Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making

Amy L. McGuire, Laurence B. McCullough, Susan Weller, Simon N. Whitney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Physicians are encouraged to actively involve patients in clinical decision-making, but this expectation has not been adequately examined from the physicians' perspective. Our objective was to identify and characterize physicians' attitudes toward patient participation in decision-making and to gain insight into how they consequently think about and structure the decision-making process. Design: This was a qualitative cross-sectional study of physicians' reported attitudes and practices. Setting: The study took place in private practice and academic physicians' practices. Participants: A total of 53 academic and private practice physicians from primary care and surgical specialties, ranging from first year residents to recently retired, participated in the study. Measurements: We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured individual interviews. Results: The physicians in this study expressed consistently positive attitudes toward patient participation in medical decision-making. They identified patient autonomy as an essential justification for patient participation but often went beyond an autonomy-based rationale. Several were motivated by the fundamental principle of beneficence as well as their own self-interest in avoiding legal liability. Many physicians saw their role as an expert who educates the patient but retains control over the decision-making process; others took a more collaborative approach, encouraging patients to assume decisional priority. The decision-making process often was modified by patient, physician, and environmental factors. Conclusions: The physicians in this study demonstrated a positive, flexible approach toward including patients in decision-making. A one-dimensional model of shared decision-making based solely on the principle of autonomy fails to account for variability in how physicians allocate decisional priority and is therefore ethically inadequate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)466-470
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Care
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
physician
Physicians
decision making
participation
Decision Making
decision-making process
Private Practice
autonomy
Clinical Decision-Making
Surgical Specialties
Beneficence
Legal Liability
Primary Care Physicians
cross-sectional study
liability
environmental factors
Cross-Sectional Studies
Interviews

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Ethics
  • Informed consent
  • Medical
  • Models
  • Patient participation
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Qualitative research
  • Theoretical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. / McGuire, Amy L.; McCullough, Laurence B.; Weller, Susan; Whitney, Simon N.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 43, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 466-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGuire, Amy L. ; McCullough, Laurence B. ; Weller, Susan ; Whitney, Simon N. / Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. In: Medical Care. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 5. pp. 466-470.
@article{6d32c1cdff9245cdbf6d850dec605df8,
title = "Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making",
abstract = "Objective: Physicians are encouraged to actively involve patients in clinical decision-making, but this expectation has not been adequately examined from the physicians' perspective. Our objective was to identify and characterize physicians' attitudes toward patient participation in decision-making and to gain insight into how they consequently think about and structure the decision-making process. Design: This was a qualitative cross-sectional study of physicians' reported attitudes and practices. Setting: The study took place in private practice and academic physicians' practices. Participants: A total of 53 academic and private practice physicians from primary care and surgical specialties, ranging from first year residents to recently retired, participated in the study. Measurements: We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured individual interviews. Results: The physicians in this study expressed consistently positive attitudes toward patient participation in medical decision-making. They identified patient autonomy as an essential justification for patient participation but often went beyond an autonomy-based rationale. Several were motivated by the fundamental principle of beneficence as well as their own self-interest in avoiding legal liability. Many physicians saw their role as an expert who educates the patient but retains control over the decision-making process; others took a more collaborative approach, encouraging patients to assume decisional priority. The decision-making process often was modified by patient, physician, and environmental factors. Conclusions: The physicians in this study demonstrated a positive, flexible approach toward including patients in decision-making. A one-dimensional model of shared decision-making based solely on the principle of autonomy fails to account for variability in how physicians allocate decisional priority and is therefore ethically inadequate.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Ethics, Informed consent, Medical, Models, Patient participation, Physician-patient relations, Qualitative research, Theoretical",
author = "McGuire, {Amy L.} and McCullough, {Laurence B.} and Susan Weller and Whitney, {Simon N.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlr.0000160415.08497.11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "466--470",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making

AU - McGuire, Amy L.

AU - McCullough, Laurence B.

AU - Weller, Susan

AU - Whitney, Simon N.

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Objective: Physicians are encouraged to actively involve patients in clinical decision-making, but this expectation has not been adequately examined from the physicians' perspective. Our objective was to identify and characterize physicians' attitudes toward patient participation in decision-making and to gain insight into how they consequently think about and structure the decision-making process. Design: This was a qualitative cross-sectional study of physicians' reported attitudes and practices. Setting: The study took place in private practice and academic physicians' practices. Participants: A total of 53 academic and private practice physicians from primary care and surgical specialties, ranging from first year residents to recently retired, participated in the study. Measurements: We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured individual interviews. Results: The physicians in this study expressed consistently positive attitudes toward patient participation in medical decision-making. They identified patient autonomy as an essential justification for patient participation but often went beyond an autonomy-based rationale. Several were motivated by the fundamental principle of beneficence as well as their own self-interest in avoiding legal liability. Many physicians saw their role as an expert who educates the patient but retains control over the decision-making process; others took a more collaborative approach, encouraging patients to assume decisional priority. The decision-making process often was modified by patient, physician, and environmental factors. Conclusions: The physicians in this study demonstrated a positive, flexible approach toward including patients in decision-making. A one-dimensional model of shared decision-making based solely on the principle of autonomy fails to account for variability in how physicians allocate decisional priority and is therefore ethically inadequate.

AB - Objective: Physicians are encouraged to actively involve patients in clinical decision-making, but this expectation has not been adequately examined from the physicians' perspective. Our objective was to identify and characterize physicians' attitudes toward patient participation in decision-making and to gain insight into how they consequently think about and structure the decision-making process. Design: This was a qualitative cross-sectional study of physicians' reported attitudes and practices. Setting: The study took place in private practice and academic physicians' practices. Participants: A total of 53 academic and private practice physicians from primary care and surgical specialties, ranging from first year residents to recently retired, participated in the study. Measurements: We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured individual interviews. Results: The physicians in this study expressed consistently positive attitudes toward patient participation in medical decision-making. They identified patient autonomy as an essential justification for patient participation but often went beyond an autonomy-based rationale. Several were motivated by the fundamental principle of beneficence as well as their own self-interest in avoiding legal liability. Many physicians saw their role as an expert who educates the patient but retains control over the decision-making process; others took a more collaborative approach, encouraging patients to assume decisional priority. The decision-making process often was modified by patient, physician, and environmental factors. Conclusions: The physicians in this study demonstrated a positive, flexible approach toward including patients in decision-making. A one-dimensional model of shared decision-making based solely on the principle of autonomy fails to account for variability in how physicians allocate decisional priority and is therefore ethically inadequate.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Medical

KW - Models

KW - Patient participation

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Theoretical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844441399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844441399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160415.08497.11

DO - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160415.08497.11

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 466

EP - 470

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 5

ER -