Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States

William Winslade, E. H. Liston, J. W. Ross, K. D. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The standards for ECT recommended by an APA task force report and those embodied in federal court orders and state statutes and regulations are compared. The authors conclude that there is serious boundary and role confusion owing to progressive intrusion of state authority into areas traditionally held to lie in the domain of medical judgment and clinical care. In spite of comprehensive safeguards promulgated by the psychiatric community, overregulation by legislatures and courts is commonplace, interposing law between physicians and patients and resulting in delays or denials of service while failing to resolve critical legal issues involving competence and consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1349-1355
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume141
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Confusion
Advisory Committees
Mental Competency
Psychiatry
Physicians
Denial (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Winslade, W., Liston, E. H., Ross, J. W., & Weber, K. D. (1984). Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141(11), 1349-1355.

Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States. / Winslade, William; Liston, E. H.; Ross, J. W.; Weber, K. D.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 141, No. 11, 1984, p. 1349-1355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winslade, W, Liston, EH, Ross, JW & Weber, KD 1984, 'Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 1349-1355.
Winslade, William ; Liston, E. H. ; Ross, J. W. ; Weber, K. D. / Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1984 ; Vol. 141, No. 11. pp. 1349-1355.
@article{fe6e3816427e41bab276b939171c5ccc,
title = "Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States",
abstract = "The standards for ECT recommended by an APA task force report and those embodied in federal court orders and state statutes and regulations are compared. The authors conclude that there is serious boundary and role confusion owing to progressive intrusion of state authority into areas traditionally held to lie in the domain of medical judgment and clinical care. In spite of comprehensive safeguards promulgated by the psychiatric community, overregulation by legislatures and courts is commonplace, interposing law between physicians and patients and resulting in delays or denials of service while failing to resolve critical legal issues involving competence and consent.",
author = "William Winslade and Liston, {E. H.} and Ross, {J. W.} and Weber, {K. D.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "1349--1355",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical, judicial, and statutory regulation of ECT in the United States

AU - Winslade, William

AU - Liston, E. H.

AU - Ross, J. W.

AU - Weber, K. D.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The standards for ECT recommended by an APA task force report and those embodied in federal court orders and state statutes and regulations are compared. The authors conclude that there is serious boundary and role confusion owing to progressive intrusion of state authority into areas traditionally held to lie in the domain of medical judgment and clinical care. In spite of comprehensive safeguards promulgated by the psychiatric community, overregulation by legislatures and courts is commonplace, interposing law between physicians and patients and resulting in delays or denials of service while failing to resolve critical legal issues involving competence and consent.

AB - The standards for ECT recommended by an APA task force report and those embodied in federal court orders and state statutes and regulations are compared. The authors conclude that there is serious boundary and role confusion owing to progressive intrusion of state authority into areas traditionally held to lie in the domain of medical judgment and clinical care. In spite of comprehensive safeguards promulgated by the psychiatric community, overregulation by legislatures and courts is commonplace, interposing law between physicians and patients and resulting in delays or denials of service while failing to resolve critical legal issues involving competence and consent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021189809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021189809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6496778

AN - SCOPUS:0021189809

VL - 141

SP - 1349

EP - 1355

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 11

ER -