Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities

Kenneth Ottenbacher, Michael E. Msall, Nancy Lyon, Linda C. Duffy, Carl V. Granger, Susan Braun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM(TM)), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r = 0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r = 0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-194
Number of pages9
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Disabled Children
Psychological Adaptation
Social Class
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Equipment and Supplies
Developmental Disabilities
Motor Skills
Self Care
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Msall, Michael E.; Lyon, Nancy; Duffy, Linda C.; Granger, Carl V.; Braun, Susan.

In: Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1999, p. 186-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Msall, Michael E. ; Lyon, Nancy ; Duffy, Linda C. ; Granger, Carl V. ; Braun, Susan. / Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities. In: Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1999 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 186-194.
@article{7ed15575bfe24049ba9255f5535678a0,
title = "Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities",
abstract = "This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM(TM)), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r = 0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r = 0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and Msall, {Michael E.} and Nancy Lyon and Duffy, {Linda C.} and Granger, {Carl V.} and Susan Braun",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1017/S0012162299000377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "186--194",
journal = "Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology",
issn = "0012-1622",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Msall, Michael E.

AU - Lyon, Nancy

AU - Duffy, Linda C.

AU - Granger, Carl V.

AU - Braun, Susan

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM(TM)), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r = 0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r = 0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.

AB - This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM(TM)), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r = 0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r = 0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033034411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033034411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0012162299000377

DO - 10.1017/S0012162299000377

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 186

EP - 194

JO - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

JF - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

SN - 0012-1622

IS - 3

ER -