoter/enhancer] 2 days posttransplantation were evaluated 9 weeks after transplantation, to determine whether the injection of exogenous myoblasts had an effect on muscle regeneration. Regenerated muscles that received exogenous myoblasts were compared to similarly transplanted muscles that received (a) no further treatment, or (b) sham injection of the vehicle (without myoblasts) and to unoperated EDL. Nine weeks after myoblast transfer, myofibers containing donor-derived nuclei could be identified after staining with X-gal solution. Judging from its size and poor functional performance compared to muscles subjected to transplantation only, sham injection provided a secondary trauma to the regenerating muscle from which it failed to fully recover. In comparison to the sham-injected muscle, the myoblast-injected muscles weighed 61% more and had 50% more myofibers and 82% more cross-sectional area occupied by myofibers at the muscles' widest girths. Their absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were threefold and twofold greater, respectively, and their specific twitch and tetanic tensions were 71% and 50% greater, respectively, than those of sham-injected muscles. In many parameters, the regenerating muscle subjected to myoblast transfer equaled or exceeded those of muscles that were transplanted only (received only one trauma). Absolute twitch and tetanic tensions were 73% and 65% greater, respectively, and specific twitch tensions of the muscles receiving myoblasts were 50% greater than forces generated by muscles subjected to whole-muscle transplantation only.

KW - Contractile properties

KW - Morphology

KW - Muscle regeneration

KW - Muscle transplantation

KW - Myoblast transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030848896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030848896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199708)33:2<185::AID-NEU7>3.0.CO;2-Z

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199708)33:2<185::AID-NEU7>3.0.CO;2-Z

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 185

EP - 198

JO - Developmental Neurobiology

JF - Developmental Neurobiology

SN - 1932-8451

IS - 2

ER -