TY - JOUR
T1 - Middle meningeal artery as a pathway to innovative treatments
T2 - ARISE III consensus recommendations
AU - Samaniego, Edgar A.
AU - Savastano, Luis
AU - Amans, Matthew Robert
AU - Altschul, David
AU - Bain, Mark
AU - Dabus, Guilherme
AU - Fiorella, David
AU - Grandhi, Ramesh
AU - Inoa-Acosta, Violiza
AU - Kadirvel, Ramanathan
AU - Kellner, Christopher Paul
AU - Morales, Jose
AU - Nogueira, Raul G.
AU - Patel, Akash
AU - Qureshi, Adnan I.
AU - Arthur, Adam S.
AU - Wakhloo, Ajay K.
AU - Kan, Peter
AU - Consortium, ARISE R.I.S.E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background: The middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an endovascular route for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), meningioma, and refractory headaches. The third ARISE roundtable convened experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, industry, and regulatory agencies to develop consensus guidance on current evidence for MMA-based therapies Methods: Over 50 experts participated in a multi-stakeholder discussion. Evidence from randomized and observational studies, early-phase interventional series, and preclinical work was reviewed. Breakout groups focused on four domains: (1) MMA embolization (MMAE) for CSDH, (2) preoperative embolization of meningiomas, (3) MMA-targeted therapies for headache, and (4) transvascular access for endovascular drainage of subdural hematomas. Consensus recommendations were developed by a writing committee Results: Randomized trials support MMAE as an adjunct to surgery or medical management for selected patients with non-acute, symptomatic CSDH to reduce recurrence, progression, and reoperation. Evidence remains insufficient to support MMAE for acute or asymptomatic subdural hematomas. For meningioma, observational data suggest that preoperative embolization in experienced centers can reduce blood loss and operative time and may delay recurrence in large, hypervascular tumors with predominant dural or external carotid supply; primary embolization and intra-arterial oncologic therapies remain investigational. Early series of MMA-directed lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine, status migrainosus, and post-subarachnoid hemorrhage headache show short-term benefit, highlighting the need for controlled trials. Preclinical and first-in-human studies of combined MMAE and transvascular drainage for CSDH demonstrate high technical success, rapid radiographic and clinical improvement, and no early recurrences Conclusion: The MMA represents a vascular pathway for an expanding spectrum of neurointerventional therapies.
AB - Background: The middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an endovascular route for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), meningioma, and refractory headaches. The third ARISE roundtable convened experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, industry, and regulatory agencies to develop consensus guidance on current evidence for MMA-based therapies Methods: Over 50 experts participated in a multi-stakeholder discussion. Evidence from randomized and observational studies, early-phase interventional series, and preclinical work was reviewed. Breakout groups focused on four domains: (1) MMA embolization (MMAE) for CSDH, (2) preoperative embolization of meningiomas, (3) MMA-targeted therapies for headache, and (4) transvascular access for endovascular drainage of subdural hematomas. Consensus recommendations were developed by a writing committee Results: Randomized trials support MMAE as an adjunct to surgery or medical management for selected patients with non-acute, symptomatic CSDH to reduce recurrence, progression, and reoperation. Evidence remains insufficient to support MMAE for acute or asymptomatic subdural hematomas. For meningioma, observational data suggest that preoperative embolization in experienced centers can reduce blood loss and operative time and may delay recurrence in large, hypervascular tumors with predominant dural or external carotid supply; primary embolization and intra-arterial oncologic therapies remain investigational. Early series of MMA-directed lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine, status migrainosus, and post-subarachnoid hemorrhage headache show short-term benefit, highlighting the need for controlled trials. Preclinical and first-in-human studies of combined MMAE and transvascular drainage for CSDH demonstrate high technical success, rapid radiographic and clinical improvement, and no early recurrences Conclusion: The MMA represents a vascular pathway for an expanding spectrum of neurointerventional therapies.
KW - Angiography
KW - Artery
KW - Intervention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038396922
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105038396922#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1136/jnis-2026-025150
DO - 10.1136/jnis-2026-025150
M3 - Review article
C2 - 42097871
AN - SCOPUS:105038396922
SN - 1759-8478
JO - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
JF - Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ER -