Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length

John Owen, Gary Hankins, Jay D. Iams, Vincenzo Berghella, Jeanne S. Sheffield, Annette Perez-Delboy, Robert S. Egerman, Deborah A. Wing, Mark Tomlinson, Richard Silver, Susan M. Ramin, Edwin R. Guzman, Michael Gordon, Helen Y. How, Eric J. Knudtson, Jeff M. Szychowski, Suzanne Cliver, John C. Hauth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

421 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess cerclage to prevent recurrent preterm birth in women with short cervix. Study Design: Women with prior spontaneous preterm birth less than 34 weeks were screened for short cervix and randomly assigned to cerclage if cervical length was less than 25 mm. Results: Of 1014 women screened, 302 were randomized; 42% of women not assigned and 32% of those assigned to cerclage delivered less than 35 weeks (P = .09). In planned analyses, birth less than 24 weeks (P = .03) and perinatal mortality (P = .046) were less frequent in the cerclage group. There was a significant interaction between cervical length and cerclage. Birth less than 35 weeks (P = .006) was reduced in the less than 15 mm stratum with a null effect in the 15-24 mm stratum. Conclusion: In women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth less than 34 weeks and cervical length less than 25 mm, cerclage reduced previable birth and perinatal mortality but did not prevent birth less than 35 weeks, unless cervical length was less than 15 mm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375.e1-375.e8
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume201
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Keywords

  • cerclage
  • cervical length
  • prior preterm birth
  • vaginal sonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this