Medical student academic misconduct: Implications of recent case law and possible institutional responses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent case law has protected medical students found guilty of academic misconduct from severe sanctions by emphasizing due process and contractual rights. In light of this development, proactive approaches should be considered by medical schools. Faculty or administrators who have legal backgrounds are more likely to avoid breach of contract and violation of due process and should be appointed as hearing officers in cases of alleged academic misconduct. Finally, determination of a student's mental state (as defined in the MPC) by the hearing officer is a fair and rational method of determining what sanctions should be placed on medical students found to have cheated or plagiarized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)887-889
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume68
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Civil Rights
case law
Medical Students
sanction
Hearing
medical student
Contracts
Administrative Personnel
Medical Schools
Students
school
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Medical student academic misconduct : Implications of recent case law and possible institutional responses. / Wagner, Richard.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, No. 12, 1993, p. 887-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ee06a5a16e34d6bbd71e1cbe0ee4d89,
title = "Medical student academic misconduct: Implications of recent case law and possible institutional responses",
abstract = "Recent case law has protected medical students found guilty of academic misconduct from severe sanctions by emphasizing due process and contractual rights. In light of this development, proactive approaches should be considered by medical schools. Faculty or administrators who have legal backgrounds are more likely to avoid breach of contract and violation of due process and should be appointed as hearing officers in cases of alleged academic misconduct. Finally, determination of a student's mental state (as defined in the MPC) by the hearing officer is a fair and rational method of determining what sanctions should be placed on medical students found to have cheated or plagiarized.",
author = "Richard Wagner",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "887--889",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical student academic misconduct

T2 - Implications of recent case law and possible institutional responses

AU - Wagner, Richard

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Recent case law has protected medical students found guilty of academic misconduct from severe sanctions by emphasizing due process and contractual rights. In light of this development, proactive approaches should be considered by medical schools. Faculty or administrators who have legal backgrounds are more likely to avoid breach of contract and violation of due process and should be appointed as hearing officers in cases of alleged academic misconduct. Finally, determination of a student's mental state (as defined in the MPC) by the hearing officer is a fair and rational method of determining what sanctions should be placed on medical students found to have cheated or plagiarized.

AB - Recent case law has protected medical students found guilty of academic misconduct from severe sanctions by emphasizing due process and contractual rights. In light of this development, proactive approaches should be considered by medical schools. Faculty or administrators who have legal backgrounds are more likely to avoid breach of contract and violation of due process and should be appointed as hearing officers in cases of alleged academic misconduct. Finally, determination of a student's mental state (as defined in the MPC) by the hearing officer is a fair and rational method of determining what sanctions should be placed on medical students found to have cheated or plagiarized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027144108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027144108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8259957

AN - SCOPUS:0027144108

VL - 68

SP - 887

EP - 889

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -