Methodologic challenges of e-health research

J. Michael Bowling, Barbara K. Rimer, Elizabeth J. Lyons, Carol E. Golin, Gilles Frydman, Kurt M. Ribisl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, research-based strategies used in a web-based study to assess the impact of participation in cancer-related mailing lists on cancer survivors and caregivers are highlighted. The paper presents alternative methods of measuring response rates in Internet surveys. Response rate estimation, based on American Association for Public Opinion Research guidelines, ranged between 15% and 24.9% for the study. Several strategies were implemented to increase survey participation and reduce item nonresponse. Few participants opted for a telephone survey as an alternative to a web-administered design (mixed-mode administration). Using time-stamp data to diagnose places in the questionnaire where respondents prematurely exited or broke off survey participation, we were able to decrease premature break offs. A lottery was also implemented to increase response rates. The experience of obtaining institutional review board approval for the lottery is also described. Preliminary data indicate slight increases in response rates subsequent to implementing the lottery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-396
Number of pages7
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Information technology
  • Interactive health communication
  • Internet
  • Listservs
  • Mailing lists
  • Methodology
  • Online communities
  • Patients
  • Survivors
  • e-health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodologic challenges of e-health research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this