Modulation of allosteric behavior through adjustment of the differential stability of the two interacting domains in E. coli cAMP receptor protein

Jianquan Li, James Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The communication mechanism(s) responsible for the allosteric behavior of E.coli cAMP binding receptor protein, CRP, is still a subject of intense investigation. As a tool to explore the communication mechanism, the mutations at various positions in the cAMP-binding (K52N, D53H, S62F and T127L) or the DNA- binding (H159L) domain or both (K52N/H159L) were generated. The sites and specific nature of side chain substitutions were defined by earlier genetic studies, the results of which show that these mutants have a similar phenotype i.e. they are activated without exogenous cAMP. Presently, no significant changes in the structures of WT and mutant CRPs have been observed. Hence, the pressing issue is to identify a physical parameter that reflects the effects of mutations. In this study, the stability of these various CRP species in the presence of GuHCl was monitored by three spectroscopic techniques, namely, CD, tryptophan fluorescence and FT-IR which could provide data on the stability of α-helices and β-strands separately. Results of this study led to the following conclusions: 1. The α-helices can be grouped into two families with different stabilities. Mutations exert a differential effect on the stability of helices as demonstrated by a biphasic unfolding curve for the helices. 2. Regardless of the locations of mutations, the effects can be communicated to the other domain resulting in a perturbation of the stability of both domains, although the effects are more significantly expressed in the stability of the helices. 3. Although in an earlier study [Gekko, et al. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 3844] we showed that cooperativity of cAMP binding is generally correlated to the global dynamics of the protein and DNA binding affinity, in this study we found that generally there is no clear correlation between functional energetics and stability of secondary structures. Thus, results of this study imply that modulation of allostery in CRP is entropic in nature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-216
Number of pages7
JournalBiophysical Chemistry
Volume159
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Modulation
Mutation
DNA-Binding Proteins
Tryptophan
Biochemistry
Carrier Proteins
Fluorescence
Phenotype
Communication
E coli crp protein
DNA
Escherichia coli
Substitution reactions
Proteins

Keywords

  • Allostery
  • cAMP receptor protein
  • FT-IR
  • Protein stability and dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Modulation of allosteric behavior through adjustment of the differential stability of the two interacting domains in E. coli cAMP receptor protein. / Li, Jianquan; Lee, James.

In: Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 159, No. 1, 11.2011, p. 210-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd720098f9d44dc2a3eb355fc39e0141,
title = "Modulation of allosteric behavior through adjustment of the differential stability of the two interacting domains in E. coli cAMP receptor protein",
abstract = "The communication mechanism(s) responsible for the allosteric behavior of E.coli cAMP binding receptor protein, CRP, is still a subject of intense investigation. As a tool to explore the communication mechanism, the mutations at various positions in the cAMP-binding (K52N, D53H, S62F and T127L) or the DNA- binding (H159L) domain or both (K52N/H159L) were generated. The sites and specific nature of side chain substitutions were defined by earlier genetic studies, the results of which show that these mutants have a similar phenotype i.e. they are activated without exogenous cAMP. Presently, no significant changes in the structures of WT and mutant CRPs have been observed. Hence, the pressing issue is to identify a physical parameter that reflects the effects of mutations. In this study, the stability of these various CRP species in the presence of GuHCl was monitored by three spectroscopic techniques, namely, CD, tryptophan fluorescence and FT-IR which could provide data on the stability of α-helices and β-strands separately. Results of this study led to the following conclusions: 1. The α-helices can be grouped into two families with different stabilities. Mutations exert a differential effect on the stability of helices as demonstrated by a biphasic unfolding curve for the helices. 2. Regardless of the locations of mutations, the effects can be communicated to the other domain resulting in a perturbation of the stability of both domains, although the effects are more significantly expressed in the stability of the helices. 3. Although in an earlier study [Gekko, et al. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 3844] we showed that cooperativity of cAMP binding is generally correlated to the global dynamics of the protein and DNA binding affinity, in this study we found that generally there is no clear correlation between functional energetics and stability of secondary structures. Thus, results of this study imply that modulation of allostery in CRP is entropic in nature.",
keywords = "Allostery, cAMP receptor protein, FT-IR, Protein stability and dynamics",
author = "Jianquan Li and James Lee",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpc.2011.06.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "210--216",
journal = "Biophysical Chemistry",
issn = "0301-4622",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modulation of allosteric behavior through adjustment of the differential stability of the two interacting domains in E. coli cAMP receptor protein

AU - Li, Jianquan

AU - Lee, James

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - The communication mechanism(s) responsible for the allosteric behavior of E.coli cAMP binding receptor protein, CRP, is still a subject of intense investigation. As a tool to explore the communication mechanism, the mutations at various positions in the cAMP-binding (K52N, D53H, S62F and T127L) or the DNA- binding (H159L) domain or both (K52N/H159L) were generated. The sites and specific nature of side chain substitutions were defined by earlier genetic studies, the results of which show that these mutants have a similar phenotype i.e. they are activated without exogenous cAMP. Presently, no significant changes in the structures of WT and mutant CRPs have been observed. Hence, the pressing issue is to identify a physical parameter that reflects the effects of mutations. In this study, the stability of these various CRP species in the presence of GuHCl was monitored by three spectroscopic techniques, namely, CD, tryptophan fluorescence and FT-IR which could provide data on the stability of α-helices and β-strands separately. Results of this study led to the following conclusions: 1. The α-helices can be grouped into two families with different stabilities. Mutations exert a differential effect on the stability of helices as demonstrated by a biphasic unfolding curve for the helices. 2. Regardless of the locations of mutations, the effects can be communicated to the other domain resulting in a perturbation of the stability of both domains, although the effects are more significantly expressed in the stability of the helices. 3. Although in an earlier study [Gekko, et al. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 3844] we showed that cooperativity of cAMP binding is generally correlated to the global dynamics of the protein and DNA binding affinity, in this study we found that generally there is no clear correlation between functional energetics and stability of secondary structures. Thus, results of this study imply that modulation of allostery in CRP is entropic in nature.

AB - The communication mechanism(s) responsible for the allosteric behavior of E.coli cAMP binding receptor protein, CRP, is still a subject of intense investigation. As a tool to explore the communication mechanism, the mutations at various positions in the cAMP-binding (K52N, D53H, S62F and T127L) or the DNA- binding (H159L) domain or both (K52N/H159L) were generated. The sites and specific nature of side chain substitutions were defined by earlier genetic studies, the results of which show that these mutants have a similar phenotype i.e. they are activated without exogenous cAMP. Presently, no significant changes in the structures of WT and mutant CRPs have been observed. Hence, the pressing issue is to identify a physical parameter that reflects the effects of mutations. In this study, the stability of these various CRP species in the presence of GuHCl was monitored by three spectroscopic techniques, namely, CD, tryptophan fluorescence and FT-IR which could provide data on the stability of α-helices and β-strands separately. Results of this study led to the following conclusions: 1. The α-helices can be grouped into two families with different stabilities. Mutations exert a differential effect on the stability of helices as demonstrated by a biphasic unfolding curve for the helices. 2. Regardless of the locations of mutations, the effects can be communicated to the other domain resulting in a perturbation of the stability of both domains, although the effects are more significantly expressed in the stability of the helices. 3. Although in an earlier study [Gekko, et al. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 3844] we showed that cooperativity of cAMP binding is generally correlated to the global dynamics of the protein and DNA binding affinity, in this study we found that generally there is no clear correlation between functional energetics and stability of secondary structures. Thus, results of this study imply that modulation of allostery in CRP is entropic in nature.

KW - Allostery

KW - cAMP receptor protein

KW - FT-IR

KW - Protein stability and dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052316054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052316054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.06.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 21782316

AN - SCOPUS:80052316054

VL - 159

SP - 210

EP - 216

JO - Biophysical Chemistry

JF - Biophysical Chemistry

SN - 0301-4622

IS - 1

ER -