Nebulized Epinephrine Limits Pulmonary Vascular Hyperpermeability to Water and Protein in Ovine with Burn and Smoke Inhalation Injury

Ernesto Lopez, Osamu Fujiwara, Francisco Lima-Lopez, Oscar E. Suman, Ronald P. Mlcak, Hal Hawkins, Robert Cox, David Herndon, Donald S. Prough, Perenlei Enkhbaatar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations


Objectives: To test the hypothesis that nebulized epinephrine ameliorates pulmonary dysfunction by dual action-bronchodilation (β2-adrenergic receptor agonism) and attenuation of airway hyperemia (1-adrenergic receptor agonism) with minimal systemic effects. Design: Randomized, controlled, prospective, and large animal translational studies. Setting: University large animal ICU. Subjects: Twelve chronically instrumented sheep. Interventions: The animals were exposed to 40% total body surface area third degree skin flame burn and 48 breaths of cooled cotton smoke inhalation under deep anesthesia and analgesia. The animals were then placed on a mechanical ventilator, fluid resuscitated, and monitored for 48 hours in a conscious state. After the injury, sheep were randomized into two groups: 1) epinephrine, nebulized with 4 mg of epinephrine every 4 hours starting 1 hour post injury, n = 6; or 2) saline, nebulized with saline in the same manner, n = 6. Measurements and Main Results: Treatment with epinephrine had a significant reduction of the pulmonary transvascular fluid flux to water (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.05) when compared with saline treatment from 12 to 48 hours and 36 to 48 hours, respectively. Treatment with epinephrine also reduced the systemic accumulation of body fluids (p < 0.001) with a mean of 1,410 ± 560 mL at 48 hours compared with 3,284 ± 422 mL of the saline group. Hemoglobin levels were comparable between the groups. Changes in respiratory system dynamic compliance, mean airway pressure, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, and oxygenation index were also attenuated with epinephrine treatment. No considerable systemic effects were observed with epinephrine treatment. Conclusions: Nebulized epinephrine should be considered for use in future clinical studies of patients with burns and smoke inhalation injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e89-e96
JournalCritical care medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016


  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Airway hyperemia
  • Burn and smoke inhalation
  • Epinephrine
  • Vascular permeability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Nebulized Epinephrine Limits Pulmonary Vascular Hyperpermeability to Water and Protein in Ovine with Burn and Smoke Inhalation Injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this